Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

? ? ?. Indications, clinical and laboratory stages of manufacture of pin teeth.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "? ? ?. Indications, clinical and laboratory stages of manufacture of pin teeth."— Presentation transcript:

1 Indications, clinical and laboratory stages of manufacture of pin teeth.

2 ? ? ?

3 How ? Why ?

4 NON - ODONTOGENIC CYST Misdiagnosis resulted in unnecessary endodontic
treatment of four anterior teeth. 4/1972

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14 The Result The Concern

15 Considerations for Anterior Teeth
A metal post is not recommended in anterior teeth which do not require complete coverage restorations. This decision primarily focuses on: [1] the integrity of the remaining tooth structure. [2] the amount of functional load which to anterior teeth are subjected. [3] the morphologic development of anterior teeth.

16 Variation in bite force by location

17

18 The incisal edge of lower anterior teeth
function across the lobes of opposing upper incisors

19

20 Comparative resistance to fracture to shear loading

21 Comparison of fracture stress with varying post types

22 Comparative fracture loads with and without posts

23 Comparative fracture loads with and without posts

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32 Considerations for posterior teeth
Virtually all posterior teeth which have received endodontic therapy are in turn recommended for a cast restoration coronally. In turn if a coronal buildup is deemed necessary {core} for retention of the cast restoration, then further the decision for the need of a post must be determined. The prevailing considerations for posterior teeth: [1] greater functional loading of posterior teeth. [2] morphologic disposition of posterior teeth to splitting.

33

34 Fusion of buccal and lingual lobes

35

36

37

38

39

40 Hazards of treatment at a S.D.M.

41 Intra-radicular build up without post for molar teeth

42

43

44

45

46

47 Design Considerations for Posts

48 Post - endodontic internal build up
Direct restorative with or without prefabricated post in canal Custom cast post with core fabricated either directly or indirectly or

49 Design considerations for posts
Diameter retain as much dentin as possible in the roots of all teeth; increasing the diameter of the post has a minimally significant effect on the increase in retention.

50 Effect of Dowel Design and Diameter
On Retention Zinc Phosphate 8 mm length Force in Kg

51 Design Considerations for Posts
Taper vs. Parallel parallel sided design has repeatedly been shown to create significantly less concentration of stress at its tip than a tapered design parallel sided design has in various reports has been show to provide retention of 1.9 X, 3.3 X, 4.5 X greater than tapered design in situations where a tapered design is used, it is critical to provide a flat root interface on which the core will seat

52 Force in Kg

53 Design Considerations for Posts
Length equal to the length of the clinical crown equal to 3/4 of the root length equal to 1/2 the length of the canal equal to 1/2 the length of the root in bone maintaining 4 mm. of endodontic filling material at the apex of the root

54 Design Considerations for Posts
Length equal to the length of the clinical crown maintaining 4 mm. of endodontic filling material at the apex of the root

55 Design Considerations for Posts
Surface Configuration Fluted or irregular surface configurations because of their increased mechanical retention when cemented within the root are deemed most appropriate. Adhesively bonded posts are not influenced by surface configuration. Active engagement of the root with threaded surface configurations have been shown to be the most retentive but also the most predictive of root fracture; therefore the recommendation for post placement into the root irrespective of surface configuration is a “passive design”.

56 A B C D Passive Active

57 Additional design considerations for posts
Resistance form the irregular shape of a canal particularly with a cast post/ core provides useful circumferential irregularity for an anti- rotational effect; in situations where this is not present and there is minimal remaining coronal dentin, it is advisable to prepare a keyway at the orifice of the canal or include supplemental pins for an anti- rotational effect.

58

59 Luting Materials for Posts
Zinc phosphate - { Fleck’s, Tenacin } Glass Ionomer - { Fuji I, Fuji plus, Ketac-Cem } Polycarboxylate - { Livcarbo, Durelon, Hy-Bond } Adhesive resin - { All- Bond, C& B Metabond, Variolink II, Panavia }

60 Effect of luting agent on retention

61 Effect of luting agent on retention

62 Manipulation of cement during post placement

63 Manipulation of cement during post placement

64

65 Additional Design Considerations with Posts
Ferrule effect The principle of extending the crown margin apical to the ‘tooth stump - core interface’ at least 1.5 mm. to circumferentially encompass the tooth. This reduces the fracture potential of the post within the root when the crown is in function.

66

67

68

69 Fracture Comparison of Post Designs with and without Ferrule

70

71

72

73

74

75

76

77 Customized Cast Post and Core
Direct pattern fabrication Indirect pattern fabrication

78 Materials/Designs/Shapes
Fiber reinforced Zirconium Stainless steel Titanium Design Active Passive Hybrid Shape Parallel Tapered Multi-stage

79 Fiber reinforced Enhanced aesthetics Excellent biocompatibility
No galvanic corrosion signs Mechanical properties similar to dentin Easy to use and remove Firm retention - adhesive bonding Lower radiopacity than metal post

80 Stainless Steel Good mechanical properties
Problematic esthetics at times Potential corrosion and embedding of decomposition products Potential damage to remaining structure Cemented using zinc phosphate, glass ionomer, or polycarboxylate cement.

81 Titanium Good mechanical properties Excellent biocompatibility
Questionable aesthetics at times Potential damage to remaining structure Cemented with zinc phosphate, glass ionomer,or polycarboxylate cement

82 Metal v. Fiber Reinforced
Coronal impact is transmitted to remaining tooth Fiber reinforced Coronal impact is dispersed through the post alleviating force on remaining tooth              

83 Active Threads to engage the dentin
Provides the greatest retention method Risk that engagement may lead to fractures Material is metal

84 Passive Smaller diameter than drill diameter
No risk of engaging dentinal walls Slightly more material must be removed than metal post Adhesive bonding increases retention

85 Hybrid Active at coronal end and passive at apical area
          Active at coronal end and passive at apical area Used where some mechanical retention is demanded Material is always metal Active Passive

86 Parallel Same width from coronal to apical area
Greater retention /given length Requires removal of more tooth structure at apical end of post than tapered design

87 Tapered Narrower at apical than coronal area
Designed to adapt to constriction of root dentin Requires less dentin removal in apical extent

88 Multi Stage Mainly made in metal designs
Larger at coronal area and narrower at apical area More technique sensitive Requires multiple drills

89 Fiber Reinforced Posts

90

91

92

93

94 FRC Postec System

95 Features Benefits Metal-free post with a high degree of translucency
Esthetic properties compatible with all-ceramic restorations Longitudinal placed glass fibers Provides light transmittance & translucency Modulus of elasticity similar to dentin Minimizes stress concentrations within root structure ? Passive, tapered design Provides an excellent fit and saves remaining tooth structure at apical extent ? Two post sizes with color coded matching reamers Applied to virtually all teeth except those with extremely small diameter roots Adhesively bonded Excellent retention properties Integrated system Coordinated materials for a total adhesive build-up technique Retrievable Possibility for endodontic re-treatment

96 Radiopacity FRC Postec shows reduced radiopacity
Used in conjunction with Variolink II provides additional x-ray identification

97 Comparative X-rays FRC Postec ParaPost Fiber White FiberKor Luscent Anchor Ivoclar Vivadent Coltene Whaledent Pentron Dentatus

98 Removal FRC Postec can be removed with a rotary instrument if retreatment is required

99 Post space preparation
Is it necessary ? Which canal(s) ? What size and length ? What material ?

100 Post Space Preparation
4 mm Length of Clinical Crown

101 Conditioning of the Post Space
Try in the post Rinse the canal With NaOCl or H2O2 Dry canal with paper points

102 Conditioning of the Post Space
Etch canal and coronal dentin with phosphoric acid Rinse all residue of etching gel Dry canal with paper points 15s

103 Conditioning of the Post Space
Apply dual cure bonding agent Remove excess With paper points Rinse post with alcohol and dry 10s

104 Conditioning of the Post
Place the post and fully seat it Remove excess Mix Variolink II Base and Catalyst Coat the cement on FRC Postec

105 Conditioning of the Post
Condition post surface 60 sec with silane Dispense luting resin Air dry post 60s

106 Coating and placement of the Post
Mix equal lengths of base and catalyst for 20 sec Coat the post with resin cement Passively seat the post and remove excess above canal orifice

107 Direct Core Build-up Build up core with direct composite in increments
Light cure for 60 sec Prepare tooth for crown 60s 40s


Download ppt "? ? ?. Indications, clinical and laboratory stages of manufacture of pin teeth."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google