1. Motions for 2007/05 Date: 2007-05-14 Authors: May 2007 Month Year
doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0
May 2007
Motions for 2007/05
Date:
Authors:
Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein.
Release: The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE
Patent Policy and Procedures: The contributor is familiar with the IEEE 802 Patent Policy and Procedures < ieee802.org/guides/bylaws/sb-bylaws.pdf>, including the statement "IEEE standards may include the known use of patent(s), including patent applications, provided the IEEE receives assurance from the patent holder or applicant with respect to patents essential for compliance with both mandatory and optional portions of the standard." Early disclosure to the Working Group of patent information that might be relevant to the standard is essential to reduce the possibility for delays in the development process and increase the likelihood that the draft publication will be approved for publication. Please notify the Chair as early as possible, in written or electronic form, if patented technology (or technology under patent application) might be incorporated into a draft standard being developed within the IEEE Working Group. If you have questions, contact the IEEE Patent Committee Administrator at
Clint Chaplin, TGr Chair
John Doe, Some Company

2. Abstract Motions for 2007/05 May 2007 Month Year
doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0
May 2007
Abstract
Motions for 2007/05
Clint Chaplin, TGr Chair
John Doe, Some Company

3. Straw Poll: Result: Yes - ; No - ; Abstain - . May 2007
Clint Chaplin, TGr Chair

4. Result: Yes - 12; No - 0; Abstain - 4. Carries
May 2007
MOTION: Accept the proposed comment resolutions in r-d5-comments.xls in Group #1.
By: Bill Marshall
Second: Jouni Malinen
Result: Yes - 12; No - 0; Abstain - 4.
Carries
Clint Chaplin, TGr Chair

5. Result: Yes - 9; No - 0; Abstain – 4. Carries
May 2007
MOTION: Reject comments identified with a “0” in Column J and a “0” in Column K in r-d5-comments.xls as "Rejected. The text referenced in the comment is not a proper subject of this recirculation ballot. This comment will be submitted by the task group chair during the initial sponsor ballot."
By: Bill Marshall
Second: Kapil Sood
Result: Yes - 9; No - 0; Abstain – 4.
Carries
Clint Chaplin, TGr Chair

6. Result: Yes - 7; No - 0; Abstain – 4. Carries
May 2007
MOTION: Reject comments #601 and #651 in r-d5-comments.xls as "Rejected. The text referenced in the comment is not a proper subject of this recirculation ballot. This comment will be submitted by the task group chair during the initial sponsor ballot."
By: Bill Marshall
Second: Kapil Sood
Result: Yes - 7; No - 0; Abstain – 4.
Carries
Clint Chaplin, TGr Chair

7. Second: Michael Montemurro Result: Yes - 8; No - 0; Abstain - 5.
May 2007
MOTION: Accept the proposed comment resolutions in r-d5-comments.xls in Groups #2, #3, #4, and #5 except those identified with a “0” in Column J and a “0” in Column K and except for comments 601, 651 and 469.
By: Bill Marshall
Second: Michael Montemurro
Result: Yes - 8; No - 0; Abstain - 5.
Carries
Clint Chaplin, TGr Chair

8. Result: Yes - ; No - ; Abstain - .
May 2007
MOTION to amend: To resolve comments #520 and #530 in r-d5-comments.xls as, “Rejected. (1) The reassociation deadline is measured in TUs, and is by default only one second. Additional complexity at the AP for making a provisional reservation, and then converting it to an actual allocation at reassociation is not worthwhile. (2) Concern about the time required at the AP to convert a provisional reservation to a resource allocation, and whether the Fast BSS Transition would complete within the desired interval. (3) The AP already has mechanisms available to it to reject a reassociation due to lack of resources (e.g. Status Code 33). (4) Accepting the reassociation but denying the reservation would delete the STA’s association with it’s previous AP, which could still be providing adequate QoS while the STA searches for another transition candidate. (5) Fast BSS Transition resource reservation mechanisms make use of existing IEEE mechanisms, and to the extent that those only provide provisional guarantees, the same is provided by this amendment.”
By: Kapil Sood
Second: No second
Result: Yes - ; No - ; Abstain - .
Clint Chaplin, TGr Chair

9. Second: Michael Montemurro Result: Yes - 10; No - 0; Abstain - 4.
May 2007
MOTION: To resolve comments #520 and #530 in r-d5-comments.xls as, “Rejected. (1) The reassociation deadline is measured in TUs, and is by default only one second. Additional complexity at the AP for making a provisional reservation, and then converting it to an actual allocation at reassociation is not worthwhile. (2) Concern about the time required at the AP to convert a provisional reservation to a resource allocation, and whether the Fast BSS Transition would complete within the desired interval. (3) The AP already has mechanisms available to it to reject a reassociation due to lack of resources (e.g. Status Code 33). (4) Accepting the reassociation but denying the reservation would delete the STA’s association with it’s previous AP, which could still be providing adequate QoS while the STA searches for another transition candidate. (5) Fast BSS Transition resource reservation mechanisms make use of existing IEEE mechanisms, and to the extent that those only provide provisional guarantees, the same is provided by this amendment.”
By: Rajneesh Kumar
Second: Michael Montemurro
Result: Yes - 10; No - 0; Abstain - 4.
Carries
Clint Chaplin, TGr Chair

10. Result: Yes - 11; No - 0; Abstain - 3. Carries
May 2007
MOTION: Accept the proposed comment resolution in column Q in r-d5-comments.xls in CID 469.
By: Rajneesh Kumar
Second: Kapil Sood
Result: Yes - 11; No - 0; Abstain - 3.
Carries
Clint Chaplin, TGr Chair

11. Second: Michael Montemurro Result: Yes - ; No - ; Abstain - .
May 2007
MOTION: To accept option (1) of the proposed resolutions in column Q of CID 236 in r-d5-comments.xls and to accept the proposed resolution in column Q of the other comments in Issue #56.
By: Rajneesh Kumar
Second: Michael Montemurro
Result: Yes - ; No - ; Abstain - .
Clint Chaplin, TGr Chair

12. Result: Yes - 13; No - 0; Abstain - 4. Carries
May 2007
MOTION to amend: To accept option (1) of the proposed resolutions in column Q of CID 236 in r-d5-comments.xls and to accept the proposed resolution in column Q of the other comments in Issue #56 and to accept option (2) in column Q of CID 318.
By: Bill Marshall
Second: Jouni Malinen
Result: Yes - 13; No - 0; Abstain - 4.
Carries
Clint Chaplin, TGr Chair

13. Second: Dorothy Stanley Result: Yes - 4; No - 9; Abstain - 7. Fails
May 2007
MOTION to amend: To accept option (3) of the proposed resolutions in column Q of CID 236 in r-d5-comments.xls and to accept the proposed resolution in column Q of the other comments in Issue #56 and to accept option (2) in column Q of CID 318.
By: Jouni Malinen
Second: Dorothy Stanley
Result: Yes - 4; No - 9; Abstain - 7.
Fails
Clint Chaplin, TGr Chair

14. Second: Michael Montemurro Result: Yes - 16; No - 4; Abstain - 1.
May 2007
MOTION: To accept option (1) of the proposed resolutions in column Q of CID 236 in r-d5-comments.xls and to accept the proposed resolution in column Q of the other comments in Issue #56 and to accept option (2) in column Q of CID 318.
By: Rajneesh Kumar
Second: Michael Montemurro
Result: Yes - 16; No - 4; Abstain - 1.
Carries
Clint Chaplin, TGr Chair

15. Result: Yes - 4; No - 11; Abstain - 5. Fails
May 2007
MOTION: Resolve comment 238 in r-d5-comments.xls by accepting the proposed resolution in Column P.
By: Dorothy Stanley
Second: Jouni Malinen
Result: Yes - 4; No - 11; Abstain - 5.
Fails
Clint Chaplin, TGr Chair

16. Result: Yes - 13; No - 0; Abstain - 6. Carries
May 2007
MOTION: To resolve comment 238 in r-d5-comments.xls with “Reject. “Within the same mobility domain” does not imply that pre-authentication is defined by this amendment.”
By: Rajneesh Kumar
Second: Kapil Sood
Result: Yes - 13; No - 0; Abstain - 6.
Carries
Clint Chaplin, TGr Chair

17. Second: Dorothy Stanley Result: Yes - 8; No - 0; Abstain - 8. Carries
May 2007
MOTION: To accept option (1) of submission r-key-holder-architecture-clean-up.doc and instruct the editor to incorporate the editing instructions into the draft, and to resolve comment 380 with “Accept. Document r-key-holder-architecture-clean-up.doc accepted.”
By: Rajneesh Kumar
Second: Dorothy Stanley
Result: Yes - 8; No - 0; Abstain - 8.
Carries
Clint Chaplin, TGr Chair

18. Result: Yes - 12; No - 0; Abstain - 2. Carries
May 2007
MOTION: Approve the contents of r-d5-comments.xls as the comment resolutions for Letter Ballot 98.
By: Bill Marshall
Second: Kapil Sood
Result: Yes - 12; No - 0; Abstain - 2.
Carries
Clint Chaplin, TGr Chair

19. Result: Yes - 13; No - 0; Abstain - 1. Carries
May 2007
MOTION: Motion to request technical editor to create an updated IEEE r draft 6.0.
By: Kapil Sood
Second: Bill Marshall
Result: Yes - 13; No - 0; Abstain - 1.
Carries
Clint Chaplin, TGr Chair

20. Result: Yes - 13; No - 0; Abstain - 1. Carries
May 2007
MOTION to amend something previously adopted: Approve the contents of r-d5-comments.xls as the comment resolutions for Letter Ballot 98.
By: Bill Marshall
Second: Jouni Malinen
Result: Yes - 13; No - 0; Abstain - 1.
Carries
Clint Chaplin, TGr Chair

21. Result: Yes - ; No - ; Abstain - .
May 2007
MOTION:
By:
Second:
Result: Yes - ; No - ; Abstain - .
Clint Chaplin, TGr Chair

22. Second: Michael Montemurro Result: Yes - 12; No - 0; Abstain - 2.
May 2007
MOTION: Moved: Having addressed all comments arising from LB98, Task Group r resolves to forward r draft 6.0 to the working group for the purpose of conducting a 15-day working group recirculation letter ballot.  The purpose of the working group recirculation letter ballot is to forward the draft to sponsor ballot. –The text of the motion to be presented to the working group will be “Move to authorize a 15-day Working Group Recirculation Letter Ballot of r draft 6.0, asking the question “Should the r draft 6.0 be forwarded to sponsor ballot?””
By: Kapil Sood
Second: Michael Montemurro
Result: Yes - 12; No - 0; Abstain - 2.
Clint Chaplin, TGr Chair

23. Result: Yes - ; No - ; Abstain - .
May 2007
MOTION: Hold a IEEE TGr ad-hoc meeting August xx through August xx, 2007 in xxxxxx
By:
Second:
Result: Yes - ; No - ; Abstain - .
Clint Chaplin, TGr Chair

24. Result: Yes - ; No - ; Abstain - .
May 2007
MOTION:
By:
Second:
Result: Yes - ; No - ; Abstain - .
Clint Chaplin, TGr Chair

25. May 2007
References
Clint Chaplin, TGr Chair