Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Comparison of monopolar hemostatic forceps with soft coagulation versus hemoclip for peptic ulcer bleeding: a randomized trial (with video)  Bilal Toka,

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Comparison of monopolar hemostatic forceps with soft coagulation versus hemoclip for peptic ulcer bleeding: a randomized trial (with video)  Bilal Toka,"— Presentation transcript:

1 Comparison of monopolar hemostatic forceps with soft coagulation versus hemoclip for peptic ulcer bleeding: a randomized trial (with video)  Bilal Toka, MD, Ahmet Tarik Eminler, Cengiz Karacaer, MD, Mustafa Ihsan Uslan, Aydin Seref Koksal, Erkan Parlak  Gastrointestinal Endoscopy  Volume 89, Issue 4, Pages (April 2019) DOI: /j.gie Copyright © 2019 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Terms and Conditions

2 Figure 1 Hemoclip treatment. A, A visible vessel is seen at the edge of an ulcer on the lesser curvature of the antrum. B, It is effectively grasped with a hemoclip to achieve hemostasis. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy  , DOI: ( /j.gie ) Copyright © 2019 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Terms and Conditions

3 Figure 2 Application of MHFSC to an oozing visible vessel with a diameter smaller than 2 mm. A, Ulcer with an oozing vessel is seen on the anterior wall of the bulbus. B, MHFSC is applied to the center of the vessel after epinephrine injection. C, Immediately after hemostasis. D, Five days after hemostasis. MHFSC, Monopolar hemostatic forceps with soft coagulation. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy  , DOI: ( /j.gie ) Copyright © 2019 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Terms and Conditions

4 Figure 3 Application of MHFSC to an oozing visible vessel with a diameter larger than 2 mm. A, Ulcer with an oozing vessel is seen on the anterior wall of the bulbus. B, Epinephrine is injected initially. C, The center of the vessel was coagulated after coagulation was ensured at 4 edges of the vessel (4+1 contact method). D, Immediately after hemostasis. MHFSC, Monopolar hemostatic forceps with soft coagulation. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy  , DOI: ( /j.gie ) Copyright © 2019 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Terms and Conditions

5 Figure 4 Flow diagram of the study population. INR, International normalized ratio; PLT, platelet; MHFSC, monopolar hemostatic forceps with soft coagulation; HC, hemoclip. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy  , DOI: ( /j.gie ) Copyright © 2019 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Terms and Conditions

6 Figure 5 Results of endoscopic treatments. MHFSC, Monopolar hemostatic forceps with soft coagulation; HC, hemoclip. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy  , DOI: ( /j.gie ) Copyright © 2019 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Terms and Conditions


Download ppt "Comparison of monopolar hemostatic forceps with soft coagulation versus hemoclip for peptic ulcer bleeding: a randomized trial (with video)  Bilal Toka,"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google