Download presentation

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Published byMacy Elm Modified over 4 years ago

1
CONTROL with LIMITED INFORMATION Daniel Liberzon Coordinated Science Laboratory and Dept. of Electrical & Computer Eng., Univ. of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

2
REASONS for SWITCHING Nature of the control problem Sensor or actuator limitations Large modeling uncertainty Combinations of the above

3
Plant Controller INFORMATION FLOW in CONTROL SYSTEMS

4
Limited communication capacity many control loops share network cable or wireless medium microsystems with many sensors/actuators on one chip Need to minimize information transmission (security) Event-driven actuators Coarse sensing Theoretical interest

5
[ Brockett, Delchamps, Elia, Mitter, Nair, Savkin, Tatikonda, Wong,… ] Deterministic & stochastic models Tools from information theory Mostly for linear plant dynamics BACKGROUND Previous work: Unified framework for quantization time delays disturbances Our goals: Handle nonlinear dynamics

6
Caveat: This doesnt work in general, need robustness from controller OUR APPROACH (Goal: treat nonlinear systems; handle quantization, delays, etc.) Model these effects via deterministic error signals, Design a control law ignoring these errors, Certainty equivalence: apply control, combined with estimation to reduce to zero Technical tools: Input-to-state stability (ISS) Lyapunov functions Small-gain theorems Hybrid systems

7
QUANTIZATION EncoderDecoder QUANTIZER finite subset of is partitioned into quantization regions

8
QUANTIZATION and ISS

9
– assume glob. asymp. stable (GAS) QUANTIZATION and ISS

10
no longer GAS

11
QUANTIZATION and ISS quantization error Assume class

12
Solutions that start in enter and remain there This is input-to-state stability (ISS) w.r.t. measurement errors In time domain: QUANTIZATION and ISS quantization error Assume

13
LINEAR SYSTEMS Quantized control law: 9 feedback gain & Lyapunov function Closed-loop: (automatically ISS w.r.t. )

14
DYNAMIC QUANTIZATION

15
– zooming variable Hybrid quantized control: is discrete state

16
DYNAMIC QUANTIZATION – zooming variable Hybrid quantized control: is discrete state

17
Zoom out to overcome saturation DYNAMIC QUANTIZATION – zooming variable Hybrid quantized control: is discrete state

18
After ultimate bound is achieved, recompute partition for smaller region DYNAMIC QUANTIZATION – zooming variable Hybrid quantized control: is discrete state ISS from to small-gain condition Proof: Can recover global asymptotic stability

19
QUANTIZATION and DELAY Architecture-independent approach Based on the work of Teel Delays possibly large QUANTIZER DELAY

20
QUANTIZATION and DELAY where Can write hence

21
SMALL – GAIN ARGUMENT if then we recover ISS w.r.t. [ Teel 98 ] Small gain: Assuming ISS w.r.t. actuator errors: In time domain:

22
FINAL RESULT Need: small gain true

23
FINAL RESULT Need: small gain true

24
FINAL RESULT solutions starting in enter and remain there Can use zooming to improve convergence Need: small gain true

25
EXTERNAL DISTURBANCES [ Nešić–L ] State quantization and completely unknown disturbance

26
EXTERNAL DISTURBANCES [ Nešić–L ] State quantization and completely unknown disturbance

27
Issue: disturbance forces the state outside quantizer range Must switch repeatedly between zooming-in and zooming-out Result: for linear plant, can achieve ISS w.r.t. disturbance (ISS gains are nonlinear although plant is linear; cf. [ Martins ]) EXTERNAL DISTURBANCES [ Nešić–L ] State quantization and completely unknown disturbance After zoom-in:

28
NETWORKED CONTROL SYSTEMS [ Nešić–L ] NCS: Transmit only some variables according to time scheduling protocol Examples: round-robin, TOD (try-once-discard) QCS: Transmit quantized versions of all variables NQCS: Unified framework combining time scheduling and quantization Basic design/analysis steps: Design controller ignoring network effects Apply small-gain theorem to compute upper bound on maximal allowed transmission interval (MATI) Prove discrete protocol stability via Lyapunov function

29
ACTIVE PROBING for INFORMATION dynamic (changes at sampling times) (time-varying) PLANT QUANTIZER CONTROLLER EncoderDecoder very small

30
NONLINEAR SYSTEMS sampling times Example: Zoom out to get initial bound Between samplings

31
NONLINEAR SYSTEMS is divided by 3 at the sampling time Let Example: Between samplings grows at most by the factor in one period The norm on a suitable compact region (dependent on )

32
Pick small enough s.t. NONLINEAR SYSTEMS (continued) grows at most by the factor in one period is divided by 3 at each sampling time The norm If this is ISS w.r.t. as before, then

33
ROBUSTNESS of the CONTROLLER ISS w.r.t. Same condition as before (restrictive, hard to check) checkable sufficient conditions ([ Hespanha-L-Teel ]) ISS w.r.t. Option 1. Option 2. Look at the evolution of

34
LINEAR SYSTEMS

35
[ Baillieul, Brockett-L, Hespanha, Nair-Evans, Petersen-Savkin,Tatikonda ] Between sampling times, where is Hurwitz 0 divided by 3 at each sampling time grows at most by in one period amount of static info provided by quantizer sampling frequency vs. open-loop instability global quantity:

36
HYBRID SYSTEMS as FEEDBACK CONNECTIONS continuous discrete [ Nešić–L, 05, 06 ] Other decompositions possible Can also have external signals

37
SMALL – GAIN THEOREM Small-gain theorem [ Jiang-Teel-Praly 94 ] gives GAS if: Input-to-state stability (ISS) from to : ISS from to : (small-gain condition)

38
SUFFICIENT CONDITIONS for ISS [ Hespanha-L-Teel 08 ] # of discrete events on is ISS from to if: and ISS from to if ISS-Lyapunov function [ Sontag 89 ] :

39
LYAPUNOV – BASED SMALL – GAIN THEOREM Hybrid system is GAS if: and # of discrete events on is

40
SKETCH of PROOF is nonstrictly decreasing along trajectories Trajectories along which is constant?None! GAS follows by LaSalle principle for hybrid systems [ Lygeros et al. 03, Sanfelice-Goebel-Teel 07 ]

41
quantization error Zoom in: where ISS from to with gain small-gain condition! ISS from to with some linear gain APPLICATION to DYNAMIC QUANTIZATION

42
RESEARCH DIRECTIONS Modeling uncertainty (with L. Vu) Disturbances and coarse quantizers (with Y. Sharon) Avoiding state estimation (with S. LaValle and J. Yu) Quantized output feedback (with H. Shim) Performance-based design (with F. Bullo) Vision-based control (with Y. Ma and Y. Sharon)

Similar presentations

OK

1 Lu LIU and Jie HUANG Department of Mechanics & Automation Engineering The Chinese University of Hong Kong 9 December, 2006 2006 Systems Workshop on Autonomous.

1 Lu LIU and Jie HUANG Department of Mechanics & Automation Engineering The Chinese University of Hong Kong 9 December, 2006 2006 Systems Workshop on Autonomous.

© 2018 SlidePlayer.com Inc.

All rights reserved.

To make this website work, we log user data and share it with processors. To use this website, you must agree to our Privacy Policy, including cookie policy.

Ads by Google

Ppt on turbo generators Ppt on quadrature amplitude modulation Ppt on joints of human body Ppt on non ferrous metals and alloys Ppt on automobile related topics about economics Ppt on combination of resistances in parallel Best ppt on social networking sites Ppt on power line carrier communication system Ppt on therapeutic environment in nursing Download ppt on non conventional energy resources