Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Reframing Leaving Care as Family Support: Implications for Practice

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Reframing Leaving Care as Family Support: Implications for Practice"— Presentation transcript:

1 Reframing Leaving Care as Family Support: Implications for Practice
Prof John Pinkerton School of Social Work Queens University Belfast

2 Aim of presentation Five steps in reframing The problem of Silos
The Green Cheese dilemma The central role of the workers

3 Five steps in the process of reframing
Describe basic characteristics of existing work Locate within a view of wider child welfare system, Evaluate consistency with family support criteria, Plan to strengthen alignment with family support criteria Act to implement family support

4 Conceptual aids to reframing
Whole systems Aspects of provision Levels of support Care careers Service delivery criteria Methods

5 Whole System – split view

6 Whole System - integrated view

7 Step 1: Describing the work
Target Client Group Who is the central target service user group for my work ? parents, toddlers, teenagers, children with a disability Major Activities What activities am I primarily involved in delivering or managing ? home visits, play school, youth group, parenting course, counselling sessions, family therapy, residential care Skills & Methods What skills and methods am I using ? information giving, empathy, advocacy, counselling, group work, community development Work Force Who is it that I work with as colleagues ? social worker, psychologist, family centre worker, community mother, youth and community worker Purpose What is the purpose of my work ? community development, child protection, alternative care social inclusion of marginalised youth, \promotion of child development,

8 Step 2 Locating the work in the Four Levels of Support for Families
Level One: open access support Level Two: targeted support Level Three: targeted intervention Level Four: out of home care managed reintegration community play group family centre respite care family and child care team placement aftercare team preparation for leaving (adapted from Hardiker et al 1991)

9 Phases in a care career Dependence Inter- dependence
Pre Care After Care Care Placement Foster Care Home in Care Residential Care Preparation for Leaving Care Dependence Inter- dependence In-Care Position ? Need ? Support ?

10 Care Career and Levels of Support
Level One: Pre-Care After-Care Level Two: Pre-Care After-Care Level Three: Level Four: In-Care Leaving Care Preparation for leaving

11 Step 3: Evaluating Service Delivery
CRITERIA DESCRIPTORS Criterion 1 planned, managed, flexible process Criterion 2 explicit methods, techniques and skills Criterion 3 draws on expertise of other service providers Criterion 4 draws on the contribution of relatives, friends, neighbours Pinkerton et al 2000 Family Support – Linking Project Evaluation to Policy Analysis Aldershot:Ashgate

12 Step 3: Evaluation criteria (cont)
Criterion 5 responsive to children/young people and parents/carers opinions, wishes and feelings Criterion 6 understanding and respect of race and culture Criterion 7 incorporates child protection Criterion 8 minimises effect of disabilities

13 Step 3: Meeting the criteria on Check List 2 ?
ACHIEVED YES / NO Criterion 1 process YES Criterion 2 methods, NO Criterion 3 other services Criterion 4 informal networks

14 Step 3: Meeting the criteria ? (cont)
Criterion 5 responsive YES Criterion 6 race and culture NO Criterion 7 child protection Criterion 8 disabilities

15 PLANNED STRENGHTHENING
Step 4: Planning to strengthen the allignment of practice to criteria CRITERIA ACHIEVED YES / NO PLANNED STRENGHTHENING Criterion 1 process YES Closer attention to opportunities within agency policy and procedure Criterion 2 methods, NO Develop and run group work programme Criterion 3 other services Involve other agencies in developing, running and contributing to the programme Criterion 4 informal networks Involve members of the young people’s informal networks in contributing to the programme

16 Planned strengthening (cont)
Criterion 5 responsive YES Involve young people and their families in planning the programme Criterion 6 race and culture NO Criterion 7 child protection Include risk as an underlying theme for the programme Criterion 8 disabilities Identify those young people with special needs and plan accordingly

17 I think …. shared approach to family support practice
integrated four level service system clear family support practice criteria five step reframing

18 I am sure … the answers lie in what the front line worker does


Download ppt "Reframing Leaving Care as Family Support: Implications for Practice"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google