1. The Omniscope
2019/2/17
Based on a paper I’ve written with Matias Zaldarriaga which we plan to post to astro-ph once this conference ends.
MT & Matias Zaldarriaga, arXiv: ,

2. T H E O M N I S C O P E R S Courtney Peterson Tongyan Lin Mike matejek
2019/2/17
Mike matejek
Ed Morgan
Joel Villasenor
Jackie Hewitt
Andy Lutomirski
Adrian Liu
Chris Williams
When I first had the idea about a year ago, I thought it was rather obvious so that the reason it hadn’t been done must be that it was somehow flawed.
What we’ve realized since then is that it’s not flawed, but simply didn’t make sense until now (Moore’s law, 21cm application didn’t exist)
T H E O M N I S C O P E R S

3. T H E O M N I S C O P E R S Scott Morrison
2019/2/17
Scott Morrison
Based on a paper I’ve written with Matias Zaldarriaga which we plan to post to astro-ph once this conference ends.
T H E O M N I S C O P E R S

4. Henrique Pondé Oliveira Pinto
2019/2/17
Kris Zarb
Scott Morrison
Henrique Pondé Oliveira Pinto
Nevada Sanchez
Joe Lee
Based on a paper I’ve written with Matias Zaldarriaga which we plan to post to astro-ph once this conference ends.

5. T H E O M N I S C O P E R S Matias Zaldarriaga
2019/2/17
When I first had the idea about a year ago, I thought it was rather obvious so that the reason it hadn’t been done must be that it was somehow flawed.
What we’ve realized since then is that it’s not flawed, but simply didn’t make sense until now (Moore’s law, 21cm application didn’t exist)
T H E O M N I S C O P E R S

6. 2019/2/17
When I first had the idea about a year ago, I thought it was rather obvious so that the reason it hadn’t been done must be that it was somehow flawed.
What we’ve realized since then is that it’s not flawed, but simply didn’t make sense until now (Moore’s law, 21cm application didn’t exist)

7. Foreground removal astro-ph/0501081, 0807.3952 0903.4890
2019/2/17
Foreground modeling
Foreground removal astro-ph/ ,
Optimal mapmaking
Automatic calibration
Faster correlation ,
Corner turning
Survey design optimization
Based on a paper I’ve written with Matias Zaldarriaga which we plan to post to astro-ph once this conference ends.

8. Single-dish telescope:
How get huge sensitivity at low cost?
2019/2/17
2019/2/17
Sensitivity T (A)-1/2
Single-dish telescope:
cost A1.35
Interferometer:
cost N2  A2
FFTT telescope idea:
cost A, ~2
Telescopes as Fourier transformers 8

9. 2019/2/17
When I first had the idea about a year ago, I thought it was rather obvious so that the reason it hadn’t been done must be that it was somehow flawed.
What we’ve realized since then is that it’s not flawed, but simply didn’t make sense until now (Moore’s law, 21cm application didn’t exist)

10. 2019/2/17
2019/2/17 10

11. Correlate this:
2019/2/17
2019/2/17 11

12. The sensitivity frontier
2019/2/17
The sensitivity frontier
Omniscope
MT & Zaldarriaga, arXiv:

13. LSS 21cm tomography Our observable universe Last scattering surface
2019/2/17
Our observable universe
LSS
Last scattering surface
21cm tomography

14. Our observable universe
2019/2/17
Our observable universe
LSS
Spatial curvature:
WMAP+SDSS: tot= 0.01
Planck: tot=
21cm: tot=0.0002
Mao, MT, McQuinn, Zahn & Zaldarriaga 2008
21cm tomography

15. Our observable universe
2019/2/17
Our observable universe
LSS
Spectral index running:
Planck:  =0.005
21cm =
2-potential: 0.0007
4-potential: 0.008
Mao, MT, McQuinn, Zahn & Zaldarriaga 2008
21cm tomography

16. Our observable universe
Neutrino mass:
WMAP+SDSS: m <0.3 eV
+LyF: m <0.17 eV
Oscillations m>0.04 eV
Future lensing: m~0.03 eV
21cm: m=0.007 eV
2019/2/17
Our observable universe
LSS
Final punchline: we’ll be talking lots at this meeting about fascinating physics we’ve learned from current cosmology data. But let’s not become complacent and lose sight of small a fraction of our universe we’ve mapped, and how much better we can do if we map the rest.
Mao, MT, McQuinn, Zahn & Zaldarriaga 2008
21cm tomography

17. 2019/2/17