Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byGlenna Dharmawijaya Modified over 5 years ago
1
Impact of diabetes mellitus on outcomes of superficial femoral artery endoluminal interventions
Andrew M. Bakken, MD, Eugene Palchik, MD, Joseph P. Hart, MD, Jeffrey M. Rhodes, MD, Wael E. Saad, MD, Mark G. Davies, MD, PhD Journal of Vascular Surgery Volume 46, Issue 5, Pages e4 (November 2007) DOI: /j.jvs Copyright © 2007 The Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
2
Fig 1 Primary patency curves for patients without diabetes (black line), non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM, gray line), and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM, light gray line) presenting with claudication. Primary patency is not significantly different between groups by Kaplan-Meier analysis. The P values for the NIDDM and IDDM groups are in comparison with the nondiabetic group. Journal of Vascular Surgery , e4DOI: ( /j.jvs ) Copyright © 2007 The Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
3
Fig 2 Assisted patency curves for patients without diabetes (black line), non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM, gray line), and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM, light gray line) presenting with claudication. Assisted patency is significantly lower for IDDM patients relative to non-diabetic patients by Kaplan-Meier analysis. The P values for the NIDDM and IDDM groups are in comparison with the nondiabetic group. Journal of Vascular Surgery , e4DOI: ( /j.jvs ) Copyright © 2007 The Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
4
Fig 3 Freedom from restenosis curves for patients without diabetes (black line), non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM, gray line), and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM, light gray line) presenting with claudication. Freedom from restenosis is significantly lower for IDDM patients relative to nondiabetic patients by Kaplan-Meier analysis. The P values for the NIDDM and IDDM groups are in comparison with the non-diabetic group. Journal of Vascular Surgery , e4DOI: ( /j.jvs ) Copyright © 2007 The Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
5
Fig 4 Primary patency curves for patients without diabetes (black line), non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM, gray line), and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM, light gray line) presenting with critical limb ischemia. Primary patency is not significantly different between groups by Kaplan-Meier analysis. The P values for the NIDDM and IDDM groups are in comparison with the non-diabetic group. Journal of Vascular Surgery , e4DOI: ( /j.jvs ) Copyright © 2007 The Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
6
Fig 5 Assisted patency curves for patients without diabetes (black line), non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM, gray line), and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM, light gray line) presenting with critical limb ischemia. Assisted patency is not significantly different between groups by Kaplan-Meier analysis. The P values for the NIDDM and IDDM groups are in comparison with the non-diabetic group. Journal of Vascular Surgery , e4DOI: ( /j.jvs ) Copyright © 2007 The Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
7
Fig 6 Freedom from restenosis curves for patients without diabetes (black line), non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM, gray line), and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM, light gray line) presenting with critical limb ischemia. Freedom from restenosis is not significantly different between groups by Kaplan-Meier analysis. The P values for the NIDDM and IDDM groups are in comparison with the non-diabetic group. Journal of Vascular Surgery , e4DOI: ( /j.jvs ) Copyright © 2007 The Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
8
Fig 7 Limb salvage curves for patients without diabetes (black line), non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM, gray line), and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM, light gray line) presenting with critical limb ischemia. Limb salvage is significantly lower for NIDDM and IDDM patients relative to non-diabetic patients by Kaplan-Meier analysis. The P values for the NIDDM and IDDM groups are in comparison with the nondiabetic group. Journal of Vascular Surgery , e4DOI: ( /j.jvs ) Copyright © 2007 The Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
9
Appendix Fig E1 (online only)
Overall survival for patients presenting with claudication is not significantly different between groups by Kaplan-Meier analysis. The P values for the non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) groups are in comparison with the non-diabetic group. The number of patients “at risk” is listed at 6-month intervals for each group. Journal of Vascular Surgery , e4DOI: ( /j.jvs ) Copyright © 2007 The Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
10
Appendix Fig E2 (online only)
Overall survival for patients presenting with critical limb ischemia. Survival among patients presenting with claudication is not significantly different between groups by Kaplan-Meier analysis. The P values for non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) and insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM) groups are in comparison with the non-diabetic group. The number of patients “at risk” is listed at 6-month intervals for each group. Journal of Vascular Surgery , e4DOI: ( /j.jvs ) Copyright © 2007 The Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.