1. Permanent access from a Danish perspective
Søren Hovmand & Anette Schneider
DTU Library, Technical University of Denmark

2. Project 2015 – all Danish Universities
Licensing part
Analysis (the coverage in Portico/LOCKSS)
Mapping (the rights in current agreements)
Negotiation (clauses added to the agreements)
Technical part
LOCKSS box in a PLN
Report
Results
Next step

3. Conclusion - Analysis Low coverage if Open Access included
OA publishers do not think on archiving
No solution (GLOCKSS or Portico) will cover everything
Portico better coverage than Global LOCKSS

4. Rights - before and after the project
Number
Long term preservation
Continued access
Transfer
University agreements
276 publishers
26% (43%)
37% (55%)
2% (4%)
Consortia agreements
55 publishers
51%
69% (73%)
47%

5. Conclusion - Rights Not easy to get answers from publishers
Small publishers – no archiving solution
Small publishers – no agreements

6. Test of LOCKSS in a PLN
Test participants – the State and University Library, the Royal Library, DTU Library
Ingest – from: Open Journal Systems, Taylor & Francis, Hindawi, local full text
Repair – between boxes and from Publisher platform
Integration with SFX

7. Conclusion - PLN
Easy to install. Ingest, repair and SFX integration was successful
Efficient support from the LOCKSS team
Clarification needed on price models

8. Future - recommendations
A national permanent archiving solution based on LOCKSS/PLN should be a strategic priority in the coming DEFF strategy
DEFF should prioritize and support the development of a national sustainable and robust solution
Follow and cooperate with the UK solution – Safenet
Focus on both licensed and Open Access journals
Rights in all agreements to allow archiving solution
Knowledge Exchange should also prioritize rights about archiving solutions
Focus on E-books as well
Transparent price model – LOCKSS/PLN