1. XMCPDT Does Have Correct Type I Error Rates
Jie Ding, Shili Lin 
The American Journal of Human Genetics 
Volume 82, Issue 2, Pages (February 2008)
DOI: /j.ajhg
Copyright © 2008 The American Society of Human Genetics Terms and Conditions

2. Figure 1
Comparisons of Type I Error Rates and Powers between X-APL and XMCPDT
(A and B) Type I error and power, respectively, for the setting with three-children families with at least one affected.
(C and D) Type I error and power, respectively, for the setting with OSUMS family structures.
The horizontal dashed line in (A) and (C) marks the nominal level of type I error rate. A total of 12 models were considered: recessive models RA–RF and multiplicative models MA–MF.1 XMCPDTT and XMCPDTE are XMCPDT with true or estimated allele frequencies.
The American Journal of Human Genetics  , DOI: ( /j.ajhg )
Copyright © 2008 The American Society of Human Genetics Terms and Conditions