1. TGad May 2010 Report Date: 2010-05-17 Authors: May 2010 April 2007
doc.: IEEE /0570r0
May 2010
TGad May 2010 Report
Date:
Authors:
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

2. May 2010
Meeting Protocol
Please announce your affiliation when you first address the group during a meeting slot
Slide 2
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

3. Register Indicate attendance Attendance
May 2010
Attendance
Register
Indicate attendance
See document r0 for more details
Slide 3
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

4. Attendance, Voting & Document Status
May 2010
Attendance, Voting & Document Status
Make sure your badges are correct
If you plan to make a submission be sure it does not contain company logos or advertising
Questions on Voting status, Ballot pool, Access to Reflector, Documentation, member’s area
see Adrian Stephens –
Cell Phones Silent or Off
Slide 4
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

5. Patent Policy Following 5 slides May 2010 April 2007
doc.: IEEE /0570r0
May 2010
Patent Policy
Following 5 slides
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

6. Instructions for the WG Chair
April 2007
doc.: IEEE /0570r0
May 2010
Instructions for the WG Chair
The IEEE-SA strongly recommends that at each WG meeting the chair or a designee:
Show slides #1 through #4 of this presentation
Advise the WG attendees that:
The IEEE’s patent policy is consistent with the ANSI patent policy and is described in Clause 6 of the IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws;
Early identification of patent claims which may be essential for the use of standards under development is strongly encouraged;
There may be Essential Patent Claims of which the IEEE is not aware. Additionally, neither the IEEE, the WG, nor the WG chair can ensure the accuracy or completeness of any assurance or whether any such assurance is, in fact, of a Patent Claim that is essential for the use of the standard under development.
Instruct the WG Secretary to record in the minutes of the relevant WG meeting:
That the foregoing information was provided and that slides 1 through 4 (and this slide 0, if applicable) were shown;
That the chair or designee provided an opportunity for participants to identify patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) and/or the holder of patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) of which the participant is personally aware and that may be essential for the use of that standard
Any responses that were given, specifically the patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) and/or the holder of the patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) that were identified (if any) and by whom.
The WG Chair shall ensure that a request is made to any identified holders of potential essential patent claim(s) to complete and submit a Letter of Assurance.
It is recommended that the WG chair review the guidance in IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual and in FAQs 12 and 12a on inclusion of potential Essential Patent Claims by incorporation or by reference.
Note: WG includes Working Groups, Task Groups, and other standards-developing committees with a PAR approved by the IEEE-SA Standards Board.
(Optional to be shown)
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

7. Participants, Patents, and Duty to Inform
April 2007
doc.: IEEE /0570r0
May 2010
Participants, Patents, and Duty to Inform
All participants in this meeting have certain obligations under the IEEE-SA Patent Policy. Participants:
“Shall inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed)” of the identity of each “holder of any potential Essential Patent Claims of which they are personally aware” if the claims are owned or controlled by the participant or the entity the participant is from, employed by, or otherwise represents
“Personal awareness” means that the participant “is personally aware that the holder may have a potential Essential Patent Claim,” even if the participant is not personally aware of the specific patents or patent claims
“Should inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed)” of the identity of “any other holders of such potential Essential Patent Claims” (that is, third parties that are not affiliated with the participant, with the participant’s employer, or with anyone else that the participant is from or otherwise represents)
The above does not apply if the patent claim is already the subject of an Accepted Letter of Assurance that applies to the proposed standard(s) under consideration by this group
Quoted text excerpted from IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws subclause 6.2
Early identification of holders of potential Essential Patent Claims is strongly encouraged
No duty to perform a patent search
Slide #1
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

8. Patent Related Links Patent Policy is stated in these sources:
April 2007
doc.: IEEE /0570r0
May 2010
Patent Related Links
All participants should be familiar with their obligations under the IEEE-SA Policies & Procedures for standards development.
Patent Policy is stated in these sources:
IEEE-SA Standards Boards Bylaws
IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual
Material about the patent policy is available at
If you have questions, contact the IEEE-SA Standards Board Patent Committee Administrator at or visit
This slide set is available at
Slide #2
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

9. Call for Potentially Essential Patents
April 2007
doc.: IEEE /0570r0
May 2010
Call for Potentially Essential Patents
If anyone in this meeting is personally aware of the holder of any patent claims that are potentially essential to implementation of the proposed standard(s) under consideration by this group and that are not already the subject of an Accepted Letter of Assurance:
Either speak up now or
Provide the chair of this group with the identity of the holder(s) of any and all such claims as soon as possible or
Cause an LOA to be submitted
Slide #3
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

10. Other Guidelines for IEEE WG Meetings
April 2007
doc.: IEEE /0570r0
May 2010
Other Guidelines for IEEE WG Meetings
All IEEE-SA standards meetings shall be conducted in compliance with all applicable laws, including antitrust and competition laws.
Don’t discuss the interpretation, validity, or essentiality of patents/patent claims.
Don’t discuss specific license rates, terms, or conditions.
Relative costs, including licensing costs of essential patent claims, of different technical approaches may be discussed in standards development meetings.
Technical considerations remain primary focus
Don’t discuss or engage in the fixing of product prices, allocation of customers, or division of sales markets.
Don’t discuss the status or substance of ongoing or threatened litigation.
Don’t be silent if inappropriate topics are discussed … do formally object.
See IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual, clause and “Promoting Competition and Innovation: What You Need to Know about the IEEE Standards Association's Antitrust and Competition Policy” for more details.
Slide #4
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

11. Agenda Items for the Week
May 2010
Agenda Items for the Week
Call for secretary
Set agenda for the week
Review from March
Review conference calls
Approve minutes from March
Review list of Complete and New Technique proposals and strawpolls
TG officer elections
Complete Proposal presentations
New Technique Proposals presentations
Strawpolls
Motions
Channel model
Confirmation vote
Editor election
Continue developing task group documents
Channel modeling
Planning for July
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

12. Submissions Recommendation for Next Steps in TGad, 10/580
April 2007
doc.: IEEE /0570r0
May 2010
Submissions
Recommendation for Next Steps in TGad, 10/580
Channel modeling
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

13. Selection Procedure May 2010 We are in Step 2/3:
NT and Complete Proposal presentations
On Wed PM2or PM3 we will be in Step 4:
Zero or more strawpoll votes may be held on Complete Proposals to gauge support.
Step 5 could take place on Th PM1:
A confirmation vote may be held if scheduled as a special order on the task group agenda.
If a Complete Proposal passes the confirmation vote with 75% approval then the technical specification provided for that Complete Proposal becomes the initial technical specification of IEEE ad and the selection procedure is completed.
If the confirmation vote fails to achieve 75% approval, or if no confirmation vote is held, continue to Step 6.
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

14. Tentative TGad Agenda for the Week (option 1)
April 2007
doc.: IEEE /0570r0
May 2010
Tentative TGad Agenda for the Week (option 1)
Monday May 17th, 19:30 – 21:30 (no overlap with TGac)
Call for secretary
Review from March
Review conference calls
Approve minutes from March
Review list of Complete and New Technique proposals and strawpolls
TG officer elections
Tuesday Mar 18th, 08:00 – 10:00 (no overlap with TGac)
Complete Proposals 1 and 3
Tuesday Mar 18th, 10:30 – 12:30 (no overlap with TGac)
Recommendation for Next Steps in TGad, 10/580
New Technique Proposals 1, 2, 3,
Tuesday May 18, 13:30-15:30 (no overlap with TGac)
New Technique Proposals 4 , 5, 6
Tuesday May 18, 16:00-18:00 (overlap with TGac)
New Technique Proposals 8, 9, 10
Tuesday May 18, 19:30-21:30 (overlap with TGac)
New Technique Proposals 11, 12, 13
Wednesday May 19, 08:00-10:00 (overlap with TGac)
Call for secretary
New Technique Proposals 14, 16, 17
Wednesday May 19, 13:30-15:30 (no overlap with TGac)
New Technique Proposals 19, 20, 21
Wednesday May 19, 16:00-18:00 (no overlap with TGac)
New Technique Proposals 22, 23, 24
Wednesday May 19, 19:30-21:30 (no overlap with TGac)
Complete proposal procedure motion
Special orders of the day of New Technique and Complete proposal strawpolls at 20:00
Thursday May 20th, 13:30 – 15:30 (no overlap with TGac)
Special orders of the day of confirmation vote at 13:40 (if necessary)
Continue developing Channel modeling document
Thursday May 20th, 16:00 – 18:00 (no overlap with TGac)
Special orders of the day of TGad editor election at 16:10 (if passing confirmation vote)
motion for Channel Model document
Planning for July
Goals for July
Conference calls
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

15. Tentative TGad Agenda for the Week (option 2)
April 2007
doc.: IEEE /0570r0
May 2010
Tentative TGad Agenda for the Week (option 2)
Monday May 17th, 19:30 – 21:30 (no overlap with TGac)
Call for secretary
Review from March
Review conference calls
Approve minutes from March
Review list of Complete and New Technique proposals and strawpolls
TG officer elections
Tuesday Mar 18th, 08:00 – 10:00 (no overlap with TGac)
Complete Proposals 1 and 3
Tuesday Mar 18th, 10:30 – 12:30 (no overlap with TGac)
Recommendation for Next Steps in TGad, 10/580
New Technique Proposals 1, 2, 3,
Tuesday May 18, 13:30-15:30 (no overlap with TGac)
New Technique Proposals 4 , 5, 6
Tuesday May 18, 16:00-18:00 (overlap with TGac)
New Technique Proposals 8, 9, 10
Tuesday May 18, 19:30-21:30 (overlap with TGac)
New Technique Proposals 11, 12, 13, 14
Wednesday May 19, 08:00-10:00 (overlap with TGac)
Call for secretary
New Technique Proposals 16, 17, 19, 20
Wednesday May 19, 13:30-15:30 (no overlap with TGac)
New Technique Proposals 21, 22, 23, 24
Wednesday May 19, 16:00-18:00 (no overlap with TGac)
Complete proposal procedure motion
Special orders of the day of New Technique and Complete proposal strawpolls at 16:30
Wednesday May 19, 19:30-21:30 (no overlap with TGac)
No meeting
Thursday May 20th, 13:30 – 15:30 (no overlap with TGac)
Special orders of the day of confirmation vote at 13:40 (if necessary)
Continue developing Channel modeling document
Thursday May 20th, 16:00 – 18:00 (no overlap with TGac)
Special orders of the day of TGad editor election at 16:10 (if passing confirmation vote)
motion for Channel Model document
Planning for July
Goals for July
Conference calls
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

16. Monday May 17th, 19:30 – 21:30 Call for secretary Review from March
April 2007
doc.: IEEE /0570r0
May 2010
Monday May 17th, 19:30 – 21:30
Call for secretary
Review from March
Review conference calls
Approve minutes from March
Review list of Complete and New Technique proposals and strawpolls
TG officer elections
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

17. Review from March (1/2) New Technique Proposals
May 2010
Review from March (1/2)
New Technique Proposals
802.11ad New Technique Proposal, 10/0259r2, Yuichi Morioka, Sony
Synchronous Collision Resolution - A New Technology Proposal, 10/0255r2, John Stine, Self
Channel Estimation Sequence for TGad, 10/0264r3, André Bourdoux, IMEC
Spatial Discovery in 60 GHz, 10/0245r1, Sudheer Grandhi, InterDigital
Efficient Methods for Coexistence with Other 60GHz Systems, 10/0231r3, John Barr, NICT
Basic TGad MAC Layer Proposals and Options for Coexistence, 10/0249r2, Xiaoming Peng, Insititute for Infocomm Research
Spatial Reuse Strategies in 60 GHz, 10/0250r1, Ananth Subramanian, Insititute for Infocomm Research
Strawpolls conducted on most of the New Technique proposals to gauge support (9 strawpolls in 22 minutes)
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

18. Review from March (2/2) Channel model document development
April 2007
doc.: IEEE /0570r0
May 2010
Review from March (2/2)
Channel model document development
Intra-cluster response model and parameter for the enterprise cubicle environments at 60GHz, 10/0372r0, Hirokazu Sawada
TGad Channel Model Update, 10/0391r0, Alexander Maltsev
Channel Models for 60 GHz WLAN Systems, 09/0334r7, Alexander Maltsev
Enterprise cubicle channel model discussed but not complete
Complete proposals in May will only simulate home living room and office conference room scenarios
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

19. May 2010
March Minutes
Motion to approve March ‘10 TGad minutes as contained in r1
Move:
Second:
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

20. Review of Conference Calls
May 2010
Review of Conference Calls
Cumulative minutes from 2010 in 10/0013r2
One call on April 29, :00 ET
11-10/0489r0, PHY Performance evaluation with 60GHz WLAN channel models, Alexander Maltsev
11-10/0490r0, Intra cluster response model and parameter for the enterprise cubicle environments at 60GHz, Hirokazu Sawada
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

21. Proposal presentations
May 2010
Proposal presentations
21 New Techniques proposals
2 Complete proposals
Time requirements
30 minutes allocation for new technique (inclusive of presentation, Q&A)
60 minutes allocation for complete (inclusive of presentation, Q&A)
Strawpolls on Wed after all complete and NT presentations
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

22. Complete Proposals (in order of presentation)
May 2010
Complete Proposals (in order of presentation)
CP 1
Presentation: Carlos Cordeiro, Intel, Gal Basson, Wilocity, 10/0432r1
Draft text: 10/0433r1
PAR, FRD and EVM declaration: 10/0434r0
Simulation Results and Methodology: 10/0435r0
PHY Simulations and Methodology: 10/0431r3
CP 2: withdrawn
CP 3
Presentation (including simulations, PAR, FRD and EVM declaration): Hiroshi Harada, NICT, 10/0498r3
Draft text: 10/0499r2
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

23. New Technique Proposals (in order of presentation) (1/2)
May 2010
New Technique Proposals (in order of presentation) (1/2)
Sync & Power Saving, Huai-Rong Shao, Samsung Electronics, 10/0446r0
Asymmetric Antenna Pattern Association, Tuncer Baykas, NICT, 10/0500r0
TGad Common Preamble, Hongyuan Zhang, Marvell, 10/0439r0
New MAC Features for TGad, Chao-Chun Wang, MediaTek, 10/0441r2
Beam training procedure for 60GHz mm-wave communication (TGad), Junyi Wang, NICT, 10/0496r1
Relay Operation in IEEE ad, Wooyong Lee, ETRI, 10/0494r1
Withdrawn
Fast Session Transfer, Laurent Cariou, Orange Labs / France Telecom R&D, 10/0491r1
Beamforming, Kishore Ramachandran, NEC, 10/0450r2
Fast Session Transfer, Naveen Kakani, Nokia, 10/0436r0
60-GHz RF System Performance Optimization, Tian-Wei Huang, National Taiwan University, 10/0497r0
TGad Security Enhancements, Yong Liu, Marvell, 10/0438r0
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

24. New Technique Proposals (in order of presentation) (2/2)
May 2010
New Technique Proposals (in order of presentation) (2/2)
Beamforming training for IEEE ad, Changsoon Choi, IHP microelectronics, 10/0493r0
Scheduled Spatial Reuse with Collaborative Beamforming, Thomas Derham, Orange Labs / France Telecom R&D, 10/0487r0
Withdrawn
MAC Link Maintenance, Haeyoung Jun, Samsung Electronics, 10/0445r0
Beamforming Introduction, Christopher Hansen, Broadcom, 10/0430r1
Collaboration between 2.4/5 and 60 GHz, Laurent Cariou, Orange Labs / France Telecom R&D, 10/0492r1
Single Carrier PHY, Murat Mese, Broadcom, 10/0429r1
Spatial Frequency Sharing and BSS Management, James Yee, MediaTek, 10/0443r0
OFDM PHY, Vish Ponnampalam, MediaTek, 10/0440r1
Mechanism for Inter-system Coexistence, Chin-Sean Sum, NICT, 10/0485r0
Spectrum Measurement for TGad, David Wong, Insititute for Infocomm Research, 10/0507r0
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

25. Standard Strawpoll Templates
May 2010
Standard Strawpoll Templates
“Do you support inclusion of the technique,
[list technique]
as described in 10/YYYYrZ in the TGad draft amendment?”
“Do you support adopting the complete proposal in 10/YYYYrZ as the first draft of the TGad amendment?”
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

26. NT Proposal Strawpolls (1/5)
May 2010
NT Proposal Strawpolls (1/5)
Sync & Power Saving, Huai-Rong Shao, Samsung Electronics, 10/0446
none
Asymmetric Antenna Pattern Association, Tuncer Baykas, NICT, 10/0500
Do you support inclusion of the technique,
    Asymmetric Antenna Pattern Association
as described in 10/500rX in the TGad draft amendment?
TGad Common Preamble, Hongyuan Zhang, Marvell, 10/0439
New MAC Features for TGad, Chao-Chun Wang, MediaTek, 10/0441
Beam training procedure for 60GHz mm-wave communication (TGad), Junyi Wang, NICT, 10/0496
Do you support inclusion of the technique,
beamforming
as described in 10/0496rX in the TGad draft amendment?
Relay Operation in IEEE ad, Wooyong Lee, ETRI, 10/0494
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

27. NT Proposal Strawpolls (2/5)
May 2010
NT Proposal Strawpolls (2/5)
Withdrawn
Fast Session Transfer, Laurent Cariou, Orange Labs / France Telecom R&D, 10/0491
Do you support inclusion of the technique,
Fast Session Transfer,
as described in 10/491rX in the TGad draft amendment?
Beamforming, Kishore Ramachandran, NEC, 10/0450
none
Fast Session Transfer, Naveen Kakani, Nokia, 10/0436
60-GHz RF System Performance Optimization, Tian-Wei Huang, National Taiwan University, 10/0497
TGad Security Enhancements, Yong Liu, Marvell, 10/0438
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

28. NT Proposal Strawpolls (3/5)
May 2010
NT Proposal Strawpolls (3/5)
Beamforming training for IEEE ad, Changsoon Choi, IHP microelectronics, 10/0493
Do you support inclusion of the technique,
beamforming training for IEEE ad
as described in 10/0493rX in the TGad draft amendment?
Scheduled Spatial Reuse with Collaborative Beamforming, Thomas Derham, Orange Labs / France Telecom R&D, 10/0487
Scheduled Spatial Reuse with Collaborative Beamforming
as described in 10/0487rX in the TGad draft amendment?
Withdrawn
MAC Link Maintenance, Haeyoung Jun, Samsung Electronics, 10/0445
none
Beamforming Introduction, Christopher Hansen, Broadcom, 10/0430
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

29. NT Proposal Strawpolls (4/5)
May 2010
NT Proposal Strawpolls (4/5)
Collaboration between 2.4/5 and 60 GHz, Laurent Cariou, Orange Labs / France Telecom R&D, 10/0492
Do you support inclusion of the technique,
Fast Session Transfer,
as described in 10/492rX in the TGad draft amendment?
2.4/5 GHz assisted 60 GHz,
2.4/5 assisted DLS of 60 GHz,
Single Carrier PHY, Murat Mese, Broadcom, 10/0429
none
Spatial Frequency Sharing and BSS Management, James Yee, MediaTek, 10/0443
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

30. NT Proposal Strawpolls (5/5)
May 2010
NT Proposal Strawpolls (5/5)
OFDM PHY, Vish Ponnampalam, MediaTek, 10/0440
none
Mechanism for Inter-system Coexistence, Chin-Sean Sum, NICT, 10/0485
Do you support inclusion of the technique,
coexistence technique Plan A,
as described in 10/0485rX in the TGad draft amendment?
coexistence technique Plan B,
Spectrum Measurement for TGad, David Wong, Insititute for Infocomm Research, 10/0507
Do you support inclusion of the technique,     Spectrum Measurement as described in 11-10/0507rX in the TGad draft amendment?
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

31. Complete Proposal Strawpolls
May 2010
Complete Proposal Strawpolls
CP 1
Do you support adopting the complete proposal in 10/0433rX as the first draft of the TGad amendment?”
CP 3
Do you support adopting the complete proposal in 10/0499rX as the first draft of the TGad amendment?”
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

32. TG Officer Elections Chair Vice Chair 1 (channel modeling, etc.)
May 2010
TG Officer Elections
Chair
Vice Chair 1 (channel modeling, etc.)
Vice Chair 2 (coexistence, etc.)
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

33. Notes for May 17th, 19:30 – 21:30 May 2010 April 2007
doc.: IEEE /0570r0
May 2010
Notes for May 17th, 19:30 – 21:30
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

34. May 2010
Backup
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

35. Goals for July May 2010 April 2007 doc.: IEEE 802.11-07/0570r0
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

36. Conference call times Not overlap with TGac June 24, July 1, 8
April 2007
doc.: IEEE /0570r0
May 2010
Conference call times
Not overlap with TGac
June 24, July 1, 8
10:00-12:00 ET
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

37. Motion for Confirmation Vote
May 2010
Motion for Confirmation Vote
Confirm <doc-ref> as the Initial Technical Specification Draft 0.1 for IEEE TGad [Pursuant to Step 5 of the TGad selection procedure,  as contained in 11-09/0935r5]
Move:
Second:
Yes:
No:
Abs:
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation

38. Motion for Channel Model Document
May 2010
Motion for Channel Model Document
Move to adopt 09/0334rYY as the TGad channel model document
Move:
Second:
Yes:
No:
Abs:
Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation