1. PART ONE: Assessing Institutional Learning Outcomes
So: we have to do this together.

2. courses and services support institutional outcomes
EFFECTIVE COMMUNICATION. The ability of students to write, read, speak, and listen in order to communicate effectively. Students will be able to:
Comprehend, interpret, and analyze written and oral information;
Express ideas and provide supporting evidence effectively in writing and in speaking;
Express ideas creatively through verbal and non-verbal media (e.g. music, art, dance, etc.)
Communicate effectively in a group or team situation.
ENGL 100 #2: Write text-based expository essays unified by a thesis and by an organizational strategy that reflect the assignment's task and purpose
CHEM 220 #1: Demonstrate an understanding of the basic principles of chemical reactions and reaction processes through explanations and appropriate calculations.
DENT 753 #1: Demonstrate the ability to communicate professionally & effectively with patients and the dental team
ART 206 #4: Describe, interpret and assess their own artwork and that of their peers and professional artists.

3. example: august flex activity (common rubric)
Flex day Fall: Discussion - Effective Communication: What do we have in common? Tailoring a rubric (with faculty from English, Dental Assisting, Chemistry and Business)
End of Fall: Participating faculty grade students using the common rubric; submit results to SLOAC
Beginning Spring: Follow-up discussion: What did faculty get out of the experience? Any ideas for follow-up? (collaborations, tweaks etc.)
criteria for good activity:
👍 offers a fresh perspective on student learning
👍 generates meaningful discussion
👍 connects back to teaching in a practical way
👍 is easy for faculty to participate in
___ helps students reflect on their learning

4. surveys
method: Survey students to see how they rate their proficiency.
what sort of questions should we ask?
who should take the survey?
what are we trying to find out?
what won’t this method tell us?
what discussion or action might arise from the results?

5. embedded / tagged assignments
embed or tag assignments at the course level which gauge student proficiency in an institutional learning outcome.
should we create cross-disciplinary assignments?
… or blueprints for an “ILO”-relevant assignment?
will this create extra work for faculty?
which courses should we target?
what are we trying to find out?
what won’t this method tell us?
what discussion or action might arise from the results?

6. shared rubrics
Use a common rubric, related to a specific ILO, to assess student work in different disciplines.
what’s the best way to develop this rubric?
will this create extra work for faculty?
what are we trying to find out?
what won’t this method tell us?
what discussion or action might arise from the results?

7. student activities / projects
recruit students to participate in an activity, or submit a project or presentation, that reflects their overall grasp of institutional learning outcomes.
what sort of activity? (discussion / portfolio / presentation?)
how do we get students to participate?
how do we get faculty to observe and assess?
what are we trying to find out?
what won’t this method tell us?
what discussion or action might arise from the results?
Student outcome on climate change discussion

8. REFLECTION
(10 minutes)
Focus on one or two of the Institutional Learning Outcomes your course or service supports.
Jot some responses down to the following questions:
Which ILOs matter most to your discipline or service area?
We all want students to apply what they learn with us to their wider academic and personal development. If you could assess students in the ILO-related skills outside your classroom, what would you want to know? (Don’t get too abstract!)