Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Hall C Users Meeting 31 January 2009

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Hall C Users Meeting 31 January 2009"— Presentation transcript:

1 Hall C Users Meeting 31 January 2009
SHMS Optics Update Tanja Horn Hall C Users Meeting 31 January 2009

2 SHMS Optics Configuration
Need charged particle detection with momenta up to the beam energy (11 GeV) at forward angles down to 5.5° even with HMS at small angles Most reasonable configuration: HBQQQD Focal Plane HB Q1 Q2 Q3 DIPOLE Deflection=3 ° Deflection= 18.4 °

3 Collimator reduces uncertainties due to optics
Q1 Q2 Q3 D +10% < δ < +15% Event loss at Q1 due to geometric effects Acceptance at dipole entrance depends on aperture and δ Events at negative δ are focused more Collimator can eliminate events that would be lost inside the dipole Reduces model dependent systematic uncertainty

4 Sieve Slit for Spectrometer Optics
Sieve slit is used to understand the optics properties the spectrometer Figures show HMS sieve slit reconstruction data HMS X’ (individual holes) 1.8 mr X’ (columns) mr Y’ (individual holes) mr Y’ (rows) mr Y (mean) 2 mm H. Blok, T. Horn, G. Huber et al., Phys. Rev. C78 (2008)

5 HMS collimator/slit system
Sieve slit 0.508 cm holes in 7 (9) columns at cm (2.540 cm) intervals in the horizontal (vertical) direction Center of sieve slit at 168 cm from target center No holes at / cm and cm/-5.080cm for orientation checks Outermost holes are at ± cm (±60.5 mr) Octagonal collimators 6.35 cm thick heavymet (90% W, 10% CuNi) HMS Collimator box D Q1 Q2 Q3

6 SHMS collimator/sieve system
Sieve collimator in front of HB: standard optics calibration may be complicated Aperture defining slits: best location in front of HB Sieve collimator in front of Q1: optics modeling straightforward, but have to assume that perturbations due to HB are small Possible sieve collimator locations y HB Q1 Q2 Q3 D x Design will be octagonal shape Dimensions depend on location in z

7 Place SHMS collimator after HB
Q1 SHMS collimator box No room before HB for collimator box with collimator(s) and sieve slit Assume front of collimator is at 82 cm after the HB center or at 2.58 m from the pivot Collimator is then ±0.055*258=±14.2 cm high and ±0.030*258=±7.7 cm wide Assume heavymet material for ±5cm at least need 40cm by 25cm per collimator

8 Slit Box Design Limitations: Width
SHMS HMS Q1 HB Q2 Slit box Guiding rod options: 35-cm wide slit box is possible Move horizontally from SHMS left to beam axis Mechanical (surveyed) stop at SHMS right Guiding rods (w/ tooling balls) on top and bottom Two options: guiding rods in the back or to sides

9 Slit Box Design Limitations: Depth
Analogous to HMS design, assume octagonal collimator thickness 6.4 cm Sieve slit is thinner (e.g., HMS: cm thick) Two octagonal collimators Also take into account additional material for support etc. Type Thickness Box material thickness 0.9 cm Empty space for motion 0.6 cm Collimator thickness 6.4 cm Rod/tooling ball space 4.6 cm Box/material thickness Total depth of slit box 13.4 cm Sieve slit

10 SHMS Slit Box in Hall C Slit box fits between HB and Q1
Front of slit box is 80 cm after the HB center, or at 2.56 m from target center Sufficiently far away from HB to have minimum stray field

11 SHMS sieve slit design Standard calibrations of SHMS with the sieve before Q1 possible Preliminary simulations show small distortions of mid-plane symmetry FP pattern of sieve before HB shows strong delta dependence of the bending z=120cm z=258cm Size of sieve holes: 3 mrad For comparison: HMS sieve holes diameter is 0.504cm (3 mrad) Further studies of the focal plane patterns will determine the optimal design for optics reconstruction

12 Additional Sieve Slit before HB
Special calibration sieve slit HB Q1 120 cm from target center Assume front of sieve slit is 56 cm in front of HB center or at 1.20 m from the pivot Need to cover at least ±0.055*120cm=±6.6 cm high and ±0.030*120cm=±3.6cm wide for a point target Assume heavymet material for ± 5 cm at least at the edges Assume 30 cm wide by 25 cm high sieve (note: HB gap is 35cm by 36 cm) Weighs about 40 kg, so movable by hand

13 Design Limitation: height of the sieve slit
SHMS HMS Q1 HB Q2 Special Sieve Slit Type Thickness Wall thickness 0.9 cm (x2) Rod/tooling ball thickness 4.6 cm (x2) Sieve slit height 25.0 cm Total height of slit box 36.0 cm Additional sieve slit (simple hand motion) before HB Move horizontally from SHMS left to beam axis Only inserted for special calibration runs

14 Design Limitation: depth of the sieve slit
Analogous to HMS design, assume octagonal sieve slit thickness 3.2 cm But cannot forget about additional materials for support Type Thickness Thickness of guide before sieve 0.5 cm Sieve slit thickness (but rod/tooling bar thickness) 3.2 cm 5.1 cm Thickness of guide after sieve Back wall material thickness 0.9 cm Total depth of slit box 6.5 cm

15 Next Steps Additional studies for understanding the optical properties of the SHMS including HB Look how HB distorts the “image” of a collimator or sieve slit in front of it. How does an entrance octogonal look like in position and angle space at the planned location at the entrance of Q1 – can easily be done using HB TOSCA HMS Q2 Q1’ Beamline Bender Short report on simulation results Optimization of the distance between and the size of the Q1 sieve holes and the special calibration sieve slit before HB HMS Q1 Additional techniques for calibration techniques Possibilities of H(e,e’p) for calibrations especially the HB part Target

16 Backup material

17 Q1 sieve

18 Special calibration sieve

19 Target Region Slot in Q2 for Beamline Slot in Q1’ for Beamline
Vertical Slot in HB for HMS Q1 at 12° Slot in HB for Beamline


Download ppt "Hall C Users Meeting 31 January 2009"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google