1. Theoretical differences between CDM and JI validation/determination
JI technical workshop
<Miguel Rescalvo Santandreu>
<13 Feb 2007>

2. VALIDATION Vs DETERMINATION
A different framework….
Version
24 February 2019

3. CDM JI GENERAL Kyoto Protocol Article 12 CDM modalities and procedures
JI modalities and procedures
GUIDANCE ON CRITERIA FOR BASELINE SETTING AND MONITORING. (annex 6 to JISC 4)
Version
24 February 2019

4. BASELINE AND MONITORING
CDM
Approved CDM baseline and monitoring methodologies.
Methodologies Panel.
Procedures in place for requesting clarification, deviation and review of approved methodologies. JI
Guidance provided by the JI Modalities and Procedures.
Applying CDM approved methodologies is an option but not the onlu one.
The accredited IE shall assess the methodology approach. (conservativeness, technical design, …)
Version
24 February 2019

5. “Tool for demonstration and assessment of additionality”
CDM
“Tool for demonstration and assessment of additionality” JI
Guidance provided by the JI Modalities and Procedures.
Version
24 February 2019

6. VALIDATION Vs DETERMINATION
A parallel process….
Version
24 February 2019

7. VALIDATION / DETERMINATION
CDM
Validation by DOE
30 days consultancy period.
Validation against an approved meth.
Submission for registration.
During 8 /4 weeks a review can be requested
Verification by DOE. Limitations. JI
Determination by an AIE
30 days consultancy period
Determination against an:
approved CDM meth
Meth based on a CDM METH
New methodology
Determination is final after 45 days.
There is not registration as in CDM
Determination of ERU.
Version
24 February 2019

8. Practical experiences
Methodologies applied for baseline and monitoring .
Different role of the AIE compared to DOE.
Version
24 February 2019

9. Version
24 February 2019