Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

PMNS Matrix Elements Without Assuming Unitarity

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "PMNS Matrix Elements Without Assuming Unitarity"— Presentation transcript:

1 PMNS Matrix Elements Without Assuming Unitarity
NOW06, September 9-16, 2006, Otranto PMNS Matrix Elements Without Assuming Unitarity Enrique Fernández Martínez Universidad Autónoma de Madrid hep-ph/ In collaboration with S. Antusch, C. Biggio, M.B. Gavela and J. López Pavón Thanks also to C. Peña Garay

2 Motivations n masses and mixing → evidence of New Physics beyond the SM Typical explanations (see-saw) involve NP at higher energies This NP often induces deviations from unitarity of the PMNS at low energy We will analyze the present constraints on the mixing matrix without assuming unitarity

3 The general idea

4 Effective Lagrangian 3 light n
deviations from unitarity from NP at high energy

5 Effective Lagrangian 3 light n
deviations from unitarity from NP at high energy Diagonal mass and canonical kinetic terms: unitary transformation + rescaling N non-unitary

6 Effective Lagrangian 3 light n
deviations from unitarity from NP at high energy Diagonal mass and canonical kinetic terms: unitary transformation + rescaling unchanged N non-unitary

7 The effects of non-unitarity…
… appear in the interactions ni ni W - Z nj This affects electroweak processes…

8 The effects of non-unitarity…
… appear in the interactions ni ni W - Z nj This affects electroweak processes… … and oscillation probabilities…

9 n oscillations in vacuum
mass basis

10 n oscillations in vacuum
mass basis flavour basis with

11 n oscillations in vacuum
mass basis flavour basis with

12 n oscillations in vacuum
mass basis flavour basis with Zero-distance effect:

13 n oscillations in matter
VCC VNC 2 families

14 n oscillations in matter
VCC VNC 2 families 1. non-diagonal elements NC effects do not disappear

15 N elements from oscillations: e-row
Only disappearance exps → information only on |Nai|2 CHOOZ: Δ12≈0 K2K (nm→nm ): Δ23 Degeneracy cannot be disentangled UNITARITY

16 N elements from oscillations: e-row
KamLAND: Δ23>>1 KamLAND+CHOOZ+K2K → first degeneracy solved

17 N elements from oscillations: e-row
KamLAND: Δ23>>1 KamLAND+CHOOZ+K2K → first degeneracy solved SNO: SNO → all |Nei|2 determined

18 N elements from oscillations: m-row
Atmospheric + K2K: Δ12≈0 UNITARITY Degeneracy cannot be disentangled

19 N elements from oscillations only
without unitarity OSCILLATIONS 3s with unitarity OSCILLATIONS González-García 04

20 (NN†) from decays (NN†)aa W ni la W decays ni Z nj Info on Invisible Z
Universality tests W ni la lb g Rare leptons decays Info on (NN†)ab

21 (NN†) and (N†N) from decays
Experimentally

22 (NN†) and (N†N) from decays
Experimentally → N is unitary at % level

23 N elements from oscillations & decays
without unitarity OSCILLATIONS +DECAYS 3s with unitarity OSCILLATIONS González-García 04

24 In the future… MEASUREMENT OF MATRIX ELEMENTS
|Ne3|2 , m-row → MINOS, T2K, Superbeams, NUFACT… t-row → high energies: NUFACT phases → appearance experiments: NUFACTs, b-beams

25 In the future… MEASUREMENT OF MATRIX ELEMENTS
|Ne3|2 , m-row → MINOS, T2K, Superbeams, NUFACT… t-row → high energies: NUFACT phases → appearance experiments: NUFACTs, b-beams TESTS OF UNITARITY Rare leptons decays m→eg t→eg t→mg PRESENT

26 In the future… MEASUREMENT OF MATRIX ELEMENTS
|Ne3|2 , m-row → MINOS, T2K, Superbeams, NUFACT… t-row → high energies: NUFACT phases → appearance experiments: NUFACTs, b-beams TESTS OF UNITARITY Rare leptons decays m→eg t→eg t→mg PRESENT FUTURE ~ MEG ~ NUFACT

27 In the future… MEASUREMENT OF MATRIX ELEMENTS
|Ne3|2 , m-row → MINOS, T2K, Superbeams, NUFACT… t-row → high energies: NUFACT phases → appearance experiments: NUFACTs, b-beams TESTS OF UNITARITY Rare leptons decays m→eg t→eg t→mg ZERO-DISTANCE EFFECT 40Kt Iron calorimeter near NUFACT ne→nm 4Kt OPERA-like near NUFACT ne→nt nm→nt PRESENT FUTURE ~ MEG ~ NUFACT

28 In the future… MEASUREMENT OF MATRIX ELEMENTS
|Ne3|2 , m-row → MINOS, T2K, Superbeams, NUFACT… t-row → high energies: NUFACT phases → appearance experiments: NUFACTs, b-beams TESTS OF UNITARITY Rare leptons decays m→eg t→eg t→mg ZERO-DISTANCE EFFECT 40Kt Iron calorimeter near NUFACT ne→nm 4Kt OPERA-like near NUFACT ne→nt nm→nt PRESENT FUTURE ~ MEG ~ NUFACT

29 Conclusions If we don’t assume unitarity for the leptonic mixing matrix Present oscillation experiments alone can only measure half the elements EW decays confirms unitarity at % level Combining oscillations and EW decays, bounds for all the elements can be found comparable with the ones obtained with the unitary analysis Future experiments can: improve the present measurements on the e- and m-rows give information on the t-row and on phases (appearance exps) test unitarity by constraining the zero-distance effect with a near detector

30 Back-up slides

31 …adding near detectors…
Test of zero-distance effect: KARMEN: (NN†)me <0.05 NOMAD: (NN†)mt <0.09 (NN†)et <0.013 MINOS: (NN†)mm =1±0.05 BUGEY: (NN†)ee =1±0.04 → also all |Nmi|2 determined

32 Non-unitarity from see-saw
Integrate out NR d=5 operator it gives mass to n d=6 operator it renormalises kinetic energy Broncano, Gavela, Jenkins 02

33 Number of events n produced and detected in CC Exceptions:
measured flux leptonic production mechanism detection via NC

34 (NN†) from decays: GF (NN†)aa ni W W decays la ni Info on Z
GF is measured in m-decay m e ni Nmi N*ej ni Z nj Info on (NN†)aa Invisible Z Universality tests

35 CHOOZ 10-3

36 Unitarity in the quark sector
Quarks are detected in the final state → we can directly measure |Vab| K0 p - d W+ Vus* ni e+ Uei ex: |Vus| from K0 →p - e+ ne → ∑i|Uei|2 =1 if U unitary With Vab we check unitarity conditions: ex: |Vud|2+|Vus|2+|Vub|2 -1 = ±0.0011 → Measurements of VCKM elements relies on UPMNS unitarity

37 Unitarity in the quark sector
Quarks are detected in the final state → we can directly measure |Vab| K0 p - d W+ Vus* ne e+ ex: |Vus| from K0 →p - e+ ne With Vab we check unitarity conditions: ex: |Vud|2+|Vus|2+|Vub|2 -1 = ±0.0011 → Measurements of VCKM elements relies on UPMNS unitarity decays → only (NN†) and (N†N) N elements → we need oscillations to study the unitarity of N: no assumptions on VCKM With leptons:


Download ppt "PMNS Matrix Elements Without Assuming Unitarity"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google