Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

AoD and AoA Estimation for TGac

Published byGloria Cook Modified over 5 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "AoD and AoA Estimation for TGac"— Presentation transcript:

1 AoD and AoA Estimation for TGac
Name Affiliations Address Phone Byung-Jae Kwak ETRI 138 Gajeongno, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, , Korea Myung Don Kim Jae Joon Park Wonsop Kim Minho Cheong Hyun Kyu Chung Gregory Breit Qualcomm 5775 Morehouse Dr., San Diego, CA Byung-Jae Kwak, ETRI, et al.

2 Contents Introduction Measurement campaign
How to generate 3D plots from measurement Measurement Site AoD and AoA estimation results Discussion Text proposal Byung-Jae Kwak, ETRI, et al.

3 Introduction TGac has been studying the AoD spectrum variation as a function of client location and orientation The TGac channel model addendum document still use “TBD” value for AoD range [1] This presentation describes the results of measurement performed at ETRI to show the AoD and AoA spectrum as a function of client location And proposes values for “TBD” [1] IEEE /0543r0, “Measured Channel Capacity and AoD Estimation for Multi-User MIMO Scenarios,” IEEE #115, May 2009. Byung-Jae Kwak, ETRI, et al.

4 Measurement Campaign New antenna systems
Circular array antenna systems Tx: 8 element circular array for 0o~360o AoD estimation Rx: 8 element circular array for 0o~360o AoA estimation 1 measurement site: 1st floor, Bldg. 7, ETRI 2 scenarios Tx at center Tx close to the wall 5 LOS & 5 NLOS client locations for each scenario Measured bandwidth: 100 MHz at 5.25 GHz Byung-Jae Kwak, ETRI, et al.

5 Phase Shift by AoD and AoA
Byung-Jae Kwak, ETRI, et al.

6 3D-plot Generation Received signal matrix for a single path =
with multi-path Byung-Jae Kwak, ETRI, et al.

7 Floor Map of the Measurement Site
7 4 1 6 8 9 Tx1 Rx 13m partition desks concrete wall Concrete pillar window steel wall wall steel 18m 15m 11m 8m Tx2 (LoS) (NLoS) 5 2 3 10 AP Client STA LoS NLoS Byung-Jae Kwak, ETRI, et al.

8 Tx & Rx Antenna Distances
Distance to client STAs from AP location 1 Tx1-Rx1 13.3m Tx1-Rx2 6.6m Tx1-Rx3 Tx1-Rx4 9.1m Tx1-Rx5 18.7m Tx1-Rx6 11.4m Tx1-Rx7 16.2m Tx1-Rx8 11.6m Tx1-Rx9 18.6m Tx1-Rx10 18.2m Distance to client STAs from AP location 2 Tx2-Rx1 17.3m Tx2-Rx2 14.3m Tx2-Rx3 13.2m Tx2-Rx4 10.6m Tx2-Rx5 11.6m Tx2-Rx6 7.2m Tx2-Rx7 5.2m Tx2-Rx8 5.4m Tx2-Rx9 8.9m Tx2-Rx10 10.7m Byung-Jae Kwak, ETRI, et al.

9 How to Read the 3D/Contour Plots
6 Tx1 partition desks concrete wall Concrete pillar window steel wall wall steel 15m 11m Byung-Jae Kwak, ETRI, et al.

10 AP Location 1: NLOS (1/4) Byung-Jae Kwak, ETRI, et al. Tx1 7 6 9
partition desks concrete wall Concrete pillar window steel wall wall steel 13m 18m 15m 11m 5 10 Byung-Jae Kwak, ETRI, et al.

11 AP Location 1: NLOS (2/4) Tx1, Rx5 Tx1, Rx6
Byung-Jae Kwak, ETRI, et al.

12 AP Location 1: NLOS (3/4) Tx1, Rx7 Tx1, Rx9
Byung-Jae Kwak, ETRI, et al.

13 AP Location 1: NLOS (4/4) Tx1, Rx10 Byung-Jae Kwak, ETRI, et al.

14 AP Location 1: LOS (1/4) Byung-Jae Kwak, ETRI, et al. Tx1 4 1 8 13m
partition desks concrete wall Concrete pillar window steel wall wall steel 15m 8m 2 3 Byung-Jae Kwak, ETRI, et al.

15 AP Location 1: LOS (2/4) Tx1, Rx1 Tx1, Rx2
Byung-Jae Kwak, ETRI, et al.

16 AP Location 1: LOS (3/4) Tx1, Rx3 Tx1, Rx4
Byung-Jae Kwak, ETRI, et al.

17 AP Location 1: LOS (4/4) Tx1, Rx8 Byung-Jae Kwak, ETRI, et al.

18 AP Location 2: NLOS (1/4) Byung-Jae Kwak, ETRI, et al. Tx2 window 2
7 4 1 partition desks concrete wall Concrete pillar window steel wall wall steel 18m Tx2 2 10 Byung-Jae Kwak, ETRI, et al.

19 AP Location 2: NLOS (2/4) Tx2, Rx1 Tx2, Rx2
Byung-Jae Kwak, ETRI, et al.

20 AP Location 2: NLOS (3/4) Tx2, Rx4 Tx2, Rx7
Byung-Jae Kwak, ETRI, et al.

21 AP Location 2: NLOS (4/4) Tx2, Rx10 Byung-Jae Kwak, ETRI, et al.

22 AP Location 2: LOS (1/4) Byung-Jae Kwak, ETRI, et al. Tx2 window 3
6 8 9 partition desks concrete wall Concrete pillar window steel wall wall steel Tx2 5 3 Byung-Jae Kwak, ETRI, et al.

23 AP Location 2: LOS (2/4) Tx2, Rx3 Tx2, Rx5
Byung-Jae Kwak, ETRI, et al.

24 AP Location 2: LOS (3/4) Tx2, Rx6 Tx2, Rx8
Byung-Jae Kwak, ETRI, et al.

25 AP Location 2: LOS (4/4) Tx2, Rx9 Byung-Jae Kwak, ETRI, et al.

26 Discussion In NLOS case, the AoD has uniform random distribution over 0o~360o. The above seems to be true even when the AP is located close to the wall. The results also supports TGac’s tentative conclusion made in May meeting that NLOS AoA, LOS AoA, and LOS AoD have uniform distribution over 0o~360o. Byung-Jae Kwak, ETRI, et al.

27 Text Proposal Modify subclause 4 of IEEE /0308r5, “TGac Channel Model Addendum,” IEEE #115, May 2009, as indicated below: ----- Begin Text Proposal ----- 4. Modifications to AoA and AoD for Multi-User MIMO TGac requires specification of channels to multiple users as simultaneous communication will take place to multiple STAs in technologies like multi-user MIMO. The TGn channel model document specifies the cluster AoAs and AoDs for point-to-point single user transmissions. Extensions of these AoDs and AoAs to the multi-user case are needed. Multi-user channels shall be modeled with the following modifications to the AoA and AoD for each client: Assume TGn-defined cluster AoDs and AoAs as baseline. For each client: Apply single random offset uniformly distributed over ±180° to the LOS tap AoA Apply single random offset uniformly distributed over ±180° to the LOS tap AoD Apply single random offset uniformly distributed over ±180° to the NLOS cluster AoAs Apply single random offset uniformly distributed over ±180° to the NLOS cluster AoDs ----- End Text Proposal ----- Byung-Jae Kwak, ETRI, et al.

28 References [1] IEEE /0543r0, “Measured Channel Capacity and AoD Estimation for Multi-User MIMO Scenarios,” IEEE #115, May 2009. [2] IEEE /0308r5, “TGac Channel Model Addendum,” IEEE #115, May 2009. Byung-Jae Kwak, ETRI, et al.

Download ppt "AoD and AoA Estimation for TGac"

Similar presentations

Doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0364r1 Submission March 11, 2009 JT Chen et al (Ralink Technology Corp.) Slide 1 Comments on AOA and AOD Selection for a Multi-User.

Doc.: IEEE /0364r1 Submission March 11, 2009 JT Chen et al (Ralink Technology Corp.) Slide 1 Comments on AOA and AOD Selection for a Multi-User.
July 2009 doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0823r0 Submission Progress Report for Corridor Channel Model for TGac Byung-Jae Kwak et al., ETRI Slide 1 NameAffiliationsAddressPhoneE-mail.

July 2009 doc.: IEEE /0823r0 Submission Progress Report for Corridor Channel Model for TGac Byung-Jae Kwak et al., ETRI Slide 1 NameAffiliationsAddressPhone .
Submission Greg Breit, Qualcomm, et al. TGac Channel Model Update May 2009 doc.:IEEE 802.11-09/0575r0 Slide 1 Greg Breit,

Submission Greg Breit, Qualcomm, et al. TGac Channel Model Update May 2009 doc.:IEEE /0575r0 Slide 1 Greg Breit,
Submission March 9, 2009 doc.:IEEE 802.11-09/0309r1 Slide 1 TGac Channel Model Addendum Highlights Greg Breit, Hemanth.

Submission March 9, 2009 doc.:IEEE /0309r1 Slide 1 TGac Channel Model Addendum Highlights Greg Breit, Hemanth.
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-09/0161r1 Submission doc.: IEEE 802.11-10/0087r0 January 2010 R. Kudo, K. Ishihara and Y. Takatori (NTT) Slide 1 Measured Channel Variation.

Doc.: IEEE /0161r1 Submission doc.: IEEE /0087r0 January 2010 R. Kudo, K. Ishihara and Y. Takatori (NTT) Slide 1 Measured Channel Variation.
Submission Byung-Jae Kwak et al., ETRISlide 1 May 2009 doc.:IEEE 802.11-09/0543r0 Measured Channel Capacity and AoD Estimation for Multi-User MIMO Scenarios.

Submission Byung-Jae Kwak et al., ETRISlide 1 May 2009 doc.:IEEE /0543r0 Measured Channel Capacity and AoD Estimation for Multi-User MIMO Scenarios.
Interdigital Communications Submission doc.: IEEE 802.11-15/1333r1 November 2015 Feasibility of SU-MIMO under Array Alignment Method Date: 2015-11-09 Slide.

Interdigital Communications Submission doc.: IEEE /1333r1 November 2015 Feasibility of SU-MIMO under Array Alignment Method Date: Slide.
Submission Greg Breit, Qualcomm, et al. June 2009 doc.:IEEE 802.11-09/0699r0 Slide 1 Multi-User AoD Diversity Measurements Date: 2009-06-24 Authors:

Submission Greg Breit, Qualcomm, et al. June 2009 doc.:IEEE /0699r0 Slide 1 Multi-User AoD Diversity Measurements Date: Authors:
InterDigital, Inc. Submission doc.: IEEE 802.11-16/0911r1 July 2016 Link Level Performance Comparisons of Open Loop, Closed Loop and Antenna Selection.

InterDigital, Inc. Submission doc.: IEEE /0911r1 July 2016 Link Level Performance Comparisons of Open Loop, Closed Loop and Antenna Selection.
Doc.: IEEE 802.11-16/1209r0 Submission Hotel lobby SU-MIMO channel modeling: 2x2 golden set generation Date: 2016-09-13 September 2016 Alexander Maltsev,

Doc.: IEEE /1209r0 Submission Hotel lobby SU-MIMO channel modeling: 2x2 golden set generation Date: September 2016 Alexander Maltsev,
doc.: IEEE <doc#>

doc.: IEEE <doc#>
TGac Channel Model Update

TGac Channel Model Update
Closed Loop SU-MIMO Performance with Quantized Feedback

Closed Loop SU-MIMO Performance with Quantized Feedback
Open Loop vs Closed Loop SU-MIMO for 11ay

Open Loop vs Closed Loop SU-MIMO for 11ay
PHY Abstraction for MU-MIMO in TGac

PHY Abstraction for MU-MIMO in TGac
On the Channel Model for Short Range Communications

On the Channel Model for Short Range Communications
<month year> doc.: IEEE a Nov 2005

<month year> doc.: IEEE a Nov 2005
Considerations on HEW Evaluation Methodology

Considerations on HEW Evaluation Methodology
Requirements Discussion

Requirements Discussion
Indoor Propagation Modeling

Indoor Propagation Modeling

Similar presentations

Ads by Google