2 Let us start with a sentence in the active voice and its passive counterpart.
3 Everybody loves her. She is loved by everybody.
4 The preposition by in the passive sentence must be marked as syntactic: it does not occupy a node in the semantic representation.
5 Everybody loves her. She is loved (by) everybody.
6 Is in is loved, as opposed to was in was loved, is a tense marker, functioning as a predicate. The carrier of the corresponding meaning in the active sentence is a morpheme, which we mark as incorporated.
7 Everybody love her. She is loved (by) everybody. Alternatively, we could extract a portmanteau morpheme from is: (is), but that would be an unnecessary complication.
8 This is not a complete representation. The tense markers in both sentences function as a two-place predicate, the first valency position of which is occupied by the implicit speech act verb «say».
9 Everybody love her. She is loved (by) everybody. «s.» «s.» = «(I) say»
10 The implicit verb also dominates the syntactic top node, i.e. love.
11 Everybody love her. She is loved (by) everybody. «s.» «s.» = «(I) say»
12 In the following tense markers and speech act predicates will be disregarded.
13 Everybody love her. She is loved (by) everybody. «s.» «s.» = «(I) say»
14 Everybody loves her. She (is) loved (by) everybody.
15 Now let us compare an ordinary sentence with its cleft counterpart.
27 Instead of buying it and putting it on the wall I decided to analyse it. The first step is to extract the verbs out of the nouns love and choice. After that we can easily establish the subject and object relations.
29 Finally, let us conflate the two parts into one sentence. The comma separating the clauses represents a two-place predicate with the meaning «then».
30 Choose your love, love your choice., (comma/pause) = «then»
31 Now we can compare this sentence with a more basic and explicit paraphrase: Choose the person you love, then love the person you chose. … or still more explicitly: Choose the person that you love, then love the person that you chose.
32 We see that the object relation arrows in each clause now point to two separate words. These are connected by means of the definite article, here with a cataphoric function. Choose the person that you love. The content of the connection is coreferentiality.
33 Note also in the explicit paraphrase the different tenses: … you love vs … you chose. To account for this we must extract the corresponding tense morphemes: Choose the person you love, Love the person you chose,
34 Choose your love «PRES», love your choice «PRET». In the original sentence this difference is totally implicit, but we can still represent it:
35 The difference in tense can be traced back to a semantic distinction between the two verbs, namely the opposition athelic / thelic. THE END
36 Whoops, I forgot overt derivatives, i.e. words formed from love and its equivalents by means of suffixation. cat er Marys er
37 In Russian, different nouns are used in this case. tel koshek Mashin nik
38 There are also derivatives expressing the converse relation. ec caricy the queens «like» favourite min lingsmelodi my favourite tune
39 Empty verbs in English: Peter (makes) love (to) Mary. Peter älskar (med) Mary. Mary (fell in) love (with) Peter. Mary förälskade (sig i) Peter.
40 Cf. also the paraphrases: Peter (is) Marys ( er). Peter (makes) love (to) Mary.
41 In Russian, the equivalent of make love cannot realize the second position. Oni (zanimajutsja) ljubovju. They (make) love.
42 Moi ye menja zhdali. The following could be a way of representing substantivized adjectives and participles. My loved ones (were) waiting (for) me.