Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byΔαρείος Τοκατλίδης Modified over 5 years ago
1
Accuracy of administrative data versus clinical data to evaluate carotid endarterectomy and carotid stenting Rodney P. Bensley, MD, Shunsuke Yoshida, MD, Ruby C. Lo, MD, Margriet Fokkema, MD, Allen D. Hamdan, MD, Mark C. Wyers, MD, Elliot L. Chaikof, MD, PhD, Marc L. Schermerhorn, MD Journal of Vascular Surgery Volume 58, Issue 2, Pages (August 2013) DOI: /j.jvs Copyright © 2013 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
2
Fig 1 The 2 × 2 table used to calculate sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). NSQIP, National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Journal of Vascular Surgery , DOI: ( /j.jvs ) Copyright © 2013 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
3
Fig 2 Flow diagram depicting all patients captured by administrative data, National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) data, and physician chart review. CAS, Carotid artery stenting; CEA, carotid endarterectomy. Journal of Vascular Surgery , DOI: ( /j.jvs ) Copyright © 2013 Society for Vascular Surgery Terms and Conditions
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.