Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Component Resolved Diagnostics

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Component Resolved Diagnostics"— Presentation transcript:

1 Component Resolved Diagnostics
Roisin Fitzsimons Consultant Nurse Guy’s and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust

2 Overview of session Current diagnostic methods What is component resolved diagnostics (CRD)? Application to practice

3 Allergy Diagnosis History Skin Prick Testing (SPT) Specific IgE Testing (SpIgE) Provocation - Oral food challenge

4 What is CRD?

5 Protein Formation

6 Major peanut allergens
Peanut components Ara h 2 Ara h 1 Ara h 8 Ara h 9 Ara h 3 Major peanut allergens

7 Features of peanut components
Seed storage proteins PR10 proteins Lipid Transfer Proteins (LTP) Ara h 1,2,3 - major peanut allergens Ara h 8 Ara h 9 Responsible for primary sensitisation Recognition of similar structures Found in nuts, seeds, legumes Bet v 1 homologue (Apple Mal d 1) Heat resistant and stable May cause systemic, severe reactions Altered by heating/gastric juices Risk of severe reactions Not easily broken down Localised symptoms Cross-reactivity with Pru p 3 Present in large quantities Pollen food syndrome Common in Southern European countries Can we predict severity of allergy? Formed of components Structure and significance varies

8 Relevance to practice Can we predict severity of a reaction? Ara h 1,2,3 – primary sensitisation to peanut Ara h 8 – cross reactivity with Birch pollen

9 Case study - Rose 8 year old Sesame allergic Allergic Rhinitis FH peanut allergy Always avoided peanuts Immunological investigations SPT 2mm SpIgE 4.38ku/ml Ara h 1 – 0.00 Ara h 2 – 0.16 Ara h 3 – 0.00 Ara h 8 – 6.24

10 What next? Allergic; avoid peanuts? Tolerant; introduce peanuts?
Probably OAS; introduce peanuts with caution? Not sure; OFC?

11 Proceeded to OFC Tolerated first two doses Third dose – oral pruritus, no objective symptoms Repeated dose – worsening of pruritus, not distractible What next?

12 Implications for practice
Ara h 2 clinically relevant for predicting positive OFC Presence of Ara h 1&3 increases likelihood of allergy Ara h 8 may suggest OAS Listen to your patient and family

13 Summary CRD useful in aiding diagnosis Should not replace clinical history and holistic evaluation Easier to predict allergy than tolerance

14 Reference list Beyer K et al 2015, Allergy; 70: 90–98. Dang T D et al, 2012, J Allergy Clin Immunol;129: Nicolaou N et al, 2010, J Allergy Clin Immunol; 125:191-7 Asarnoj A and Movérare R et al, 2010, Allergy


Download ppt "Component Resolved Diagnostics"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google