Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

IEEE P802.11af Teleconference

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "IEEE P802.11af Teleconference"— Presentation transcript:

1 IEEE P802.11af Teleconference
April 2009 doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0 February 2010 IEEE P802.11af Teleconference Date: Authors: Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

2 April 2009 doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0 February 2010 Abstract This presentation is the agenda and meeting plan for the March 30th 2010 IEEE TGaf teleconference. Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

3 Agenda Introduction Administrative items
February 2010 Agenda Introduction Administrative items Review of PAR Scope and TG approved Purpose, Principles and Vision/Outcome Review the results from Orlando Discuss draft text from the approved proposals Plan for next teleconferences Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

4 February 2010 Introduction Welcome to the IEEE P802.11af March 30, 2010 teleconference Chairs and secretary Chair: Rich Kennedy (Research In Motion) Vice-chair and Webex Facilitator: Peter Ecclesine (Cisco) Recording Secretary: Zhou Lan (NICT) Recording your attendance Send to: and Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

5 February 2010 Administrative Items Please be familiar with the documents at the following links: IEEE Patent Policy - Patent FAQ - LoA Form - Affiliation FAQ - Anti-Trust FAQ - Ethics - IEEE Working Group Policies and Procedures - Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

6 Participants, Patents, and Duty to Inform
February 2010 All participants in this meeting have certain obligations under the IEEE-SA Patent Policy. Participants: “Shall inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed)” of the identity of each “holder of any potential Essential Patent Claims of which they are personally aware” if the claims are owned or controlled by the participant or the entity the participant is from, employed by, or otherwise represents “Personal awareness” means that the participant “is personally aware that the holder may have a potential Essential Patent Claim,” even if the participant is not personally aware of the specific patents or patent claims “Should inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed)” of the identity of “any other holders of such potential Essential Patent Claims” (that is, third parties that are not affiliated with the participant, with the participant’s employer, or with anyone else that the participant is from or otherwise represents) The above does not apply if the patent claim is already the subject of an Accepted Letter of Assurance that applies to the proposed standard(s) under consideration by this group Quoted text excerpted from IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws subclause 6.2 Early identification of holders of potential Essential Patent Claims is strongly encouraged No duty to perform a patent search Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

7 Patent Related Links February 2010 All participants should be familiar with their obligations under the IEEE-SA Policies & Procedures for standards development. Patent Policy is stated in these sources: IEEE-SA Standards Boards Bylaws IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual Material about the patent policy is available at If you have questions, contact the IEEE-SA Standards Board Patent Committee Administrator at or visit This slide set is available at Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

8 Call for Potentially Essential Patents
February 2010 If anyone in this meeting is personally aware of the holder of any patent claims that are potentially essential to implementation of the proposed standard(s) under consideration by this group and that are not already the subject of an Accepted Letter of Assurance: Either speak up now or Provide the chair of this group with the identity of the holder(s) of any and all such claims as soon as possible or Cause an LOA to be submitted Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

9 Other Guidelines for IEEE WG Meetings
February 2010 All IEEE-SA standards meetings shall be conducted in compliance with all applicable laws, including antitrust and competition laws. Don’t discuss the interpretation, validity, or essentiality of patents/patent claims. Don’t discuss specific license rates, terms, or conditions. Relative costs, including licensing costs of essential patent claims, of different technical approaches may be discussed in standards development meetings. Technical considerations remain primary focus Don’t discuss or engage in the fixing of product prices, allocation of customers, or division of sales markets. Don’t discuss the status or substance of ongoing or threatened litigation. Don’t be silent if inappropriate topics are discussed … do formally object. See IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual, clause and “Promoting Competition and Innovation: What You Need to Know about the IEEE Standards Association's Antitrust and Competition Policy” for more details. Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

10 February 2010 PAR Scope and Purpose PAR Scope: An amendment that defines modifications to both the physical layers (PHY) and the Medium Access Control Layer (MAC), to meet the legal requirements for channel access and coexistence in the TV White Space PAR Purpose: The purpose of this amendment is to allow wireless networks to be used in the TV white space Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

11 February 2010 Purpose, Principles and Vision/Outcome If you don't know where you are going, you might wind up someplace else.* cbp-and-david-allens-methods Purpose: the Task Group should create an amendment whose implementation in solutions is likely to receive FCC approval for operation in the TV White Spaces under the 47 CFR Part 15 subpart H rules. Principles: If the FCC changes the rules, the Task Group should change the amendment accordingly The amendment should not duplicate functionality that is being standardized in other Task Groups that are likely to complete before af. There is no need for backwards compatibility with 2.45 GHz ISM operation. The starting point is changes to Clauses 17 and 20 and Annexes I and J Vision/Outcome: Use the OFDM PHYs with 5-, 10- and 20-MHz channel widths to specify the basis for a system that the regulators can approve for operation in the TVWS bands. * Yogi Berra Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

12 Review of the Orlando Meeting
February 2010 Review of the Orlando Meeting Ten proposals were discussed Document 11-10/238r2 was adopted as Draft 0.01 Nine other proposals categorized and discussed PHY+MAC, PHY, MAC, Other Straw polls passed 4 of the 9 to further consideration Authors of the 4 encouraged to write normative and or informative text to roll into d0.01 Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

13 The Proposals February 2010
af-petere-amendment-proposal - [adopted as D0.01] af-amendment-proposal-for-measurement-report af-modification-on-dfs-and-dcf-procedure-adapting-to-fcc-rules-in-tvws-part-2-hidden-node af-modification-on-dfs-and-dcf-procedure-adapting-to-fcc-rules-in-tvws-part-1-synchronized-quiet af-regulatory-operating-classes-specifications af-mac-and-phy-proposal-for af af-radio-resource-measurement-type-and-procedure-for-tvws-application-under-fcc-rules af-enabling-procedure-of-communication-in-tvws-under-fcc-rules af-requirements-and-amendments-regarding-tvws-database-access af-amendment-proposal-for-tv-white-spaces-operation Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

14 11-10/0257r1 Title: Regulatory/Operating Classes Specifications
February 2010 11-10/0257r1 Title: Regulatory/Operating Classes Specifications Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

15 February 2010 11-10/0260r2 Title: Radio Resource Measurement Type and Procedure for TVWS application under FCC rules Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

16 February 2010 11-10/0261r1 Title: Enabling Procedure of Communication in TVWS under FCC rules Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

17 11-10/0263r1 Title: Amendment Proposal for TV White Spaces Operation
February 2010 11-10/0263r1 Title: Amendment Proposal for TV White Spaces Operation Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

18 Plan for the April 13th Teleconference
February 2010 Plan for the April 13th Teleconference Complete the accepted proposal review Any further discussion on failed proposals Plan for May meeting in Beijing Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

19 References February 2010 11-09-0749-03-0000-802.11-in-the-tvws
IEEE Std IEEE Standard for Information Technology— Telecommunications and information exchange between systems— Local and metropolitan area networks— Specific requirements Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications FCC Second Report and Order and Memorandum and Order ( tvws-par-nescom-form-plus-5c cbp-and-david-allens-methods af-meeting-plan-and-agenda-los-angeles-2010 af-draft-call-for-proposals af-feb teleconferenc-plan af-feb-16-telecon-minutes af-petere-amendment-proposal af-amendment-proposal-for-measurement-report Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

20 References [2] February 2010
af-modification-on-dfs-and-dcf-procedure-adapting-to-fcc-rules-in-tvws-part-2-hidden-node af-modification-on-dfs-and-dcf-procedure-adapting-to-fcc-rules-in-tvws-part-1-synchronized-quiet af-regulatory-operating-classes-specifications af-mac-and-phy-proposal-for af af-radio-resource-measurement-type-and-procedure-for-tvws-application-under-fcc-rules af-enabling-procedure-of-communication-in-tvws-under-fcc-rules af-requirements-and-amendments-regarding-tvws-database-access af-amendment-proposal-for-tv-white-spaces-operation af-mar teleconferenc-plan af-summary-of-nict-fs-technical-proposals-for-tgaf af-march-9-teleconference-minutes Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

21 References [3] February 2010
af-meeting-plan-and-agenda-orlando-2010 af-closing-report-orlando-2010 af-meeting-minutes-for-Orlando-2010 Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion


Download ppt "IEEE P802.11af Teleconference"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google