1. Comparison of three scores to screen for delirium in the recovery room
F.M. Radtke, M. Franck, M. Schneider, A. Luetz, M. Seeling, A. Heinz, K.D. Wernecke, C.D. Spies 
British Journal of Anaesthesia 
Volume 101, Issue 3, Pages (September 2008)
DOI: /bja/aen193
Copyright © 2008 British Journal of Anaesthesia Terms and Conditions

2. Fig 1
Diagnostic test performance of CAM, DDS, and Nu-DESC was evaluated by ROC analysis using DSM-IV criteria as gold standard and including comparisons of the corresponding ROC curves. The calculated cut-off points were: 1 for the Nu-DESC (corresponding to the published value >1) and 1 for the DDS (recommended cut-off point is >7). The cut-off point for the CAM could not be calculated due to its non-ordinal structure; it has been plotted to graphically display sensitivity and specificity as a binary classifier.
British Journal of Anaesthesia  , DOI: ( /bja/aen193)
Copyright © 2008 British Journal of Anaesthesia Terms and Conditions