Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Kartik Chandrasekhar Ramon Fuentes Daniel Tomilson Andy Cuming Adam Taylor Jeff Chan.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Kartik Chandrasekhar Ramon Fuentes Daniel Tomilson Andy Cuming Adam Taylor Jeff Chan."— Presentation transcript:

1 Kartik Chandrasekhar Ramon Fuentes Daniel Tomilson Andy Cuming Adam Taylor Jeff Chan

2 Introduction goes here

3 The selection process Design requirements - Maximum stiffness/weight ratio - Minimum cost - Easy manufacture

4 What were aiming for

5 A bit about nanotubes????

6 Composite Sandwich Pros: Provides descent stiffness/weight Easy to manufacture Good crack dissipation Cheap Cons: Foam/honeycomb provide better stiffness/weight ratio Does not fully use the 3cm available

7 Our Fibre Metal Laminate Al 2024 Al Mesh (crack dissipation) Carbon Fibre Weave Al 2024 CF weave CF weave Al 2024

8 Foam and other cores.. Why not?

9 Conclusion References: o N. Sharma et al, Fatigue of Foam and Honeycomb Core Composite Sandwich Structures: A Tutorial, Journal of Sandwich Structures and Materials, SAGE Publications o Robert M. Jones, Mechanics of Composite Materials, Brunner-Routledge o J. Gere et al, Mechanics of Materials, Cengage Learning TM


Download ppt "Kartik Chandrasekhar Ramon Fuentes Daniel Tomilson Andy Cuming Adam Taylor Jeff Chan."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google