Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

ISDS in the EU after Lisbon Treaty and Its Implications to Korea

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "ISDS in the EU after Lisbon Treaty and Its Implications to Korea"— Presentation transcript:

1 ISDS in the EU after Lisbon Treaty and Its Implications to Korea
Sungjin Kang KSIEL – KCAB Joint International Seminar December 19, 2014

2 About the Speaker Sungjin Kang PhD Candidate, Korea University
LLB, Korea University / LLM, University of Michigan Law School Member of New York Bar KSIEL – KCAB Joint International Seminar

3 Outline of the Discussion
Introduction - Inclusion of Investment into Common Commercial Policy Transitional Measures by the EU Review of the Existing BIAs Role Distribution between MS and the EU in an ISD ISD in Recent Trade Agreements (TTIP, CETA) Conclusion - Need for “Investment” Chapter in Korea-EU FTA? KSIEL – KCAB Joint International Seminar

4 Introduction Common Commercial Policy (CCP) of the EU
Exclusive Competence of the EU Basis of the EU’s trade negotiating power, TDI, etc. Did not include “investment” until 2009 Lisbon Treaty – inclusion of investment in the CCP Articles 3 and 207 Lack of clear implementing rules KSIEL – KCAB Joint International Seminar

5 Transitional Measures by the EU
Regulation 1219/2012 on Transitional Arrangements for Bilateral Investment Agreements (BIAs) b/w MS and 3rd counrties There are about 1,400 BIAs between EU MS and 3rd countries “Progressive” incorporation of FDI policy into CCP Need for 1) negotiating principle of new BIAs; and 2) Rules on what to do with the existing BIAs KSIEL – KCAB Joint International Seminar

6 Transitional Measures by the EU
Regulation 1219/2012 on Transitional Arrangements (Cont’d) Existing BIAs continue to bind the MS until the new BIA is executed by the EU and the third country MS must notify their BIAs concluded before Dec. 1, 2009 or the date of accession for review by the Commission Commission review: Consistency of the BIA with the EU law / whether the BIA constitutes “serious obstacles” to the BIA between the EU and the 3rd country Once the MS’ BIA fails the test, the MS and the Commission must enter into consultation KSIEL – KCAB Joint International Seminar

7 Transitional Measures by the EU
Regulation 1219/2012 on Transitional Arrangements (Cont’d) MS can still amend the existing BIAs Must notify to the Commission 5 months before the beginning The Commission must approve, unless: Clash with the EU laws for other reasons than the allocation of competence Commission (COM) decided to start negotiation of a BIA with that 3rd country, or if the COM notified its intention to the EP and the Council It is inconsistent with the EU’s foreign policy objective and principle It constitutes a “serious obstacle” to negotiation / conclusion of a BIA between the MS and the 3rd country. Once approved, the MS must keep the COM informed of the process KSIEL – KCAB Joint International Seminar

8 Transitional Measures by the EU
Regulation 1219/2012 on Transitional Arrangements MS can conclude new BIAs between Dec. 1, 2009 and Jan. 9, 2013, subject to approval by the COM Notification must reach to the COM by Feb. 8, 2013 COM approves them as long as the BIAs do not constitute “serious obstacles” to the BIAs between the EU and the 3rd country If an ISD arises, the MS and the COM must work closely for effective defense KSIEL – KCAB Joint International Seminar

9 Transitional Measures by the EU
Regulation 912/2014 on Distribution of Financial Responsibility linked to ISD between the MS and the EU Key question: Who is responsible if the EU or an MS becomes a respondent in an ISD? Distribution of financial responsibility ISD solely based on MS’ measures: MS ISD based on the EU’s measures or MS’ measures implementing EU’s measures: EU KSIEL – KCAB Joint International Seminar

10 Transitional Measures by the EU
Regulation 912/2014 on Distribution of Financial Responsibility between the MS and the EU in an ISD (Cont’d) Determination of who becomes respondent in an ISD After Consultation between EU and MS, MS normally becomes respondent, except When EU decides to financially responsible When the similar dispute also went to the WTO DSB If the MS informs the COM in writing that it won’t be a respondent Close cooperation between MS and the EU in ISD proceedings KSIEL – KCAB Joint International Seminar

11 ISD in Recent Trade Agreements
Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) The biggest bilateral FTA in history ISDS became a thorny issue Question on regulatory autonomy US and DG Trade in favor, MS objecting Public Consultation of the ISD in the TTIP: Mar – Jul. 2014 Over 150,000 responses Negotiation suspended until the result is fully analyzed KSIEL – KCAB Joint International Seminar

12 ISD in Recent Trade Agreements
Comprehensive Trade and Economic Agreement (CETA) Negotiation completed in September 2014: Pending ratification Likely ratification in late 2015 – early 2016 Major overhaul of ISDS Importance of Bilateral consultation Significantly narrower scope of ISD: Only the following can be invoked Breach of NT Specifically defined breach of FET Breach of requirements for Expropriation Full transparency KSIEL – KCAB Joint International Seminar

13 ISDS in Recent EU Political Situation
New EU Leadership (Nov ~) Donald Tusk, President of the European Council Jean-Claude Juncker President, European Commission Cecilia Malmstrom, Commissioner, Trade KSIEL – KCAB Joint International Seminar

14 ISDS in Recent EU Political Situation
MS defiant against ISDS: Germany, France Are MS happy with the CETA or EUSFTA’s ISDS? Can the Commission persuade the MS? Vattenfall (Swedish investor) v. Germany (II) Germany’s nuclear phase-out brought before the ICSID Disadvantage to German firms (E.On, RWE)? Reinforcing the case against the ISDS? KSIEL – KCAB Joint International Seminar

15 Need for “Investment” Chapter in Korea-EU FTA?
Korea has BITs with 23 EU MS Need to fill the “gap” with MS without BITs EU is likely to negotiate CETA-like provisions with Korea EU-Singapore FTA also provides for similar provisions Adding a chapter in the Korea-EU FTA will be helpful Seamless coverage of investment protection with the EU Ratification: Lobbying to the MS will be crucial KSIEL – KCAB Joint International Seminar

16 Questions and Answers KSIEL – KCAB Joint International Seminar
© ljo / Fotolia (Photo courtesy of European Parliamentary Research Service) KSIEL – KCAB Joint International Seminar


Download ppt "ISDS in the EU after Lisbon Treaty and Its Implications to Korea"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google