Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Corrections to "Estimating the glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine is better than from cystatin C for evaluating risk factors associated.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Corrections to "Estimating the glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine is better than from cystatin C for evaluating risk factors associated."— Presentation transcript:

1 Corrections to "Estimating the glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine is better than from cystatin C for evaluating risk factors associated with chronic kidney disease"  Kidney International  Volume 84, Issue 2, (August 2013) DOI: /ki Copyright © 2013 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions

2 Figure 3 The association of chronic kidney disease risk factors with percentage decrease in glomerular filtration rate (↓ GFR) by each method (measured GFR (mGFR), eGFRCr, eGFRCr-CysC, and eGFRCysC). The * identifies P<0.05 for eGFR compared with mGFR using model 1 (generalized estimating equations). Risk factor associations with mGFR were more similar to those with eGFRCr than with eGFRCr-CysC or eGFRCysC. The one exception was 24-h urine creatinine, for which eGFRCysC was more similar to the same association with mGFR. Alb., albumin; BMI, body mass index; Cr, creatinine; CRP, C-reactive protein; CysC, cystatin C; eGFR, estimated GFR. Kidney International  , DOI: ( /ki ) Copyright © 2013 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions


Download ppt "Corrections to "Estimating the glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine is better than from cystatin C for evaluating risk factors associated."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google