1. Imaging pain British Journal of Anaesthesia
I. Tracey 
British Journal of Anaesthesia 
Volume 101, Issue 1, Pages (July 2008)
DOI: /bja/aen102
Copyright © 2008 British Journal of Anaesthesia Terms and Conditions

2. Fig 1
A schematic displaying the neurophysiological correlates of neural activity and techniques used to detect that particular signal. EEG, electroencephalography; MEG, magnetoencephalography; FDG-PET, flurodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography; H215O-PET, water based positron emission tomography; NIRS, near infrared spectroscopy; FMRI, functional magnetic resonance imaging.
British Journal of Anaesthesia  , 32-39DOI: ( /bja/aen102)
Copyright © 2008 British Journal of Anaesthesia Terms and Conditions

3. Fig 2
A schematic displaying the relationship between the spatial and temporal resolution in terms of their invasiveness for the current imaging tools commonly used.
British Journal of Anaesthesia  , 32-39DOI: ( /bja/aen102)
Copyright © 2008 British Journal of Anaesthesia Terms and Conditions

4. Fig 3
Schematic illustrating the main factors that influence nociceptive inputs affecting pain perception.
British Journal of Anaesthesia  , 32-39DOI: ( /bja/aen102)
Copyright © 2008 British Journal of Anaesthesia Terms and Conditions

5. Fig 4
Neuroanatomy of pain processing. Main brain regions that activate during a painful experience are highlighted as bilaterally active but with more dominant activation on the contralateral hemisphere (red).
British Journal of Anaesthesia  , 32-39DOI: ( /bja/aen102)
Copyright © 2008 British Journal of Anaesthesia Terms and Conditions