1. Informatics 122 Software Design II
Lecture 10
André van der Hoek & Alex Baker
Duplication of course material for any commercial purpose without the explicit written permission of the professor is prohibited.
February 24, 2019 – 17:35:35
(c) 2007 University of California, Irvine – André van der Hoek

2. © 2007 University of California, Irvine – André van der Hoek
Today’s Lecture
Design patterns retrospective
Assignment 5
February 24, 2019 – 17:35:35
© 2007 University of California, Irvine – André van der Hoek

3. © 2007 University of California, Irvine – André van der Hoek
What Was Your Process?
February 24, 2019 – 17:35:35
© 2007 University of California, Irvine – André van der Hoek

4. How Did You Examine The Code?
February 24, 2019 – 17:35:35
© 2007 University of California, Irvine – André van der Hoek

5. Which Design Patterns Did You Examine?
February 24, 2019 – 17:35:35
© 2007 University of California, Irvine – André van der Hoek

6. How Did You Judge Suitability?
February 24, 2019 – 17:35:35
© 2007 University of California, Irvine – André van der Hoek

7. How Was It Finding Non-Discussed Patterns?
February 24, 2019 – 17:35:35
© 2007 University of California, Irvine – André van der Hoek

8. © 2007 University of California, Irvine – André van der Hoek
Did The Code Improve?
February 24, 2019 – 17:35:35
© 2007 University of California, Irvine – André van der Hoek

9. What Do You Think of Design Patterns Now?
February 24, 2019 – 17:35:35
© 2007 University of California, Irvine – André van der Hoek

10. What About Using Them While Programming?
February 24, 2019 – 17:35:35
© 2007 University of California, Irvine – André van der Hoek

11. Design Patterns: Easy or Difficult?
February 24, 2019 – 17:35:35
© 2007 University of California, Irvine – André van der Hoek

12. © 2007 University of California, Irvine – André van der Hoek
Assignment 5
Research available components that provide a particular kind of functionality for VBoard, set up selection criteria, make a choice of the component that you believe is best, and detail how you would go about integrating the component
Specifically, research components for the following situations
speech recognition – we want to add the ability to use speech to create text labels, for which we need some sort of speech-to-text conversion component that is as reliable as possible
mouse gestures – we are having trouble writing code to recognize complex mouse gestures; find an existing component that can recognize mouse gestures reliably, possibly employing a learning algorithm
graphics – we want to replace Piccolo, as it is no longer supported, ideally with a drawing framework that has powerful functionality for future extensions yet has minimal impact on the current architecture
February 24, 2019 – 17:35:35
© 2007 University of California, Irvine – André van der Hoek

13. © 2007 University of California, Irvine – André van der Hoek
Assignment 5
Additional constraint
we have $800 in funds to spend on this project, but we want to save money for user studies and other assorted expenses, so cost should be minimized
if truly warranted, management can be requested to fund one “big ticket” component, up to possibly $10,000
February 24, 2019 – 17:35:35
© 2007 University of California, Irvine – André van der Hoek

14. © 2007 University of California, Irvine – André van der Hoek
Assignment 5
Create a 12 minute presentation that describes for each type of component
your search process
candidate components you considered
strengths
weaknesses
your selection criteria
the component you deem best (and why)
Create a document that describes, at the design and code level, the impact of incorporating the suggested mouse gesture component and the suggested replacement for Piccolo
from this document, someone should be able to make these changes “effortlessly”
no need to consider the speech recognition component in this document
February 24, 2019 – 17:35:35
© 2007 University of California, Irvine – André van der Hoek

15. © 2007 University of California, Irvine – André van der Hoek
Assignment 5
Presentation in class Tuesday, November 20th
Document due at the beginning of class Tuesday, November 20th
Graded on breadth and depth of component evaluation, as well as the thoroughness and insightfulness of the document
Each person also needs to submit a team evaluation (new forms available on class webpage)
February 24, 2019 – 17:35:35
© 2007 University of California, Irvine – André van der Hoek

16. © 2007 University of California, Irvine – André van der Hoek
Team Assignments
Team 1
BEDFORD, AURORA
KOLLA, SUBODH
JONAS, NICHOLAS
IGNACIO, JAN
Team 2
BAUTISTA, JEREMIAH
CHIU, ARTHUR
KWOK, MATHEW
PURPURA, DAVID
APPLEBAUM, WARREN
Team 3
CHISLOM, ALTON
BOSCH, CHRISTOPHER
LIU, ZHE
SAM, VINH
Team 4
HUANG, ALLEN
HIRANO, SEN
LAVAVESHKUL, MICHAEL
SHAFER, THOMAS
SHI, LINDA
Team 5
BAMBAEEROW, CAMERON
KNOBEL, JACOB
LAM, CYNTHIA
ESQUENAZI, NATHAN
YEGANYAN, MICHAEL
Team 6
DEMPSEY, MITCHELL
DAUZ, JONATHAN
DYKZEUL, BRADLEY
LEE, RICK
STEWART, DAVID
February 24, 2019 – 17:35:35
© 2007 University of California, Irvine – André van der Hoek