1. A Scientific Perspective

2. Basics of the scientific perspective
Problem = we don’t know enough about the problem
Solution = get more information about it
Information will allow us to identify problems an that will prompt a response
Technology will provide means to drive down pollution intensity enough to overcome population and affluence contributions.
Changes in values aren’t needed.
“Information deficit” model: the obstacle to environmental protection is a lack of information. Does this ring true to you?

3. General points on science
Values involved
Science contributes to political process
Uncertainty plays important role
"Science in politics" as a participative process

4. Roles of Scientists Trend spotters Theory builders Theory testers
Science communicators
Applied policy analysts

5. Scientific Assessments
Aggregate “State of the Science” reports
Increasingly common on environmental issues
Scientific but representative process
Wield influence when
Salient (relevant)
Credible (expertise and trustworthiness)
Legitimate (viewed as fair)

6. When do states take action on an environmental problem?
Scientific knowledge
Salient issue
Costs and benefits
Incidence of costs and benefits
Political and institutional context

7. How SHOULD we prioritize action?
Discussion