1. Paper 3 Option 31: Weimar and Nazi Germany 1918-1939
Question
Marks
Timings
Question type 1
4 marks
6 mins
Give two things you can infer from Source _ about… 2
12 marks
16 mins
Explain why… 3a
8 marks
12 mins
How useful are Source _ and _ for… 3b
What is the main difference between these views (interpretations) 3c
Suggest one reason why interpretations _ and _ give different views on… 3d
16 marks
+ 4 SPAG
30 mins
How far do you agree with interpretation _ about…use both interpretations and your own knowledge…

2. QUESTION 1 (4 MARKS -6 mins) QUESTION 3A (8 MARKS – 12mins )
[POINT] One thing I can infer from Source _ about… is…
[EVIDENCE] Evidence to support this is…(insert quote/description)
QUESTION 2 (12 MARKS – 18mins )
[POINT] One reason why…(WFTQ)…is…
[EVIDENCE] Evidence to support this is…
[EXPLAIN] This meant that….because…
Therefore…
[POINT] The final reason why…(WFTQ)…is…
[CONCLUSION In conclusion … was caused by…. because….
QUESTION 3A (8 MARKS – 12mins )
 [POINT] Source X is useful for …(WFTQ) … because it tells me…
[EVIDENCE] Evidence to support this (quote/description of sources)…/However it fails to tell me…
[OWN KNOWLEDGE] This agrees with my own knowledge because I know…
[RELIABILITY] Source ­_ reliable/unreliable for …(WFTQ)…because (N.O.P). The provenance affects the usefulness of the source because…
 [POINT] Source Y useful for …(WFTQ) … because it tells me…

3. These three questions are based on two interpretations:
QUESTION 3D
Do you agree with the interpretation X about “_____________” (16 MARKS + 4 SPAG – 24mins)
[POINT] I agree with interpretation X about ….WFTQ… because it argues………………….. .
[EVIDENCE] Evidence to support this is……..(quote from the source)….
[FOCUS] The interpretation has focused on…
[OWN KNOWLEDGE] This supports/refutes my own knowledge because I know…
[LINK] Therefore…
[POINT] Furthermore, I agree with interpretation X about ….WFTQ… because it argues…………… .
[POINT] In contrast with interpretation X, interpretation Y argues….
Optional extras:
[POINT] Interpretation X and Y agree that…..
[EVIDENCE] Evidence to support this is they both…
[POINT] I disagree with both of the interpretations about….WFTQ)….
[OWN KNOWLEDGE] I
[LINK] Therefore I disagree that the
[CONCLUSION] In conclusion, using my own knowledge I dis/agree with interpretation X because…
QUESTION 3B (4 MARKS - 6 mins)
[POINT] The main difference between the two interpretations of (WFTQ) is…
[EVIDENCE] Evidence from interpretation _ to support this is…
Evidence from interpretation _ to support this is…
[EXPLAIN] This shows that the interpretations differ because….
QUESTION 3C (4 MARKS - 6 mins
[POINT] One reason why the two interpretations give different views on (WFTQ) is…
[EVIDENCE] Evidence from interpretation _ to support this is…
Evidence from interpretation _ to support this is…
[EXPLAIN] This means that the interpretations would have different views on (WFTQ) because…

4. This is an alternative writing frame for question 3A
This is an alternative writing frame for question 3A. It may be clearer and simpler:
[CONTENT] Source A is accurate because it says…. [OWN KNOWLEDGE] I know from my own knowledge…. [CONTENT] Source B is more accurate because says… [RELIABILITY] Source A is less reliable because it is (NOP)… This means that it is more/less useful for….WFTQ… [RELIABILITY] Source B is more reliable because it is (NOP)…

5. Question 1: Give two things you can infer from Source _ about… (4 marks)
[POINT] One thing I can infer from Source _ about… is… [EVIDENCE] Evidence to support this is…(insert quote/description)

6. Question 2: Explain why… (12 marks)
[POINT] One reason why…(WFTQ) is…
[EVIDENCE] Evidence to support this is…
[EXPLAIN] This meant that…
[LINK] Therefore, this links to… because…
[POINT] Another reason why…(WFTQ) is…
[POINT] A final reason why…(WFTQ) is…
[CONCLUSION] In conclusion the most important reason why (WFTQ) … was because…

7. Explain why…
The German people were opposed to the Treaty of Versailles. The German constitution caused political problems. People from the left and right wing wanted to end the Weimar Republic was a year of crisis for Germany The German economy improved under Stresemann The German international status improved under Stresemann The Nazi party tried to launch a putsch in 1923 The failure of the Munich Putsch helped the Nazis in the long term The support for the Nazis grew from 1929 – 1932 The Weimar Republic collapsed from 1929 – 1933 Hindenburg appointed Hitler as Chancellor on 30th January 1933 Hitler purged the SA in the Night of the Long Knives The Reichstag Fire helped Hitler consolidate control over Germany The Nazi created a police state Set up concentration camps in 1933 The Nazis used propaganda and censorship The Nazis created Youth Groups Some young people opposed the Nazis There was opposition from the Churches The Nazis wanted to control the lives of women The Nazis persecuted the Jews The Nazis persecuted other social groups.

8. Question 1: What can you infer… (4 marks)
Level
Mark
Descriptor
Result 1
Simple statement(s)
One simple inference = 1 mark
Two simple inferences = 2 marks 2
Statements with evidence
One inference supported by evidence = 2 marks
Two inference supported by evidence = 4 marks
WWW:
[ ] You made a simple inference.
[ ] You made two simple inference.
[ ] You made an inference and supported it with evidence from the Source
[ ] You made two inference and supported it with evidence from the Source
EBI:
To improve I must…
Question 1: What can you infer… (4 marks)
Level
Mark
Descriptor
Result 1
Simple statement(s)
One simple inference = 1 mark
Two simple inferences = 2 marks 2
Statements with evidence
One inference supported by evidence = 2 marks
Two inference supported by evidence = 4 marks
WWW:
[ ] You made a simple inference.
[ ] You made two simple inference.
[ ] You made an inference and supported it with evidence from the Source
[ ] You made two inference and supported it with evidence from the Source
EBI:
To improve I must…

9. Result Result Question 2: (12 marks) Explain why… Level Marks
Description
Result
Level 1
1-3
A simple or generalised answer is given, lacking development and organisation.
Level 2
4-6
Simple explanation, with limited analysis and focus on the question. Some development and organisation of material shown, but a line of reasoning is not sustained. Accurate and relevant information is included
Maximum 5 marks for answers that do not include an aspect in addition to those prompted by the stimulus material.
Level 3
7-9
An explanation is given, showing some analysis, which is mainly directed at the question. Line of reasoning is generally sustained, although some passages may lack coherence and organisation. Accurate and relevant information is included Maximum 8 marks for answers that do not include an aspect in addition to those prompted by the stimulus material.
Level 4
10-12
An analytical explanation is given which is directed consistently at the question, showing a line of reasoning that is coherent, sustained and logically structured. Accurate and relevant information is precisely showing wide-ranging knowledge and understanding of the required features or characteristics of the period studied.
No access to Level 4 for answers which do not include an aspect in addition to those prompted by the stimulus material.
WWW:
[ ] Simple statements
[ ] Simple explanation with relevant information
[ ] Developed explanation with accurate and relevant information
[ ] Sustained explanation with precise and wide-ranging own knowledge
To improve I must….
Question 2: (12 marks) Explain why…
Level
Marks
Description
Result
Level 1
1-3
A simple or generalised answer is given, lacking development and organisation.
Level 2
4-6
Simple explanation, with limited analysis and focus on the question. Some development and organisation of material shown, but a line of reasoning is not sustained. Accurate and relevant information is included
Maximum 5 marks for answers that do not include an aspect in addition to those prompted by the stimulus material.
Level 3
7-9
An explanation is given, showing some analysis, which is mainly directed at the question. Line of reasoning is generally sustained, although some passages may lack coherence and organisation. Accurate and relevant information is included Maximum 8 marks for answers that do not include an aspect in addition to those prompted by the stimulus material.
Level 4
10-12
An analytical explanation is given which is directed consistently at the question, showing a line of reasoning that is coherent, sustained and logically structured. Accurate and relevant information is precisely showing wide-ranging knowledge and understanding of the required features or characteristics of the period studied.
No access to Level 4 for answers which do not include an aspect in addition to those prompted by the stimulus material.
WWW:
[ ] Simple statements
[ ] Simple explanation with relevant information
[ ] Developed explanation with accurate and relevant information
[ ] Sustained explanation with precise and wide-ranging own knowledge
To improve I must….

10. Question 2: (12 marks) Explain why…
Level
Marks
Description
Result
Level 1
1-3
A simple or generalised answer is given, lacking development and organisation.
Level 2
4-6
Simple explanation, with limited analysis and focus on the question. Some development and organisation of material shown, but a line of reasoning is not sustained. Accurate and relevant information is included
Maximum 5 marks for answers that do not include an aspect in addition to those prompted by the stimulus material.
Level 3
7-9
An explanation is given, showing some analysis, which is mainly directed at the question. Line of reasoning is generally sustained, although some passages may lack coherence and organisation. Accurate and relevant information is included Maximum 8 marks for answers that do not include an aspect in addition to those prompted by the stimulus material.
Level 4
10-12
An analytical explanation is given which is directed consistently at the question, showing a line of reasoning that is coherent, sustained and logically structured. Accurate and relevant information is precisely showing wide-ranging knowledge and understanding of the required features or characteristics of the period studied.
No access to Level 4 for answers which do not include an aspect in addition to those prompted by the stimulus material.

11. Level 1
1-3
A simple or generalised answer is given, lacking development and organisation.
Level 2
4-6
Simple explanation, with limited analysis and focus on the question. Some development and organisation of material shown, but a line of reasoning is not sustained. Accurate and relevant information is included
Maximum 5 marks for answers that do not include an aspect in addition to those prompted by the stimulus material.
Level 3
7-9
An explanation is given, showing some analysis, which is mainly directed at the question. Line of reasoning is generally sustained, although some passages may lack coherence and organisation. Accurate and relevant information is included Maximum 8 marks for answers that do not include an aspect in addition to those prompted by the stimulus material.
Level 4
10-12
An analytical explanation is given which is directed consistently at the question, showing a line of reasoning that is coherent, sustained and logically structured. Accurate and relevant information is precisely showing wide-ranging knowledge and understanding of the required features or characteristics of the period studied.
No access to Level 4 for answers which do not include an aspect in addition to those prompted by the stimulus material.

12. Question 3a: How useful are Source _ and _ for… (8 marks)
QUESTION 3A (8 MARKS – 12mins )
 [POINT] Source X is useful for …(WFTQ) … because it tells me…
[EVIDENCE] Evidence to support this (quote/description of sources)…/However it fails to tell me…
[OWN KNOWLEDGE] This agrees with my own knowledge because I know…
[RELIABILITY] Source ­_ reliable/unreliable for …(WFTQ)…because (N.O.P). The provenance affects the usefulness of the source because…
 [POINT] Source Y useful for …(WFTQ) … because it tells me…

13. Question 3a: (8 Mark) How useful are sources for… questions Mark
Description
What did I get?
Level 1
1-2
A simple judgement on utility is given, and supported by undeveloped comment on the content of the sources and/or their provenance1. Simple comprehension of the source material is shown by the extraction or paraphrase of some content. Limited contextual knowledge is deployed with links to the sources.
Level 2
3-5
Judgements on source utility for the specified enquiry are given, using valid criteria. Judgements are supported by developed comment related to the content of the sources and/or their provenance1. Comprehension and some analysis of the sources is shown by the selection and use of material to support comments on their utility. Contextual knowledge is used directly to support
comments on the usefulness of the content of the sources and/or their provenance.
Level 3
6-8
Judgements on source utility for the specified enquiry are given, applying valid criteria with developed reasoning which takes into account how the Provenance affects the usefulness of the source content. The sources are analysed to support reasoning about their utility. Contextual knowledge is used in the process of interpreting the sources and applying criteria for judgements on their utility.
WWW:
[ ] I made simple statement about the source
[ ] I made simple statements using evidence from the source.
[ ] I made simple statements using the source and my OK.
[ ] I made developed statements using the source, my own knowledge and mentioned reliability (context/NOP)
[ ] I made developed statements using BOTH sources, precise own knowledge and mentioned reliability (context AND NOP)
[ ] I have reached an overall judgement on the reliability of the sources in regards to the question
To improve I must…
Question 3a: (8 Mark) How useful are sources for… questions
 Mark
Description
What did I get?
Level 1
1-2
A simple judgement on utility is given, and supported by undeveloped comment on the content of the sources and/or their provenance1. Simple comprehension of the source material is shown by the extraction or paraphrase of some content. Limited contextual knowledge is deployed with links to the sources.
Level 2
3-5
Judgements on source utility for the specified enquiry are given, using valid criteria. Judgements are supported by developed comment related to the content of the sources and/or their provenance1. Comprehension and some analysis of the sources is shown by the selection and use of material to support comments on their utility. Contextual knowledge is used directly to support
comments on the usefulness of the content of the sources and/or their provenance.
Level 3
6-8
Judgements on source utility for the specified enquiry are given, applying valid criteria with developed reasoning which takes into account how the Provenance affects the usefulness of the source content. The sources are analysed to support reasoning about their utility. Contextual knowledge is used in the process of interpreting the sources and applying criteria for judgements on their utility.
WWW:
[ ] I made simple statement about the source
[ ] I made simple statements using evidence from the source.
[ ] I made simple statements using the source and my OK.
[ ] I made developed statements using the source, my own knowledge and mentioned reliability (context/NOP)
[ ] I made developed statements using BOTH sources, precise own knowledge and mentioned reliability (context AND NOP)
[ ] I have reached an overall judgement on the reliability of the sources in regards to the question
To improve I must…

14. comment on the content of the sources and/or their provenance1. Simple
1 1–2 • A simple judgement on utility is given, and supported by undeveloped
comment on the content of the sources and/or their provenance1. Simple
comprehension of the source material is shown by the extraction or paraphrase
of some content. Limited contextual knowledge is deployed with links to the
sources.
2 3–5 • 3 6–8 •
1 1–2 • A simple judgement on utility is given, and supported by undeveloped
comment on the content of the sources and/or their provenance1. Simple
comprehension of the source material is shown by the extraction or paraphrase
of some content. Limited contextual knowledge is deployed with links to the
sources.
2 3–5 • Judgements on source utility for the specified enquiry are given, using valid
criteria. Judgements are supported by developed comment related to the
content of the sources and/or their provenance1. Comprehension and some
analysis of the sources is shown by the selection and use of material to support
comments on their utility. Contextual knowledge is used directly to support
comments on the usefulness of the content of the sources and/or their
provenance.
3 6–8 • Judgements on source utility for the specified enquiry are given, applying valid
criteria with developed reasoning which takes into account how the
provenance1 affects the usefulness of the source content. The sources are
analysed to support reasoning about their utility. Contextual knowledge is used
in the process of interpreting the sources and applying criteria for judgements
on their utility.
Notes

15. Question 3a: (8 Mark) How useful are sources for… questions
Description
What did I get?
Level 1
1-2
A simple judgement on utility is given, and supported by undeveloped comment on the content of the sources and/or their provenance
Level 2
3-5
Judgements on source utility for the specified enquiry are given using valid criteria. Judgements are supported by developed comment related to the content of the sources and/or their provenance.
Level 3
6-8
Judgements on source utility for the specified enquiry are given, applying valid criteria with developed reasoning which takes into account how the provenance affects the usefulness of the source content.
WWW:
EBI:
Question 3a: (8 Mark) How useful are sources for… questions
 Mark
Description
What did I get?
Level 1
1-2
A simple judgement on utility is given, and supported by undeveloped comment on the content of the sources and/or their provenance
Level 2
3-5
Judgements on source utility for the specified enquiry are given using valid criteria. Judgements are supported by developed comment related to the content of the sources and/or their provenance.
Level 3
6-8
Judgements on source utility for the specified enquiry are given, applying valid criteria with developed reasoning which takes into account how the provenance affects the usefulness of the source content.
WWW:
EBI:

16. Question 3b: What is the main difference between these views (interpretations) (4 marks)
[POINT] The main difference between the two interpretations of (WFTQ) is… [EVIDENCE] Evidence from interpretation _ to support this is… Evidence from interpretation _ to support this is… [EXPLAIN] This shows that the interpretations differ because….

17. Question 3b: What is the main difference… (4 marks)
Level
Mark
Descriptor
Result L1
1-2
Limited analysis of the interpretations is shown by the extraction or paraphrase of some content, but differences of surface detail only are given, or a difference of view is asserted without direct support. L2
3-4
The interpretations are analysed and a key difference of view is identified and supported from them.
WWW:
[ ] You have paraphrased the interpretation
[ ] You have identified a difference without strong support
[ ] You have identified a difference and used precise evidence from the interpretation to support your answer
EBI:
To improve I must…
Question 3b: What is the main difference… (4 marks)
Level
Mark
Descriptor
Result L1
1-2
Limited analysis of the interpretations is shown by the extraction or paraphrase of some content, but differences of surface detail only are given, or a difference of view is asserted without direct support. L2
3-4
The interpretations are analysed and a key difference of view is identified and supported from them.
WWW:
[ ] You have paraphrased the interpretation
[ ] You have identified a difference without strong support
[ ] You have identified a difference and used precise evidence from the interpretation to support your answer
EBI:
To improve I must…

18. Question 3c: Suggest one reason why interpretations _ and _ give different views on… (4 marks)
[POINT] One reason why the two interpretations give different views on (WFTQ) is… [EVIDENCE] Evidence from interpretation _ to support this is… Evidence from interpretation _ to support this is… [EXPLAIN] This means that the interpretations would have different views on (WFTQ) because…

19. Question 3c: Suggest one reason why… (4 marks)
Level
Mark
Descriptor
Result L1
1-2
A simple valid explanation is offered but displaying only limited analysis. Support for the explanation is based on simple undeveloped comment or on the selection of details from the provided material or own knowledge, with only implied linkage to the explanation.. L2
3-4
An explanation of a reason for difference is given, analysing the interpretations. The explanation is substantiated effectively.
WWW:
[ ] You wrote a simple statement about the interpretation
[ ] You have identified one reason without strong support
[ ] You have identified a reason and used precise evidence from the interpretations to explain your answer
EBI:
To improve I must…
Question 3c: Suggest one reason why… (4 marks)
Level
Mark
Descriptor
Result L1
1-2
A simple valid explanation is offered but displaying only limited analysis. Support for the explanation is based on simple undeveloped comment or on the selection of details from the provided material or own knowledge, with only implied linkage to the explanation.. L2
3-4
An explanation of a reason for difference is given, analysing the interpretations. The explanation is substantiated effectively.
WWW:
[ ] You wrote a simple statement about the interpretation
[ ] You have identified one reason without strong support
[ ] You have identified a reason and used precise evidence from the interpretations to explain your answer
EBI:
To improve I must…

20. Question 3d: How far do you agree with interpretation _ about… (16 marks + 4 SPaG)
Do you agree with the interpretation X about “_____________”
QUESTION 3D (16 MARKS + 4 SPAG – 24mins)
[POINT] I agree with interpretation X about ….WFTQ… because it argues………………….. .
[EVIDENCE] Evidence to support this is……..(quote from the source)….
[FOCUS] The interpretation has focused on…
[OWN KNOWLEDGE] This supports/refutes my own knowledge because I know…
[LINK] Therefore…
[POINT] Furthermore, I agree with interpretation X about ….WFTQ… because it argues…………… .
[POINT] In contrast with interpretation X, interpretation Y argues….
Optional extras:
[POINT] Interpretation X and Y agree that…..
[EVIDENCE] Evidence to support this is they both…
[POINT] I disagree with both of the interpretations about….WFTQ)….
[OWN KNOWLEDGE] I
[LINK] Therefore I disagree that the
[CONCLUSION] In conclusion, using my own knowledge I dis/agree with interpretation X because…

21. (d) How far do you agree with Interpretation 2 about reasons for the growth in support for the Nazi Party in the years 1929–32?
Explain your answer, using both interpretations and your knowledge of the
historical context. (20)
I mostly agree with Interpretation 2 about the reasons for the growth in the support for the Nazi Party in the years 1929 – The interpretation focuses on the wider economic and social reasons for the growth in the Nazi party, the Wall Street Crash and subsequent unemployment. According to the interpretation these reasons ‘played a much larger role than any actions of the Nazi leader himself in bringing Hitler to power. I would agree with this because it was during the Depression that the Nazis became the largest party in the Reichstag with 230 seats in the July 1932 election.
I agree with this interpretation because it shows that the Nazi party was a ‘small party with little support’. This is true. In 1928 the Nazis only took 2.8% of the vote. However they became much more popular when the economy crashed. It was this economic crisis that made the Nazi messages appealing to the German people. For example the offer of ‘Work and Bread’.
In contrast to Interpretation 2, Interpretation 1 focuses on the role of Hitler and Goebbels in persuading the German people to support the Nazis. The interpretation focuses on his ‘charismatic leadership’ and his ability to give ‘hope’ to the Germans. It focuses on Goebbels's use of propaganda targeting ‘the specific grievances of the Germans.’
I therefore do agree with interpretation 1 that Hitler’s oratory and Goebbels propaganda gained the support of the German people. The Nazis were experts in propaganda and used modern technology to spread their message effectively. Hitler was the first politician ever to use an aeroplane to travel to different German cities to campaign for support. However these reasons were ultimately only effective because of the Depression.
Therefore I would agree more with Interpretation 2 about the reasons for the growth in support of the Nazi party in the Year 1939 – 1932 as the Depression was the catalyst that made Hitler and Goebbels's message appealing to the German people, increasing their support for the Nazi Party.

22. Question 3d: (16 marks + 4 SPAG) How far do you agree? Level
Description
Result L1
1-4
Answer offers simple valid comment to agree with or counter the interpretation. Limited analysis of one interpretation is shown by selection and inclusion of some detail in the form of simple paraphrase or direct quotation. Generalised contextual knowledge is included and linked to the evaluation. L2
5-8
Answer offers valid evaluative comment to agree with or counter the interpretation. Some analysis is shown in selecting and including details from both interpretations to support this comment. Some relevant contextual knowledge is included and linked to the evaluation. An overall judgement is given but its justification is insecure or undeveloped and a line of reasoning is not sustained. L3
9-12
 Answer provides an explained evaluation, agreeing or disagreeing with the interpretation. Good analysis of the interpretations is shown indicating difference of view and deploying this to support the evaluation. Relevant contextual knowledge is used directly to support the evaluation. An overall judgement is given with some justification and a line of reasoning is generally sustained. L4
13-16
Answer provides an explained evaluation reviewing the alternative views in coming to a substantiated judgement. Precise analysis of the interpretations is shown, indicating how the differences of view are conveyed and deploying this material to support the evaluation. Relevant contextual knowledge is precisely selected to support the evaluation. An overall judgment is justified and the line of reasoning is coherent, sustained and logically structured.
SPAG
1-2 SPAG is poor and hinders understanding
3-4 SPAG is accurate
WWW:
[ ] You wrote a simple statement agreeing or disagreeing with the interpretation.
[ ] Your argument is one sided with relevant contextual knowledge.
[ ] You have a balanced argument with accurate contextual knowledge and have reached a judgement
[ ] You have a balanced argument with precise details used from the interpretations and have used accurate contextual knowledge and have reached a strong overall judgement
EBI:
To improve I must….
Question 3d: (16 marks + 4 SPAG) How far do you agree?
Level
Description
Result L1
1-4
Answer offers simple valid comment to agree with or counter the interpretation. Limited analysis of one interpretation is shown by selection and inclusion of some detail in the form of simple paraphrase or direct quotation. Generalised contextual knowledge is included and linked to the evaluation. L2
5-8
Answer offers valid evaluative comment to agree with or counter the interpretation. Some analysis is shown in selecting and including details from both interpretations to support this comment. Some relevant contextual knowledge is included and linked to the evaluation. An overall judgement is given but its justification is insecure or undeveloped and a line of reasoning is not sustained. L3
9-12
 Answer provides an explained evaluation, agreeing or disagreeing with the interpretation. Good analysis of the interpretations is shown indicating difference of view and deploying this to support the evaluation. Relevant contextual knowledge is used directly to support the evaluation. An overall judgement is given with some justification and a line of reasoning is generally sustained. L4
13-16
Answer provides an explained evaluation reviewing the alternative views in coming to a substantiated judgement. Precise analysis of the interpretations is shown, indicating how the differences of view are conveyed and deploying this material to support the evaluation. Relevant contextual knowledge is precisely selected to support the evaluation. An overall judgment is justified and the line of reasoning is coherent, sustained and logically structured.
SPAG
1-2 SPAG is poor and hinders understanding
3-4 SPAG is accurate
WWW:
[ ] You wrote a simple statement agreeing or disagreeing with the interpretation.
[ ] Your argument is one sided with relevant contextual knowledge.
[ ] You have a balanced argument with accurate contextual knowledge and have reached a judgement
[ ] You have a balanced argument with precise details used from the interpretations and have used accurate contextual knowledge and have reached a strong overall judgement
EBI:
To improve I must….

23. Question 3d: (16 marks + 4 SPAG) How far do you agree? Level
Description
Result L1
1-4
Answer offers simple valid comment to agree with or counter the interpretation. Limited analysis of one interpretation is shown by selection and inclusion of some detail in the form of simple paraphrase or direct quotation. Generalised contextual knowledge is included and linked to the evaluation. L2
5-8
Answer offers valid evaluative comment to agree with or counter the interpretation. Some analysis is shown in selecting and including details from both interpretations to support this comment. Some relevant contextual knowledge is included and linked to the evaluation. An overall judgement is given but its justification is insecure or undeveloped and a line of reasoning is not sustained. L3
9-12
 Answer provides an explained evaluation, agreeing or disagreeing with the interpretation. Good analysis of the interpretations is shown indicating difference of view and deploying this to support the evaluation. Relevant contextual knowledge is used directly to support the evaluation. An overall judgement is given with some justification and a line of reasoning is generally sustained. L4
13-16
Answer provides an explained evaluation reviewing the alternative views in coming to a substantiated judgement. Precise analysis of the interpretations is shown, indicating how the differences of view are conveyed and deploying this material to support the evaluation. Relevant contextual knowledge is precisely selected to support the evaluation. An overall judgment is justified and the line of reasoning is coherent, sustained and logically structured.
SPAG
1-2 SPAG is poor and hinders understanding
3-4 SPAG is accurate
WWW:
[ ] You agreed or disagreed with the interpretation
[ ] You used the interpretations
[ ] You explained the different views in the interpretations
[ ] You used your Ok to support or refute the interpretations
[ ] You showed how the differences of view are conveyed
[ ] You reached an overall judgement
[ ] You wrote coherently
[ ] Your answer was well organised
To improve I must….
Question 3d: (16 marks + 4 SPAG) How far do you agree?
Level
Description
Result L1
1-4
Answer offers simple valid comment to agree with or counter the interpretation. Limited analysis of one interpretation is shown by selection and inclusion of some detail in the form of simple paraphrase or direct quotation. Generalised contextual knowledge is included and linked to the evaluation. L2
5-8
Answer offers valid evaluative comment to agree with or counter the interpretation. Some analysis is shown in selecting and including details from both interpretations to support this comment. Some relevant contextual knowledge is included and linked to the evaluation. An overall judgement is given but its justification is insecure or undeveloped and a line of reasoning is not sustained. L3
9-12
 Answer provides an explained evaluation, agreeing or disagreeing with the interpretation. Good analysis of the interpretations is shown indicating difference of view and deploying this to support the evaluation. Relevant contextual knowledge is used directly to support the evaluation. An overall judgement is given with some justification and a line of reasoning is generally sustained. L4
13-16
Answer provides an explained evaluation reviewing the alternative views in coming to a substantiated judgement. Precise analysis of the interpretations is shown, indicating how the differences of view are conveyed and deploying this material to support the evaluation. Relevant contextual knowledge is precisely selected to support the evaluation. An overall judgment is justified and the line of reasoning is coherent, sustained and logically structured.
SPAG
1-2 SPAG is poor and hinders understanding
3-4 SPAG is accurate
WWW:
[ ] You agreed or disagreed with the interpretation
[ ] You used the interpretations
[ ] You explained the different views in the interpretations
[ ] You used your Ok to support or refute the interpretations
[ ] You showed how the differences of view are conveyed
[ ] You reached an overall judgement
[ ] You wrote coherently
[ ] Your answer was well organised
To improve I must….

24. Question 3d: (16 marks + 4 SPAG) How far do you agree?
Level
Description
Result L1
1-4
Answer offers simple valid comment to agree with or counter the interpretation. Limited analysis of one interpretation is shown by selection and inclusion of some detail in the form of simple paraphrase or direct quotation. Generalised contextual knowledge is included and linked to the evaluation. L2
5-8
Answer offers valid evaluative comment to agree with or counter the interpretation. Some analysis is shown in selecting and including details from both interpretations to support this comment. Some relevant contextual knowledge is included and linked to the evaluation. An overall judgement is given but its justification is insecure or undeveloped and a line of reasoning is not sustained. L3
9-12
 Answer provides an explained evaluation, agreeing or disagreeing with the interpretation. Good analysis of the interpretations is shown indicating difference of view and deploying this to support the evaluation. Relevant contextual knowledge is used directly to support the evaluation. An overall judgement is given with some justification and a line of reasoning is generally sustained. L4
13-16
Answer provides an explained evaluation reviewing the alternative views in coming to a substantiated judgement. Precise analysis of the interpretations is shown, indicating how the differences of view are conveyed and deploying this material to support the evaluation. Relevant contextual knowledge is precisely selected to support the evaluation. An overall judgment is justified and the line of reasoning is coherent, sustained and logically structured.
SPAG
1-2 SPAG is poor and hinders understanding
3-4 SPAG is accurate

25. Interpretation 1
Interpretation 2
Content:
What does it say?
What OK have you got to back this up?
OK:
What alternative arguments do you know independently?
Tone:
How is the message conveyed?
Similarities and differences: