Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

States Comparative Politics.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "States Comparative Politics."— Presentation transcript:

1 States Comparative Politics

2 How do countries create and maintain political power?
States Intro How do countries create and maintain political power?

3 States Mini Case Study Pakistan - 2013
Pakistan Muslim League sweeps elections, making Nawaz Sharif prime minister First time ever that one democratically elected government handed power over to another Every other transfer of power had been martial law or military coup since 1947 Pakistan is unable to meet the electricity needs of its people. Poor management, inability to collect payments lead to half of all electricity produced being stolen State is weak. State lacks capacity.

4 States Comparative Politics

5 States Define States Have a monopoly of violence over a territory
Has sovereignty Population, Territory, Government, Sovereignty Have a set of institutions to make & carry out policy Are typically highly institutionalized

6 States Sovereignty Sovereignty
The ability to carry out actions and policies within a territory independent of external actors Indicates than an actor is the primary authority over a territory If a state cannot defend its territory or faces powerful opponents within its territory, its policies will be undermined Must have army and police force to maintain sovereignty

7 States States State Institutions that seek to wield force within a territory – maintaining order and deterring challengers (inside or out) Set of institutions that society deems necessary to achieve its goals such as: police, taxes, judiciary The state is almost permanent. The regime seems permanent to people in a state, but can change in extreme circumstances

8 States Regime Regime The political system of a state
Fundamental rules and norms of politics Endure beyond individual governments Long term goals that guide the state. Ex: where power resides, how power is used, freedom vs equality

9 States Regime Regime Democratic Regime Nondemocratic Regime
Most basic level = democratic or nondemocratic Democratic Regime Nondemocratic Regime Rules and norms of politics give public a large role Limits public participation and favors those in power There are rights and liberties for individuals In some places may just refer to the leader himself

10 Often embodied in a constitution
States Regime Regimes are… Norms and rules regarding freedom and collective equality, the locus of power, and the use of that power Institutionalized but can be changed by dramatic events like a revolution Categorized at the most basic level as either democratic or authoritarian Often embodied in a constitution

11 States Governments Government Leadership that runs the state
Holds particular ideas about goals like freedom vs equality Make and carry out policies Must work within the existing regime that has build up over time

12 States A government is.. Government
Leadership or elites in charge of running the state Weakly institutionalized Limited by the existing regime Often composed of elected officials, such as a president, or unelected officials such as a monarch

13 States Comparing the three

14 States Comparing the three State Regime Government A computer
The operating system – the programming that defines the capabilities Government The individual user – who is operating the machinery

15 States States

16 Origins of States States

17 States Origins Origins of the State
Sedentary humans in the Middle East allowed complex political systems to form Food surpluses led to population increase, trade, inequality, competition States emerge out of violence. Conquering of others or groups coming together to better defend. Earliest states include taxes, bureaucracy, laws, militaries, leadership, economic planning

18 States Endogenity Urbanization or state building?
Did leadership cause urbanization by building complex institutions that attracted people? Urbanization or state building? Did urbanization cause political institutions to form? Did these institutionalize simultaneously?

19 States Origins of state Hobbes Rousseau
Thinks humans submitted to authority in order to overcome anarchy – giving up their rights to gain security Hobbes Negative view of human nature – this system ensures neither freedom nor equality Humans create a social contract to create a system of authority that helps them meet their collective needs Rousseau Human nature is instinctively compassionate & egalitarian. The state corrupted them by imposing inequality

20 Modern States Modern State Rome collapses Fragmentation Modern states
Anarchy in Europe Political organizations develop Reaction to crime Infrastructure disappears Constant competition Groups survive or are absorbed Crime dominates Strength controls terrirory Control more profitable than crime

21 Modern States Europe vs. China Europe China
Ethnically & linguistically fragmented Centralized for a thousand years already Geographic boundaries prevent one large empire No geographic boundaries to stop growth Small competing local governments form Highly developed with no rivals for power

22 Modern States Advantages States encourage economic development
Rulers made law that protected private property Gave the state more resources to tax Encouraged people to earn profits Helped states build stronger armies

23 Modern States Advantages States encourage technological innovation
Stimulated even further economic development A function of competition for cultural dominance Viewed new tech as way to enhance power

24 Modern States Advantages Domestic stability
Increased trade and commerce Commerce facilitated common language and shared identity Allowed the development of infrastructure Ethnicity became an asset for the state

25 Modern States Spread Modern states in 1500 Consequences
20% of countries Religious rivals lost political power Had better technology and economic resources Economic growth led to colonizing other states Had developed ideas of national identity Organizational structure of modern state imposed on rest of world

26 Legitimacy States

27 Legitimacy What is it? Legitimacy People recognize something as right.
A legitimate institution is widely accepted by the public Allows institutions to have power without having to rely only on force People obey rules even when the threat of punishment is small. Power relies on the consent of the people

28 Legitimacy Traditional Traditional Legitimacy
Built over a long period of time. Rituals and ceremonies help reinforce legitimacy Ex: monarchy ruled by one family Has power of history on its side

29 Legitimacy Charismatic Charismatic Legitimacy Based on power of
ideas or beliefs Typically embodied by persuasive individuals Ex: Muhammad, Hitler Not institutionalized, dies with the person

30 Legitimacy Rational Legal Rational-Legal Legitimacy
Based on system of laws and procedures Officials gain legitimacy through the rules Ex: Barack Obama Legitimacy belongs to the office, not person

31 Centralization States

32 Centralization Control of territory How to they control? unitary
Political power is concentrated at national level – local authority is limited federal Some powers are devolved to regional bodies or local legislatures confederation Most power is controlled by regional bodies

33 Centralization Unitary States Unitary States Benefits Drawbacks
Central govt has more capacity to solve problems Too much centralization can be dangerous Can allow local interests to be marginalized Territorial divisions are still allowed but they have no political power

34 Centralization Unitary States Federalism Benefits Drawbacks
Helps represent local interests better Weakens state efficiency Serves as a check on the growth of central power Can exacerbate ethnic or regional conflict

35 Centralization Federalism Asymmetric Federalism
Power is divided unevenly between regional bodies. Some have more power than others over things like tax or language rights Most likely in a country with significant ethnic divisions

36 Centralization Federalism Devolution Recent trend
Decentralization – taking power from the central government and giving it to the regional bodies Typically increases legitimacy of the state by moving more political power closer to the people. Is a way to resolve problems like ethnic or religious differences by giving power to regions where these groups are dominant.

37 Power, Autonomy, & Capacity
State

38 States Strength Strong Weak States Able to fulfil basic tasks
Cannot execute basic tasks Highly institutionalized Not well institutionalized, lack legitimacy

39 States Capacity Capacity
Ability of the state to use power to carry out basic tasks States with high capacity can make and carry out policies States with high capacity can ensure stability Requires money, organization, and effective leadership

40 States Autonomy Autonomy
Ability of the state to use its power independently of the public Autonomous states can carry out a policy without having to consult the public Act on behalf of the public, no matter what public opinion says

41 States Autonomy & Capacity High Autonomy Low Autonomy
State is able to fulfill basic tasks with minimum public intervention; power highly centralized; strong state State is able to fulfill basic tasks, but public plays a direct role in determining policy and is able to limit state power and the scope of activity High Capacity State is able to function with a minimum of public interference or direct control, but its capacity to fulfill basic tasks is limited State lacks ability to fulfill basic tasks, and is subject to direct public control and interference – power highly decentralized among state and nonstate actors, weak state Low Capacity

42 States Autonomy & Capacity High Autonomy Low Autonomy Dangers
Too high may undermine democracy State may be unable to develop new policies or respond to new challenges owing to the power of organized opposition High Capacity State is ineffectual, limiting development, and slow development may provoke public unrest Too low may lead to internal state failure Low Capacity

43 States Fragile States Failed States Fragile States
Not well institutionalized Lack legitimacy Lack capacity State structures have broken down Fragile States States that are in danger of becoming failed states

44 States Fragile States Fragile State Index What are they?
Published annually by Foreign Policy and Fund for Peace think tank Attempts to assess a state’s vulnerability to collapse Ranks all states in the UN Uses 12 indicators What are they?

45 States Fragile States Social Political Economic
Factions of elites – flawed elections, nationalized rhetoric Demographic pressure – population relative to food supply State legitimacy – corruption, transparency External Intervention – intervention by other militaries Internally Displaced Persons – refugees coming & going Public Services – disappearance of basic state functions Economic Group Grievances – tension between groups Human Rights & Rule of Law – civil liberties, press freedom Uneven Development – group based inequality, fair housing Brain drain – migration of educated population Security Apparatus – emergence of special police Poverty – per capita income, unemployment levels

46 States Fragile States

47 States Fragile States

48 States Fragile States

49 States Fragile States

50 States Fragile States

51 Mini Case Study: Pakistan Slides Towards Failure
STate

52 States Mini Case Study Why has Pakistan slid toward failure?
Read the passage In what ways has it failed to meet the definition of state? What kinds of institutions does it lack or are weak that lead to continued military rule? What is meant by describing it as an irrational state?

53 Wrap Up States

54 Main Ideas States Remember this… OR ELSE STATES VS REGIMES
Development of modern states Results of legitimacy, capacity, authority Fragile States Remember this… OR ELSE


Download ppt "States Comparative Politics."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google