1. New Dynamic Rotamer Libraries: Data-Driven Analysis of Side-Chain Conformational Propensities 
Clare-Louise Towse, Steven J. Rysavy, Ivan M. Vulovic, Valerie Daggett 
Structure 
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages (January 2016)
DOI: /j.str
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

2. Structure 2016 24, 187-199DOI: (10.1016/j.str.2015.10.017)
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

3. Figure 1 NMR Order Parameters Reproduction
(A) Histogram of order parameters comparing experiment and calculated values from Dynameomics simulations. Correlation coefficients between experiment and simulation are inset.
(B) Example of the relationship between rotamer occupancy and order parameter for the primary, secondary, and tertiary rotamers of Val Cγ methyl groups.
Structure  , DOI: ( /j.str )
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

4. Figure 2
Comparison between Experiment and MD and Rotamer Prediction for Ubiquitin
(A) Summary of experimental datasets and simulation; note that 5-Å NOE cutoff was used. RMSD, root-mean-square deviation.
(B) Experimental and simulated 13Cα chemical shifts and amide S2 order parameters. RMSD, root-mean-square deviation.
(C) Positions of the Gln2 and Thr14 side chains in the X-ray structure that fail to satisfy the NOE-derived distances (highlighted in green) and the rotamer predicted from the BBDEP library with those interactions now highlighted in orange.
Structure  , DOI: ( /j.str )
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

5. Figure 3
Comparison of the ϕ/ψ Coverage for the Dynameomics and RL2010 Structural Datasets
(A) Ramachandran plots for the raw structural datasets underlying the rotamer libraries and the difference between the two datasets. The unpopulated regions toward the bottom of the Dynameomics plot are only populated when including Gly and Ala, which are omitted here as they do not contribute to the rotamer library. While the difference plot appears to be the Dynameomics plot because of the much more extensive sampling in Dynameomics, there is a difference: a single bin where both datasets had only one sample, marked by arrows.
(B) Definition of secondary structure regions overlaid for the Dynameomics dataset; the ϕ/ψ limits of these regions are given in the Experimental Procedures. Dynameomics maximum populations: αR region 6.25 × 107 (bin: −62.5°, −42.5°); β region 8.62 × 106 (bin: −67.5°, 147.5°); reverse α ↔ β bridge: 1.32 × 104 (bin: −82.5°, −107.5°). RL2010 maximum populations: αR region, 2.79 × 104 (bin: −62.5°, −42.5°); β region, 2,618 (bin: −62.5°, 142.5°); reverse α ↔ β bridge: 5 (bin: −87.5°, −112.5°).
Structure  , DOI: ( /j.str )
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

6. Figure 4
Topological Bias of Experimental Structures Used in Rotamer Library Creation
Proteomic Ramachandran plot histograms of the PDB structures used in both the RL2010 and Dynameomics rotamer libraries showing the distribution of proteins in terms of their average ϕ/ψ angles. As the coverage of ϕ/ψ space by L-amino acid-containing proteins is essentially constrained to negative values, only the left halves of the plots are shown.
Structure  , DOI: ( /j.str )
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

7. Figure 5
Independent Rotamer Probabilities and χ1 Dihedral Angle Distribution for Val
Histogram of χ1 dihedral angles for all Val residues in the Dynameomics dataset. Rotameric populations are labeled with the backbone-independent probabilities and the definition of the trans (t), gauche+ (g+), and gauche− (g−) states inset. See also Table S1.
Structure  , DOI: ( /j.str )
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

8. Figure 6
Backbone-Dependent Versus Backbone-Independent Probabilities for Val
Differences in the probabilities related to the Val ϕ/ψ distributions are given for side chains in the (A) t, (B) g−, and (C) g+ rotameric states. Well-populated regions are highlighted, and labeled and representative structures are displayed on the right. The plots range from a 0% to 100% backbone-dependent probability on a logarithmic scale, and are colored by the change in magnitude of the number of instances when compared with the backbone-independent library; e.g., pink represents a dependent probability of 0% instances of side-chain conformations. The BBDEP rotamer preferences of other residues across ϕ/ψ bins are shown in Figures S1 and S2.
Structure  , DOI: ( /j.str )
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

9. Figure 7 Rotameric Bin Definitions and Dihedral Angle Distributions
(A) Dihedral angle ranges that define rotameric states.
(B) Polar dihedral angle distributions and rotameric bin populations from trajectories of all residues within the Dynameomics dataset. For each amino acid and side-chain dihedral angle, the polar distribution of the angle is shown surrounded by donut plots shaded by population.
See also Table S2.
Structure  , DOI: ( /j.str )
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

10. Figure 8
RSS Probabilities for Ile, Ser, and Thr Compared with the Probabilities for the Top Three BBIND Rotamers
The BBIND probabilities are provided in the lower right quadrant and the RSS probabilities are inset in the same order in the appropriate secondary structural regions, as defined in Figure 4, with the most probable rotamers in bold. See also Table S1 for RSS probabilities.
Structure  , DOI: ( /j.str )
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

11. Figure 9
Comparison of Most Probable Rotamer for all Amino Acids Taken from the BBIND and RSS Libraries
Rotamer color classifications are inset alongside the plots. Correspondence with the BBIND library is blue in each case.
Structure  , DOI: ( /j.str )
Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions