Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

PHYSICIANS FOR A NATIONAL HEALTH PROGRAM

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "PHYSICIANS FOR A NATIONAL HEALTH PROGRAM"— Presentation transcript:

1 PHYSICIANS FOR A NATIONAL HEALTH PROGRAM
29 EAST MADISON SUITE 602 CHICAGO, IL TEL: (312)

2 The Uninsured

3

4

5

6

7 Financial Suffering Among the INSURED

8

9

10 Persistent Racial Inequalities

11

12

13

14 Rationing Amidst a Surplus of Care

15 Some Regions Already Spend at Canadian Level
Variation in Medicare Spending: Some Regions Already Spend at Canadian Level

16

17 Half of Americans Live Where Population Is Too Low for Competition
A town’s only hospital will not compete with itself Source: NEJM 1993;328:148

18 Profit-Driven HMOs: A Problem, Not a Solution

19

20

21

22

23 Medicare HMOs: A Cautionary Tale About Competition Between Public and Private Plans (AKA Public Plan Option)

24

25 Despite Medicare’s Lower Overhead, Enrollment of Medicare Patients in Private Plans Has Grown

26

27 Private Medicare Plans Have Prospered by Cherry Picking

28

29

30

31

32

33 Investor-Owned Care: Inflated Costs, Inferior Quality

34 For-Profit Hospitals’ Death Rates are 2% Higher
Source: CMAJ 2002;166:1399

35 For-Profit Hospitals Cost 19% More
Source: CMAJ 2004;170:1817

36 For-Profit Dialysis Clinics’ Death Rates are 9% Higher
Source: JAMA 2002;288:2449

37

38 High Deductible Insurance: Except for the Healthy and Wealthy, It’s Unwise

39

40

41

42

43 Mandate Model Reform: Keeping Private Insurers In Charge

44 “Mandate” Model for Reform
Proposed by Richard Nixon in 1971 to block Edward Kennedy’s NHI proposal

45 “Mandate” Model for Reform
Government uses its coercive power to make people buy private insurance.

46 “Mandate” Model for Reform
Expanded Medicaid-like program Free for poor Subsidies for low income Buy-in without subsidy for others Employer Mandate +/- Individuals Managed Care / Care Management

47 “Mandate” Model - Problems
Absent cost controls, expanded coverage unaffordable Computers, care management, prevention not shown to cut costs Adds administrative complexity and cost; retains wasteful private insurers Impeccable political logic, economic nonsense

48 The Massachusetts Reform: Headed Towards Failure

49 Massachusetts: Required Coverage (Income > $31k)
Premium: $4,800 Annually (56 year old) $2000 deductible 20% co-insurance AFTER deductible is reached

50 Crimes and Punishments in Massachusetts
The Crime The Fine Violation of Child Labor Laws $50 Employers Failing to Partially Subsidize a Poor Health Plan for Workers $295 Illegal Sale of Firearms, First Offense $500 max. Driving Under the Influence, First Offense $500 min. Domestic Assault $1000 max. Cruelty to or Malicious Killing of Animals Communication of a Terrorist Threat $1000 min. Being Uninsured In Massachusetts $1068

51 How Many are Uninsured in Massachusetts?
State and Blue Cross Surveys – 2.6% Phone survey, few non-english speakers Census Bureau – 5.5% Door-to-door survey, all local languages Mass. Department of Revenue – 5% of taxpayers, as of 1/1/2008 – based on tax returns

52

53

54

55

56 Tried and Failed: State Experiments with Mandate Model and Other Incremental Reforms

57 Massachusetts 2006 “Every uninsured citizen in Massachusetts will soon have affordable health insurance and the costs of health care will be reduced. Gov. Romney.” “The bill does what health experts say no other state has been able to do: provide a mechanism for all of its citizens to obtain health insurance.” Sources: Wall Street Journal 4/11/06 and New York Times 4/5/06.

58 Massachusetts 1988 “I am very proud of the fact that Massachusetts will be the first state in the country to enact universal health insurance.” Gov. Dukakis` “Massachusetts last week ventured where no state has gone before: it guaranteed health insurance for every resident.” Sources: New York Times 4/14/88 and 4/26/88

59

60 Oregon 1992 “Today our dreams of providing effective and affordable health care to all Oregonians has come true.” Gov. Roberts “The most far-reaching health care reform in the nation.” Sources:Washington Post 6/9/92 and 3/20/`93

61

62 Tennessee 1992 “The most radical health care plan in America.” “Tennessee will cover at least 95% of its citizens with health insurance by the end of 1994.” Gov. Ned McWherter Sources: Federal & State Insurance Week 4/12/93; and NY Times 9/16/94

63

64 Vermont 1992 “This is an incredibly exciting moment that should make all Vermonters proud.” Gov. Dean “Governor Howard Dean, the only governor who is a doctor, signed a law here today that sets in motion a plan to give Vermont universal healthcare by 1995.” Source: New York Times 4/12/92

65

66 Minnesota 1992/1993 “Minnesota is enacting a program that will be the most sweeping effort yet to provide health insurance to people who lack it the first complete reform proposal in the U.S.” “Minnesota is about to embark on a plan to solve the health-insurance crisis that could hold lessons for other states and the nation.” Sources: New York Times 4/19/92; and Richard Reece, Medical World News 7/1/92.

67

68 Washington 1993 Washington state “passed one of the most aggressive health care experiments in the nation, a program that would extend medical benefits to all 5.1 million residents of the state ” Source: New York Times 5/2/93

69

70 Maine 2003 “It’s bold and comprehensive, and it’s now the law of the state.” Gov. Baldacci “Maine has just become the first state in the union to approve a plan to provide universal access to affordable health insurance.” Sources: AP Newswire 4/25/06 and Ellen Goodman, Washington Post Writers Group 7/7/03.

71

72 Public Plan Option: The Next Disappointment

73 In 1962 Republicans Jacob Javits and John Lindsay proposed a Public Plan Option (H.R and S. 2664) as an alternative to a public Medicare plan

74 Public Plan Option Saves Little Even if Half of Privately-Insured Switch
No savings on hospitals’ billing or internal cost tracking Hospitals already use computerized uniform bill (UB-82) Global budgeting could save $90 bil. annually No savings on NH/home care bureaucracy ($24 bil. saved with single payer) No savings on MD office bureaucracy Single payer would save $85 bil. annually through simple, uniform fee schedule, eliminating prior-approval etc. Insurance overhead reduced $38 bil. v $131 bil. under single payer Private insurers retain significant market share Hospital/NH payment can’t be simplified without global budgets Need to collect premiums, track enrollment disenrollment etc.

75 Public Plan Option Cannot Solve Cost Problems
Achieves only a fraction (1/7th) of administrative savings possible through single payer – makes expanded coverage unaffordable Medicare HMO experience shows private plans undermine fair competition despite regulations – avoid expensively ill Public plan effectively serves as subsidy for private insurers, taking on many high cost patients and few profitable ones

76 The U.S. Trails Other Nations

77

78

79

80

81

82

83

84 Canada’s National Health Insurance Program

85

86

87

88

89

90

91

92

93

94

95

96 A National Health Program for the U.S.

97

98

99

100

101 Public Opinion Favors Single Payer National Health Insurance

102

103


Download ppt "PHYSICIANS FOR A NATIONAL HEALTH PROGRAM"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google