Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

PHY Mask Issues Date: Authors: November 2006 November 2006

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "PHY Mask Issues Date: Authors: November 2006 November 2006"— Presentation transcript:

1 PHY Mask Issues Date: 2006-11-03 Authors: November 2006 November 2006
doc.: IEEE /1646r0 November 2006 PHY Mask Issues Date: Authors: Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE Patent Policy and Procedures: The contributor is familiar with the IEEE 802 Patent Policy and Procedures < ieee802.org/guides/bylaws/sb-bylaws.pdf>, including the statement "IEEE standards may include the known use of patent(s), including patent applications, provided the IEEE receives assurance from the patent holder or applicant with respect to patents essential for compliance with both mandatory and optional portions of the standard." Early disclosure to the Working Group of patent information that might be relevant to the standard is essential to reduce the possibility for delays in the development process and increase the likelihood that the draft publication will be approved for publication. Please notify the Chair as early as possible, in written or electronic form, if patented technology (or technology under patent application) might be incorporated into a draft standard being developed within the IEEE Working Group. If you have questions, contact the IEEE Patent Committee Administrator at Hedberg and Petranovich, Conexant Systems, Inc. Jim Petranovich, Conexant Systems, Inc.

2 November 2006 doc.: IEEE /1646r0 November 2006 Abstract The presentation is to motivate discussion regarding resolution of this comments from LB84 (referenced by CID) 1564 Hedberg and Petranovich, Conexant Systems, Inc. Jim Petranovich, Conexant Systems, Inc.

3 November 2006 CID 7164 Comment: “40 MHz Tx mask is too broad to prevent excessive interference with adjacent 40 MHz interferers; -45 dBr floor is difficult to achieve in practice when Tx power is lowered more than 10 dB from maximum allowable; at low Tx powers, -45 dBr is not necessary to avoid interference.” Proposed Change: “Consider narrowing requirement to -28 dBr at 30 MHz offset, -38 dBr at 50 MHz offset, and -45 dBr at 60 MHz offset and above; relax floor requirement to -45 dBr or dBm/MHz, whichever is higher at given Tx power level.” Hedberg and Petranovich, Conexant Systems, Inc.

4 Contents November 2006 Part 1
Limitation of the spectral floors at low Tx output power levels (for both 20 MHz and 40 MHz Tx modes) Part 2 40 MHz Tx mask revision to improve ACI discipline with lower modulation rates Hedberg and Petranovich, Conexant Systems, Inc.

5 November 2006 Part 1 Limitation of the spectral floors at low Tx output power levels (for both 20 MHz and 40 MHz Tx modes) Hedberg and Petranovich, Conexant Systems, Inc.

6 Transmit Spectrum at +18 dBm
November 2006 Transmit Spectrum at +18 dBm View of the Tx mask floor relative to other floors at higher Tx output of +18 dBm Power density per MHz BW spectrum FCC Part 15 limit dBm/MHz Radio Tx noise floor – shown spurious-free Hedberg and Petranovich, Conexant Systems, Inc.

7 Transmit Spectrum at +6 dBm
November 2006 Transmit Spectrum at +6 dBm View of the Tx mask floor relative to other floors at lower Tx output of +6 dBm Radio Tx noise floor reduced 3 dB and well below FCC limits – but does not meet mask FCC Part 15 limit dBm/MHz Radio Tx noise floor – shown spurious-free Hedberg and Petranovich, Conexant Systems, Inc.

8 November 2006 Proposal The relative floor level (-45 dBr) of the .11n draft Tx masks is not a realistic limit with reduced Tx output powers (e.g. +6 dBm or lower) Most external radio power amplifiers have a fixed gain and thus cannot attenuate the transceiver output noise+spurious floor to the levels required by the mask at low Tx power levels In addition, the mask floor levels in this scenario are well below the FCC part 15 limits for spectral emissions in forbidden bands and don’t need to further constrain the radio Tx floor Our proposal is to set the floor limit of Tx output power spectral density to a level corresponding to either -45 dBr from transmitted power in dBm/MHz or dB/MHz, whichever is greater This ensures a floor and spurious level at least 6 dB below the FCC limits for lower Tx powers Radios are still required to meet the FCC Part 15 and other regulatory limits at all power levels Hedberg and Petranovich, Conexant Systems, Inc.

9 Transmit Spectrum at +6 dBm
November 2006 Transmit Spectrum at +6 dBm View of the Tx mask floor relative to other floors at lower Tx output of +6 dBm Radio Tx noise floor is well below FCC limits – but does not meet mask The noise floor meets the new proposed limit shown Mask floor limit capped above at dBm/MHz FCC Part 15 limit dBm/MHz Radio Tx noise floor – shown spurious-free Hedberg and Petranovich, Conexant Systems, Inc.

10 Part 1 - Summary November 2006
Current Tx masks require a floor of -45 dBr relative to Tx power spectral density -- which may vary over a wide range as Tx power is varied We propose placing a minimum cap on the Tx output power spectral density of dBm/MHz – that overrides the mask floor at lower Tx power levels This relieves the radio design of unrealistic output noise and spurious requirements if it transmits at lower output power levels – where the -45 dBr floor would be unnecessarily far below the allowed FCC limit The .11n spec should encourage practical designs that have the flexibility to conserve power with reduced Tx output when link conditions permit Hedberg and Petranovich, Conexant Systems, Inc.

11 November 2006 Part 2 40 MHz Tx mask revision to improve ACI discipline at lower modulation rates Hedberg and Petranovich, Conexant Systems, Inc.

12 .11n Draft 40 MHz and 20 MHz Masks
November 2006 .11n Draft 40 MHz and 20 MHz Masks Current draft proposal 40 MHz Tx mask allows considerably more Tx adjacent channel power leakage than the corresponding 20 MHz Tx mask Hedberg and Petranovich, Conexant Systems, Inc.

13 Example of Mask Limited HT-40 Spectrum
November 2006 Example of Mask Limited HT-40 Spectrum Spectrum can approach mask limits for BPSK and QPSK transmission modes with small PA output backoffs while meeting Tx EVM requirements Leakage into adjacent 56-carrier signal band is 3.5 dB larger than for similar limited 20 MHz transmissions (e.g dB relative to in-band Tx power) 56-L 56-U Hedberg and Petranovich, Conexant Systems, Inc.

14 Mask Limited HT-20 Spectrum
November 2006 Mask Limited HT-20 Spectrum Spectrum can approach mask limits for BPSK and QPSK transmission modes with small PA output backoffs while meeting Tx EVM requirements Example with same PA OBO as HT-40 but with adjacent channel leakage dB Hedberg and Petranovich, Conexant Systems, Inc.

15 Mask Limited Legacy .11a/g Spectrum
November 2006 Mask Limited Legacy .11a/g Spectrum Draft 20MHz HT mask is slightly more restrictive than the legacy .11a/g mask, and tends to enforce a slight increase (e.g. 0.6 dB) in minimum PA OBO for 56-carrier HT signals Maximum adjacent channel leakage for low rate modes is similar for 20M legacy and 20M HT Hedberg and Petranovich, Conexant Systems, Inc.

16 November 2006 Improvement We propose to revise the 40 MHz Tx mask slightly – to make it more consistent with 20 MHz practice in limiting adjacent channel leakage power Current Draft Proposed Rev -20 dBr at 21 MHz No change at 21 MHz -28 dBr at 40 MHz -28 dBr at 30 MHz -38 dBr at 50 MHz (added break-point) -45 dBr at >=60 MHz No change at >=60 MHz The revised Tx mask does not reduce the maximum Tx power available for high-throughput QAM transmissions – which are EVM limited With a given PA characteristic, the maximum amount of Tx power for mask- limited 40 MHz BPSK and QPSK modes is reduced by only a small amount (e.g. 1.2 dB) Hedberg and Petranovich, Conexant Systems, Inc.

17 Proposed Mask Revision
November 2006 Proposed Mask Revision The revision tightens the limit primarily in the adjacent 20 MHz channel segment Hedberg and Petranovich, Conexant Systems, Inc.

18 Comparison with Offset 20M-HT Mask
November 2006 Comparison with Offset 20M-HT Mask 40M and 20M masks now have similar limitations in the adjacent 20 MHz channel segment Hedberg and Petranovich, Conexant Systems, Inc.

19 Example of Mask Limited HT-40 Spectrum
November 2006 Example of Mask Limited HT-40 Spectrum PA output backoff increased by 1.2 dB from previous example with .11n draft mask Leakage into (lower) adjacent channel 56-carrier upper segment reduced by 4.0 dB Leakage into (lower) adjacent channel 56-carrier lower segment reduced by 3.6 dB 56-L 56-U Hedberg and Petranovich, Conexant Systems, Inc.

20 Part 2 - Summary November 2006
Current 40 MHz Tx mask allows about 3 dB more adjacent channel interference due to Tx power leakage than for the 20 MHz HT modes We propose a revision to the 40 MHz mask break-points that puts this maximum interference on par with that allowed in 20 MHz HT and legacy operation With the revised 40 MHz mask, there is no impact to maximum Tx power for 16-QAM and 64-QAM 40 MHz modulations For mask-limited BPSK and QPSK HT-40 transmission modes, the maximum Tx power is reduced slightly by about 1.2 dB or so; but , corresponding ACI leakage into the adjacent 20 MHz channel segments is reduced by at least 3.6 dB for these worst case interferers The revision will enable more balanced protection as 40 MHz .11n modes gain hold in future WLANs Hedberg and Petranovich, Conexant Systems, Inc.

21 References 11/06-0693 PHY Comments from LB84 for TGn
November 2006 doc.: IEEE /1646r0 November 2006 References 11/ PHY Comments from LB84 for TGn 11/ PHY Mask Hedberg and Petranovich, Conexant Systems, Inc. Jim Petranovich, Conexant Systems, Inc.


Download ppt "PHY Mask Issues Date: Authors: November 2006 November 2006"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google