Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byYanti Sutedja Modified over 5 years ago
1
Figure 1 Movement of 10 individuals during the last 5000 time steps of 2 example simulations, without (a) or with (b) ... Figure 1 Movement of 10 individuals during the last 5000 time steps of 2 example simulations, without (a) or with (b) public information. Each individual’s trajectory is represented with a different color and different line width to ease visualization. Individuals have established stable traplines and routinely cover their entire personal circuit several times during the time window (movement speed is 1 u per time step and each patch visit lasts for one time step). In the population with public information, 9 individuals out of 10 have aggregated and use the same movement circuit, their movement tracks are thus superimposed. Note that the movement of aggregated individuals is not synchronous along the circuit (see Supplementary Figure S1 in Supplementary Information 1). Black points represent resource patches. Parameters were set to A<sub>0</sub> = 4π, T<sub>W</sub> = 200, T<sub>R</sub> = 1,000, B = 500, d = 50. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model ( Behav Ecol, Volume 30, Issue 2, 21 December 2018, Pages 408–416, The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.
2
Figure 2 Aggregation metrics depending on the population size
Figure 2 Aggregation metrics depending on the population size. (a) Distribution of the degree of overlap per couple, ... Figure 2 Aggregation metrics depending on the population size. (a) Distribution of the degree of overlap per couple, depending on the number of individuals in populations of public information users. The plain line represents the median pairwise overlap. The triangles represent the median pairwise overlap in populations without public information. The widths of the distribution plots in the horizontal direction represent the relative frequency of a particular pairwise overlap value for a particular population size. (b) Mean ± SD number of groups of individuals divided by the number of individuals within the population. Circles and triangles: populations of individuals using public information or not, respectively. 1,000 simulations per population size. Parameters were set to A<sub>0</sub> = 4π, T<sub>W</sub> = 200, T<sub>R</sub> = 1,000, B = 500, d = 50. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model ( Behav Ecol, Volume 30, Issue 2, 21 December 2018, Pages 408–416, The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.
3
Figure 3 Aggregation metrics depending on the information broadcast parameters. (a) Median pairwise overlap and (b) ... Figure 3 Aggregation metrics depending on the information broadcast parameters. (a) Median pairwise overlap and (b) mean number of groups per population. 10 individuals in each population. 100 simulations per parameter condition. Other parameters were set to A<sub>0</sub> = 4π, T<sub>W</sub> = 200, T<sub>R</sub> = 1,000. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model ( Behav Ecol, Volume 30, Issue 2, 21 December 2018, Pages 408–416, The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.
4
Figure 4 Mean ± SD intake of individuals using public information (circles) or not (triangles), during the first (a) ... Figure 4 Mean ± SD intake of individuals using public information (circles) or not (triangles), during the first (a) and the last (b) 5000 time step-windows of the simulation, depending on the population size. The variation shown is the standard deviation of the mean intake between simulations. 1,000 simulations per population size. Parameters were set to A<sub>0</sub> = 4π, T<sub>W</sub> = 200, T<sub>R</sub> = 1,000, B = 500, d = 50. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model ( Behav Ecol, Volume 30, Issue 2, 21 December 2018, Pages 408–416, The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.
5
Figure 5 Mean intake of public information users during the first (a) and the last (b) 5000 time steps of 10 simulated ... Figure 5 Mean intake of public information users during the first (a) and the last (b) 5000 time steps of 10 simulated individuals divided by the mean intake of individuals that do not use public information, depending on the broadcast area and the information persistence time. 100 simulations per parameter condition. Other parameters were set to A<sub>0</sub> = 4π, T<sub>W</sub> = 200, T<sub>R</sub> = 1,000. Unless provided in the caption above, the following copyright applies to the content of this slide: © The Author(s) Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model ( Behav Ecol, Volume 30, Issue 2, 21 December 2018, Pages 408–416, The content of this slide may be subject to copyright: please see the slide notes for details.
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.