Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Brian Z Ring, William S Yarnell, Jeffrey W Roberts  Cell 

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Brian Z Ring, William S Yarnell, Jeffrey W Roberts  Cell "— Presentation transcript:

1 Function of E. coli RNA Polymerase σ Factor- σ70 in Promoter-Proximal Pausing 
Brian Z Ring, William S Yarnell, Jeffrey W Roberts  Cell  Volume 86, Issue 3, Pages (August 1996) DOI: /S (00)80121-X

2 Figure 1 DNA Structures of Open and Paused Promoter Complexes of the Phage λ Late Gene Promoter pR′ Melted regions of the open promoter were determined by Kainz and Roberts Matches to consensus of promoter elements in the −35 and −10 regions are shown. This “extended −10” sequence contains the most important bases for promoter function (Kumar et al. 1993); its match to the pause-inducing sequence is also shown. Cell  , DOI: ( /S (00)80121-X)

3 Figure 2 Match of Lambdoid Bacteriophage Late Gene Promoter Pause-Inducing Sequences to Important Elements of the Extended −10 Consensus Pause sites and DNA sequences for λ, 21, and phage 82 were described (Grayhack et al. 1985; Goliger and Roberts 1989; Guo 1990; Guo et al. 1990); the DNA sequence for phage 80 was determined by L. Matthews, D. Kadosh, and J. W. R. (unpublished data), and its features were surmised by analogy with λ. The initiation site is designated by the arrow, and the pause site is underlined. Cell  , DOI: ( /S (00)80121-X)

4 Figure 3 Effect of the Extended −10 Sequence on Pausing at 10 bp Displacement The autoradiogram shows a gel resolution of transcripts of λ+ pR′ DNA, a λ pR′ variant with 10 bp of extraneous DNA introduced just before the site of the first transcribed base (X10#1), and a further variant in which the 10 bp insert DNA is modified to match the extended −10 consensus in the region that induces pausing (X10#1 con). In addition to changes made to match the consensus T-TG-TATAAT, there is a change to pyrimidine at −10 (Kumar et al. 1993) and an irrelevant change at +5. Matches to the extended −10 sequence are shown by bullets. RNAs below the +16/17 pause RNAs are abortive initiation products, which vary in pattern and intensity with different initial transcribed sequences. Cell  , DOI: ( /S (00)80121-X)

5 Figure 6 Effect of Displacing the Pause-Inducing Sequence of the λ pR′ Promoter Downstream, and Replacing Displaced Sequences with the Extended −10 Consensus Insertions of 2 to 11 bp in insertion series #1 contain successive segments from the 5′ end of the sequence ATTGGTAGTGA inserted before +1 of the wild-type sequence; the 1 bp insertion of series #1 has T inserted between +1 and +2. The variant 8 bp insertion is AATTACTC placed before +1, and two variant 10 bp insertions are GGAATTACTC (#2) and AAGGTTACTC (#3), both placed before +1. The +6 extended −10 consensus insertion contains TTATGCTATAAT replacing the wild-type sequence from +1 to +6; the +10 extended −10 consensus insertion (template X10#1con) is described in Figure 3; the +20 extended −10 consensus insertion contains ATTGGTAGTGAATTATATGCTATAAT, substituted for the wild-type pR′ sequence from +1 to +6. Templates were PCR copies made with the primer described for synthesis of heteroduplex bubble templates. The “fraction RNA polymerase paused per minute” is the sum for all sampled times (0.5′, 1′, 2′, 5′, 10′) of the mole fraction of transcripts at the pause site, divided by the total time of the reaction; it is an arbitrary measure that gives weight to both the fraction captured at the pause and the half-time of the pause. A substantially similar view is obtained by plotting the fraction that decays between 0.5 min and 5 min, or the fraction initially captured at 0.5 min. Error bars indicate variance over several experiments. Cell  , DOI: ( /S (00)80121-X)

6 Figure 4 The +16/17 Pause Transcript Depends upon the Presence of σ70, and upon the Pause-Inducing Sequence, in Transcription from Bubble Templates Templates were PCR products made and transcribed as described. The substituent sequence was ATCTCGACTGAGT in place of the wild-type TAAATTTGACTCA in positions −12 to +1 of the nontemplate strand mutant bubble, or ACTCAGTCGAGAT in place of the wild-type TGAGTCAAATTTA in the template strand mutant bubble. (A) Transcripts of both bubbles by RNA polymerase holoenzyme (+σ70) and core (−σ70), compared with pause transcripts of wild-type DNA. The prominent runoff derives from rightward initiation at the bubble; a larger leftward transcript (not shown) is present at ⩽20% of this level. (B) Transcripts of nontemplate strand altered 13 bp bubbles, as above, but with the (double-stranded) pausing sequence displaced downstream by a 6 bp insertion, and converted to consensus −10 sequence (in these bubbles TTATGCTATAAT—with consensus elements underlined—replaces nucleotides +1 to +6 of the wild-type sequence); and a bubble with a +6 T to G change in the nontemplate strand of the early transcribed segment. This single base heteroduplex at +6 of the nontemplate strand is expected to express the nonpausing mutant phenotype (Ring and Roberts 1994). (C) Effect of σ70 fragments on pausing at +16/+17 in the wild-type configuration, and at +23 in the extended −10 sequence with 6 bp insert. Numbers at top designate amino acids present in σ70 fragments; the 360–528 fragment also contains GST fused to its N-terminus (Dombroski et al. 1992). Cell  , DOI: ( /S (00)80121-X)

7 Figure 4 The +16/17 Pause Transcript Depends upon the Presence of σ70, and upon the Pause-Inducing Sequence, in Transcription from Bubble Templates Templates were PCR products made and transcribed as described. The substituent sequence was ATCTCGACTGAGT in place of the wild-type TAAATTTGACTCA in positions −12 to +1 of the nontemplate strand mutant bubble, or ACTCAGTCGAGAT in place of the wild-type TGAGTCAAATTTA in the template strand mutant bubble. (A) Transcripts of both bubbles by RNA polymerase holoenzyme (+σ70) and core (−σ70), compared with pause transcripts of wild-type DNA. The prominent runoff derives from rightward initiation at the bubble; a larger leftward transcript (not shown) is present at ⩽20% of this level. (B) Transcripts of nontemplate strand altered 13 bp bubbles, as above, but with the (double-stranded) pausing sequence displaced downstream by a 6 bp insertion, and converted to consensus −10 sequence (in these bubbles TTATGCTATAAT—with consensus elements underlined—replaces nucleotides +1 to +6 of the wild-type sequence); and a bubble with a +6 T to G change in the nontemplate strand of the early transcribed segment. This single base heteroduplex at +6 of the nontemplate strand is expected to express the nonpausing mutant phenotype (Ring and Roberts 1994). (C) Effect of σ70 fragments on pausing at +16/+17 in the wild-type configuration, and at +23 in the extended −10 sequence with 6 bp insert. Numbers at top designate amino acids present in σ70 fragments; the 360–528 fragment also contains GST fused to its N-terminus (Dombroski et al. 1992). Cell  , DOI: ( /S (00)80121-X)

8 Figure 4 The +16/17 Pause Transcript Depends upon the Presence of σ70, and upon the Pause-Inducing Sequence, in Transcription from Bubble Templates Templates were PCR products made and transcribed as described. The substituent sequence was ATCTCGACTGAGT in place of the wild-type TAAATTTGACTCA in positions −12 to +1 of the nontemplate strand mutant bubble, or ACTCAGTCGAGAT in place of the wild-type TGAGTCAAATTTA in the template strand mutant bubble. (A) Transcripts of both bubbles by RNA polymerase holoenzyme (+σ70) and core (−σ70), compared with pause transcripts of wild-type DNA. The prominent runoff derives from rightward initiation at the bubble; a larger leftward transcript (not shown) is present at ⩽20% of this level. (B) Transcripts of nontemplate strand altered 13 bp bubbles, as above, but with the (double-stranded) pausing sequence displaced downstream by a 6 bp insertion, and converted to consensus −10 sequence (in these bubbles TTATGCTATAAT—with consensus elements underlined—replaces nucleotides +1 to +6 of the wild-type sequence); and a bubble with a +6 T to G change in the nontemplate strand of the early transcribed segment. This single base heteroduplex at +6 of the nontemplate strand is expected to express the nonpausing mutant phenotype (Ring and Roberts 1994). (C) Effect of σ70 fragments on pausing at +16/+17 in the wild-type configuration, and at +23 in the extended −10 sequence with 6 bp insert. Numbers at top designate amino acids present in σ70 fragments; the 360–528 fragment also contains GST fused to its N-terminus (Dombroski et al. 1992). Cell  , DOI: ( /S (00)80121-X)

9 Figure 5 σ70 Is Present in Complexes Stopped at the Pausing Site of λ and 82 Promoter Segments, But Reduced in Amount about 5-fold when the Pause-Inducing Sequence Is Altered Complexes were made and analyzed as described; a photograph of a silver-stained SDS gel is shown. The σ70 content relative to RNA polymerase holoenzyme standard is shown. The λ sequences have been described (Yarnell and Roberts 1992). The phage 82 sequence is a variant with transcript cytidines removed up to +25, so that complexes stopped at the pause site can be constructed. Mutants of this variant are a deletion at +11, which removes the highly conserved T at +14 of the natural transcript (see Figure 2), and a +10G change of this site; both are defective in pausing (W. S. Y. and J. W. R., unpublished data). Cell  , DOI: ( /S (00)80121-X)

10 Figure 7 Model of σ70 Function in Promoter Opening and Pausing, and the Interaction λ Q Protein with the Paused Complex Details are described in the text. (A), (B), and (C) represent formation of closed promoter complex, open promoter complex, and paused complex; (D) represents the interaction of λ Q protein with the paused complex. Region 2 of σ70 is placed to bind the upstream end of the extended −10 consensus as duplex DNA, in agreement with KMnO4 mapping (Kainz and Roberts 1992). A pronounced stop in upstream exonuclease digestion characteristic of complex containing the wild-type pause sequence (Yarnell and Roberts 1992) could reflect such a structure. Cell  , DOI: ( /S (00)80121-X)


Download ppt "Brian Z Ring, William S Yarnell, Jeffrey W Roberts  Cell "

Similar presentations


Ads by Google