1. 3D path calibration for the 12/30/2009 Imperial Valley Earthquake
Shengji Wei(1), Rob Graves(2), Xiangyan Tian(2), Zhongwen Zhan(2), Eric Fielding(3) and Don Helmberger(1)
1, SeismoLab, GPS, Caltech, Pasadena
2, USGS, Pasadena
3, JPL, Caltech, Pasadena

2. Outline 1, Event mechanism from teleseismic and regional inversion
2, Static location and slip model
3, Comparison between 1D, 3D synthetic and the data at different frequency bands for the CVM4m and HVM6.2 models.

3. Source mechanism from teleseismic inversion

4. Source mechanism from regional seismic inversion

5. Static location and Inversion

6. 1D and 2D profiles from 3D models
Az:310 degree

7. Az:310~330, Frequency: 10~100s, Tangential
CVM4m
Data 1D
HVM6.2

8. Az:270~310, Frequency: 10~100s, Tangential
CVM4m
Data 1D
HVM6.2

9. 20~200s
1D vs Data
3D(HVM6.2) vs Data
3D(CVM4m) vs Data

10. 10~100s
1D vs Data
3D(HVM6.2) vs Data
3D(CVM4m) vs Data

11. 5~100s
1D vs Data
3D(HVM6.2) vs Data
3D(CVM4m) vs Data

12. 10~100s(vel)
1D vs Data
3D(HVM6.2) vs Data
3D(CVM4m) vs Data

13. 5~100s(vel)
1D vs Data
3D(HVM6.2) vs Data
3D(CVM4m) vs Data