Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Comparison of Robotics, Functional Electrical Stimulation, and Motor Learning Methods for Treatment of Persistent Upper Extremity Dysfunction After Stroke:

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Comparison of Robotics, Functional Electrical Stimulation, and Motor Learning Methods for Treatment of Persistent Upper Extremity Dysfunction After Stroke:"— Presentation transcript:

1 Comparison of Robotics, Functional Electrical Stimulation, and Motor Learning Methods for Treatment of Persistent Upper Extremity Dysfunction After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial  Jessica McCabe, MPT, Michelle Monkiewicz, DPT, John Holcomb, PhD, Svetlana Pundik, MD, MS, Janis J. Daly, PhD, MS  Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation  Volume 96, Issue 6, Pages (June 2015) DOI: /j.apmr Copyright © 2015 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Terms and Conditions

2 Fig 1 Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials diagram. Depiction of subject selection, group allocation, attrition and data analysis. Abbreviations: FES ML, FES plus ML group; ML, ML group; ROB ML, robotics plus ML group. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation  , DOI: ( /j.apmr ) Copyright © 2015 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Terms and Conditions

3 Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 2015 96, 981-990DOI: (10.1016/j.apmr.2014.10.022)
Copyright © 2015 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine Terms and Conditions


Download ppt "Comparison of Robotics, Functional Electrical Stimulation, and Motor Learning Methods for Treatment of Persistent Upper Extremity Dysfunction After Stroke:"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google