Presentation on theme: "April 16, 2012. the major legal developments in the implementation of the Anti-Bullying Bill of Rights (ABBR) the unique issues that arise related to."— Presentation transcript:
the major legal developments in the implementation of the Anti-Bullying Bill of Rights (ABBR) the unique issues that arise related to bullying in athletics, students with disabilities, and suicidal ideation how to apply the law to real-world situations and avoid common pitfalls resources that are available to assist districts What specific steps to take to move your district forward and address the overarching issue of school climate
January 5, 2011 Governor Christie signed into law the Anti-Bullying Bill of Rights Act New law went into effect September 2011 Amended the 2002 anti-bullying law Enacted in response to high profile incidents and the report of the Commission on Bullying Prevention
May, 2011 - Teen Dating Violence law signed, in effect in September October, 2011 - NJDOE issued guidance on required professional/recommended PD December, 2011 – NJDOE issued more detailed guidance on new law December – First reported case in New Jersey addressing new bullying law – K.L. v. Evesham
January, 2012 – Council on Local Mandates announces decision finding law to be unconstitutional in case brought by Allamuchy School District March 2012 – Governor signs revised law providing for $1 million in funding, with restrictions, and creating task force to review law Today – Law remains fully in effect
Maintains current definition of bullying and current procedures Appropriates $1 million for the Bullying Prevention Fund School districts may apply for grants to use for programs, approaches or personnel Must make affirmative showing that district explored available free resources first Establishes 7-member Task Force to report within 180 days and annually for 3 years
What is bullying? Who can investigate and what process should be followed? How do we address conduct away from school grounds, including cyberbullying? What information must be shared with parents?
How do we address staff members accused of bullying? What is the role of the School Safety Team? How do we avoid legal liability? How do we create a safe learning environment for all students?
Harassment, Intimidation or Bullying (HIB) 1. Types of behaviors included: ANY gesture, or ANY written, verbal or physical act, or ANY electronic communication Can be a single incident or series of incidents
2. Motivation for behavior: ANY actual OR perceived characteristic TYPES OF CHARACTERISTICS: race, color, religion, ancestry, national origin, gender, sexual orientation, gender identity and expression, or mental/physical/sensory disability, or ANY OTHER DISTINGUISHING CHARACTERISTIC
3. Location of behavior: On school property At school-sponsored function On a school bus Off school grounds (including cyberspace)
4. BEHAVIOR MUST CAUSE SUBSTANTIAL DISRUPTION OR INTERFERENCE IN SCHOOL OR OF STUDENT RIGHTS, AND MEET ONE OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: Physical or emotional harm to student or damage to students property, or placing student in fear of harm to self or property Effect of insulting or demeaning student or group of students OR Create hostile educational environment for student by interfering with students education OR severely or pervasively causing physical or emotional harm to student
Actual or Perceived Characteristics NOT meant for relationship disputes Substantial Disruption Not minor, passing issues Imbalance in Power Although not in formal definition, recognized in Bullying Commission report and by most experts
Harmful or demeaning conduct motivated only by another reason, for example, a dispute about relationships or personal belongings, or aggressive conduct without identifiable motivation, does not come within the statutory definition of bullying. See K.L. v. Evesham Sch. Dist., 423 N.J. Super. 337, 351 (App. Div. 2011).
Schools duty goes beyond portal to portal Legal duty existed since 1971 decision in R.R. v. Shore Regional Duty has been in NJ administrative code since 2005 (N.J.A.C. 6A:16-7.6)
New law doesnt change scope of schools responsibility for student conduct away from school grounds Recent cases involving student conduct outside school (e.g., Ramapo-Indian Hills; J.S. and Layshock) do not change this standard
Right to know about incident immediately Right to written summary of findings Right to hearing before BOE Right to appeal decision to Commissioner Right to challenge findings in state or federal court under various discrimination laws
Parents of both parties have right to notice on same day incident occurs Need plan to address foreseeable incidents that occur after school hours at school events, field trips, on way home from school Parent has right to written notice within 5 school days after results of investigation reported to board
Written report to parent must address: Nature of investigation Whether district found evidence of HIB Whether discipline was imposed or services provided
One case suggests possibly broader rights: K.L. v. Evesham (case took place prior to new law) Held that parent had rights to see school districts disciplinary referral form with redactions of other students names Form pertained to both alleged victim and aggressor Form had to be provided under FERPA, OPRA and common law Court noted nothing in ABBR expressly modifies pupil records law
Important because NJDOE and many PD programs include student surveys to assess climate Law requires 2-weeks prior parent permission N.J.S.A. 18A:36-34 Applies to anonymous surveys
Applies to surveys that reveal information concerning: mental and psychological problems that are potentially embarassing to student or family Illegal, anti-social, self-incriminating and demeaning behavior
ABS must be lead investigator (Cant be Principal or Assistant Principal) No leeway to screen cases Superintendent role is to decide on discipline and other interventions, NOT to change findings
Every case must be: reported to the board at one monthly meeting, then written report goes to parent, then parent may request hearing Whether or not parent requests hearing, board must affirm, reject, modify act to affirm, reject or modify decision reached by supt.
Is there a conflict of interest for ABS? Are there immediate steps that need to be taken while matter is investigated? Should DYFS and law enforcement be contacted? Are steps being taken to avoid potential allegations of retaliation and tampering with the investigation?
Chaired by ABS Critical role is to focus on school climate Must receive copies of all allegations and investigation reports Charged with identifying patterns of behavior and making meaningful recommendations Key to moving away from reactive, crisis management approach Parent role critical, but limited Key to avoiding legal liability
In May 2011 Governor Christie signed into law a statute addressing teen dating violence--new law went into effect September 2011 Overlaps with other existing laws, including Anti-Bullying Bill of Rights, sexting statute, various criminal statutes
Requires dating violence education in Health/PE curriculum for grades 7-12 Defines dating violence and dating partner Schools must create policies that incorporate all tenets of the new law Districts must be prepared to implement the new law immediately
Dating Violence means a pattern of behavior where one person either threatens to use, or actually uses, physical, sexual, verbal, or emotional abuse to control a dating partner. Dating Partner means any person involved in an intimate association with another individual that is primarily characterized by the expectation of affectionate involvement, whether casual, serious, or long-term
At school means in a classroom or anywhere on school property, on a school bus or other school-related vehicle, at an official school bus stop, or at any school-sponsored activity or event whether or not it is on school grounds
Sexual harassment can be a form of dating violence Dating relationship gone bad can lead to one dating partner singling out another due to an actual or perceived characteristic Dating violence requires pattern of behavior, conduct on school grounds – contrast with HIB
1 day to report dating violence for staff v. 2 for HIB Mental health assessment for dating violence in DOE model policy Principal/designee can do investigation in dating violence, no requirement for board action in every case
For more information go to: FEA website – www.featraining.orgwww.featraining.org LEGAL ONE website – www.legalonenj.orgwww.legalonenj.org NJPSA website – www.njpsa.orgwww.njpsa.org NJDOE – www.state.nj.us/educationwww.state.nj.us/education
NJ State Bar Foundation – www.njsbf.orgwww.njsbf.org NJ Traumatic Loss Coalitions - http://ubhc.umdnj.edu/brti/tlc/index.htm http://ubhc.umdnj.edu/brti/tlc/index.htm Hazelden Foundation - http://www.hazelden.org/web/public/bullyin g_prevention.page http://www.hazelden.org/web/public/bullyin g_prevention.page NJ Juvenile Justice Commission - http://www.nj.gov/lps/jjc/index.html http://www.nj.gov/lps/jjc/index.html