1. Faculty Prioritization Process - Fall 2018
Faculty Senate Presentation
August 15, 2018
Presented by Tram Vo-Kumamoto, VPI and Co-chair of Faculty Prioritization Committee

2. Provide the President with two prioritized lists for Replacement & New FT faculty requests to inform decision-making regarding the announcements of new faculty positions.
COMMITTEE CHARGE

3. Represent the interest of the college community
Represent the interest of the college community. Committee members will make decisions on campus- wide needs and opportunities.
Promote fairness and equity in resource allocations
Align your decision making with Mission and goals for the college
GUIDING PRINCIPLES

4. GROUND RULES Come prepared and on time
Stay mentally and physically present
Ask genuine questions
Explain reasoning and intent
Test assumptions and inferences
Listen with an open mind
Stay on point
GROUND RULES

5. Timeline Day of the Week Date/Dates Time Location Action Tuesday
Date/Dates
Time
Location
Action
Tuesday
September 4, 2018
3:00 PM - 5:00 PM
AGB 106
Committee to meet to review process and to receive access to packets
Tues - Fri
September 4 - 7, 2018
Online
Review and provide questions regarding proposals
Friday
September 7, 2018
9:00 AM
Deadline for questions pertaining to submissions to OOI
September 14, 2018
Deadline for Divisions (Chairs and Deans) to provide responses to the questions to OOI
Monday
September 17, 2018
Committee to meet for proposal review and ranking
Week of September 24
Academic Senate President and College President to review requests
Week of October 1
College President meets with Cabinet to review requests
October 16, 2018
8:00 AM
Prioritized requests due to Chancellor's Office to be placed on Board of Trustees Docket for approval
October 29, 2018
5:00 PM
HS 145
Board of Trustees Meeting for request approval
Timeline

6. Community Needs

9. 2016-2025 Workforce Projections
Emsi Q Data Set –

10. Emsi Q3 2018 Data Set – www. economicmodeling. com
Emsi Q Data Set – LQ=Location Quotient (concentration in region)

11. College Needs

13. Saddleback College will foster an environment characterized by creativity, innovation, respectful interactions and collaboration.
Saddleback College will promote students’ success by enhancing the teaching and learning environment
Saddleback College will advance economic and workforce development through regional partnerships with educational institutions and industry by strengthening career technical education.
Saddleback College will strengthen long-term financial health and institutional effectiveness through integrated planning and resource allocation.
Strategic Goals

14. Full-Time Faculty Count at Present

16. 4,1.7%

17. FTES/# of FT Faculty
Data point reflects the ratio of Full-time Equivalent Students to 1 FT faculty.

19. PT Faculty/FT Faculty
Data point reflects the ratio of PT faculty to 1 FT faculty

21. Weekly Student Contact Hour (WSCH)/FTEF
Data point reflects the ratio of weekly student contact hours to 1 Full-time Equivalent Faculty (includes PT and FT faculty). Also known as “productivity”.

23. Ranking

24. CRITERIA & POINTS: 7.25 total points
Narrative (70%) – highest score is 5
FTES/# of FT faculty in area (30%) – highest score is 2.25
CRITERIA & POINTS: total points
Each rep will score each request 1 (low to need/goal) to 5 (high to need/goal)
Final score will be total of all scores for the request/24
Counseling, librarians& Nursing will have a multiplier bc scored on narrative only
ordered from high to low & broken up into 5ths
2.25pts., 1.80 pts., pts., 0.90 pts., pts.
(1 FTES= 1 student enrolled in 15 hours for 2 terms)

25. Scoring Guide for Narratives
1 point
3 points
5 points
Data/Evidence in support of Need
Minimal needs as substantiated by appropriate data
Moderate need as substantiated by appropriate data
Significant need as substantiated by appropriate data
Critical for Program Goals and Needs
Lack of position would minimally impact the program's ability to support student success
Lack of position would moderately impact the program's ability to support student success
Lack of position would significantly impact the program's ability to support student success
Critical to College Goals and Needs
Lack of position would minimally impact the College's capacity to achieve its goals
Lack of position would moderately impact the College's capacity to achieve its goals
Lack of position would significantly impact the College's capacity to achieve its goals
Critical to Community/
Culture/Industry Needs
Lack of position would minimally impact the College's capacity to support the community, culture, & industry
Lack of position would moderately impact the College's capacity to support the community, culture, & industry
Lack of position would significantly impact the College's capacity to support the community, culture, & industry
Scoring Guide for Narratives

26. Proposal Review

27. Submit questions by 9AM, Friday September 7 via form.

28. Answers to questions Due by 9AM, Friday, September 14.
Compiled and sent out to committee to review during weekend prior to Monday, September 17 meeting.
Answers to questions

29. Next meeting
Monday, September 17, 3-5PM, AGB 106

30. Discussion of Position Requests & Scoring
No more than 3 minutes per position
Scoring guide for the narrative portion will be provided for each position request
Scores for the FTES/# of FT Faculty will be presented
Scoring will be done electronically and is not anonymous
Discussion of Position Requests & Scoring