1. Don Wright Director of Standards Lexmark International don@lexmark.com
P2600 Hardcopy Device and System Security August 2008 Working Group Meeting
Don Wright
Director of Standards
Lexmark International
12/31/2018

2. Opening Agenda Items Self Introductions Approval of the Agenda
12/31/2018

3. Agenda Items Monday/Tuesday, August 11-12 Welcome & Introductions
Update and Approve Agenda
Review and approve June Minutes
IEEE Patent Policy Review
2008 Meeting Schedule
Update on TCG (Volkoff)
Update on INCITS CS1 Working Group (Thrasher)
Update of CC Vendor's Forum (Sukert)
Review of Action Items from June Meeting
PP Evaluation ad hoc status (Nevo)
12/31/2018

4. Agenda Items Monday/Tuesday, August 11-12
Protection Profiles Review and Comments
PP-A (36c proto)
PP-B (36c proto)
PP-C (36c proto)
PP-D (36c proto)
Comments
Issues raised on
Function Access Control Policy
Guide to P2600 PPs ad hoc status (Sukert)
PP Guide Outline
Production Printing Profile (Sukert)
Draft (36c proto)
12/31/2018

5. Agenda Items Monday/Tuesday, August 11-12 Schedule Review Other items
Posting and Comment deadlines for the September Meeting
Next meeting details
12/31/2018

6. Minutes from June Meeting
Minutes were published shortly after the meeting.
They are available at:
Any additions, deletions or corrections to the June minutes?
12/31/2018

7. Instructions for the WG Chair
The IEEE-SA strongly recommends that at each WG meeting the chair or a designee:
Show slides #1 through #4 of this presentation
Advise the WG attendees that:
The IEEE’s patent policy is consistent with the ANSI patent policy and is described in Clause 6 of the IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws;
Early identification of patent claims which may be essential for the use of standards under development is strongly encouraged;
There may be Essential Patent Claims of which the IEEE is not aware. Additionally, neither the IEEE, the WG, nor the WG chair can ensure the accuracy or completeness of any assurance or whether any such assurance is, in fact, of a Patent Claim that is essential for the use of the standard under development.
Instruct the WG Secretary to record in the minutes of the relevant WG meeting:
That the foregoing information was provided and that slides 1 through 4 (and this slide 0, if applicable) were shown;
That the chair or designee provided an opportunity for participants to identify patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) and/or the holder of patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) of which the participant is personally aware and that may be essential for the use of that standard
Any responses that were given, specifically the patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) and/or the holder of the patent claim(s)/patent application claim(s) that were identified (if any) and by whom.
The WG Chair shall ensure that a request is made to any identified holders of potential essential patent claim(s) to complete and submit a Letter of Assurance.
It is recommended that the WG chair review the guidance in IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual and in FAQs 12 and 12a on inclusion of potential Essential Patent Claims by incorporation or by reference.
Note: WG includes Working Groups, Task Groups, and other standards-developing committees with a PAR approved by the IEEE-SA Standards Board.
12/31/2018
(Optional to be shown)

8. Participants, Patents, and Duty to Inform
All participants in this meeting have certain obligations under the IEEE-SA Patent Policy. Participants:
“Shall inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed)” of the identity of each “holder of any potential Essential Patent Claims of which they are personally aware” if the claims are owned or controlled by the participant or the entity the participant is from, employed by, or otherwise represents
“Personal awareness” means that the participant “is personally aware that the holder may have a potential Essential Patent Claim,” even if the participant is not personally aware of the specific patents or patent claims
“Should inform the IEEE (or cause the IEEE to be informed)” of the identity of “any other holders of such potential Essential Patent Claims” (that is, third parties that are not affiliated with the participant, with the participant’s employer, or with anyone else that the participant is from or otherwise represents)
The above does not apply if the patent claim is already the subject of an Accepted Letter of Assurance that applies to the proposed standard(s) under consideration by this group
(Quoted text excerpted from IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws subclause 6.2)
Early identification of holders of potential Essential Patent Claims is strongly encouraged
No duty to perform a patent search
12/31/2018
Slide #1

9. Patent Related Links
All participants should be familiar with their obligations under the IEEE-SA Policies & Procedures for standards development. Patent Policy is stated in these sources:
IEEE-SA Standards Boards Bylaws
IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual
Material about the patent policy is available at
If you have questions, contact the IEEE-SA Standards Board Patent Committee Administrator at or visit
This slide set is available at
12/31/2018
Slide #2

10. Call for Potentially Essential Patents
If anyone in this meeting is personally aware of the holder of any patent claims that are potentially essential to implementation of the proposed standard(s) under consideration by this group and that are not already the subject of an Accepted Letter of Assurance:
Either speak up now or
Provide the chair of this group with the identity of the holder(s) of any and all such claims as soon as possible or
Cause an LOA to be submitted
12/31/2018
Slide #3

11. Other Guidelines for IEEE WG Meetings
All IEEE-SA standards meetings shall be conducted in compliance with all applicable laws, including antitrust and competition laws.
Don’t discuss the interpretation, validity, or essentiality of patents/patent claims.
Don’t discuss specific license rates, terms, or conditions.
Relative costs, including licensing costs of essential patent claims, of different technical approaches may be discussed in standards development meetings.
Technical considerations remain primary focus
Don’t discuss or engage in the fixing of product prices, allocation of customers, or division of sales markets.
Don’t discuss the status or substance of ongoing or threatened litigation.
Don’t be silent if inappropriate topics are discussed … do formally object.
See IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual, clause and “Promoting Competition and Innovation: What You Need to Know about the IEEE Standards Association's Antitrust and Competition Policy” for more details.
12/31/2018
Slide #4

12. 2008 Meeting Schedule September 9-10: Arlington, VA @ Sharp
October 24: Lexington, Lexmark (with PWG)
December 11-12: Plantation, Equitrac
12/31/2018

13. Trusted Computing Group
Update
12/31/2018

14. INCITS CS1 : Cyber-Security
Update
Thrasher
12/31/2018

15. CS1 topics that might be of interest to P2600
CS1 Project -- Small Organization Baseline Information Security Handbook (approved in CS1 and forwarded to INCITS EB)
Presentation of the NIST proposal for a new project in CS1 – The Policy Machine (no definitive decision, created ad-hoc to further discuss)
ISO/IEC 3rd FCD Information technology -- Security techniques -- Evaluation criteria for IT security -- Part 1: Introduction and general model (approved without comment)
12/31/2018

16. CS1 topics for Sept. meeting that might be of interest to P2600
ISO/IEC 1st CD , Information technology -- Security techniques -- Network security -- Part 1: Guidelines for network security
ISO/IEC 3rd WD ( ) -- Information technology -- Security techniques -- Network security -- Part 2: Guidelines for the design and implementation of network security
ISO/IEC 2nd WD Information technology -- Security techniques - Network security Part 3: Reference network scenarios Risks, design techniques and control issues
12/31/2018

17. CC Vendors Forum
Update
Sukert/Thrasher
12/31/2018

18. Action Items from Previous Meetings
Review entries in P2600-action-items excel spreadsheet
Pre-meeting Spreadsheet ??
12/31/2018

19. Old Business
PP Evaluation ad hoc (Nevo)
Report
12/31/2018

20. Protection Profiles Protection Profiles Comments PP-A PP-B PP-C PP-D
12/31/2018

21. Issues raised on e-mail
Function Access Control Policy
Document
12/31/2018

22. PP Guide Ad Hoc Team Current Status: Plan PP Guide Version 37a posted
Contains expanded outline for all sections plus first draft of sections 1-3.
Draft of Section (Vendor Guidelines) under review
Plan
Post PP Guide Version 38a for Sep 08 P2600 Meeting by Aug 26th
Will incorporate Chapter plus as many additional sections as are available
Have initial text for all sections for posting and review at Oct P2600 Meeting available by Oct 10th
Will try to have as much as we can by then
Approve initial PP Guide at Dec P2600 Meeting
12/31/2018

23. Production Printing Protection Profile
Production Printing Profile Status (Sukert)
Report
Current draft (version 36c proto)
Issues/Comments/Ideas?
12/31/2018

24. Project Schedule
12/31/2018

25. Other Items 2009 Meeting Plan? Others? Is February all we need?
12/31/2018

26. September Meeting Deadlines
All PPs are under change control
All comments must be in the tool
The editor may not make changes EXCEPT based on submitted and accepted comments.
Posting of Documents: August 26, 2008
Posting of Comments: September 2, 2008
12/31/2018

27. Next Meeting Details
September 9-10, 2008
Sharp 1300 Wilson Blvd., Suite 800 Arlington VA 22209
No hotel block
Rosslyn Metro station is diagonally across the street. This area is close to the Key Bridge across the Potomac from Georgetown.
Parking in bldg -- $12 per day ($8 if you arrive before 8 AM). Use the garage entrance on the Fort Meyer Drive side of the building. Take the elevator to the 8th floor.
12/31/2018

28. Next Meeting Location Map
12/31/2018

29. Thanks!
See you in Washington!!
12/31/2018

30. Back-up Charts
BACK-UP CHARTS
12/31/2018

31. Existing Project Schedule
May Meeting (May 21-22)
Feedback from atsec
Recommendation on “family” versus “packages”
June Meeting (June in Longmont CO)
WG Comments on “packages” draft
Feedback from IPA from JBMIA meeting
Update on Production Printing Profile
Make a decision on getting a PAR for Production Printing Profile
Make a decision on the SCHEME(s) to be used
Create new sponsor ballot bodies (After June 28)
August Meeting (Aug 11 & Sharp in Portland OR
Revisit NIAP CIM comments
Deal with SCHEME comments
Deal with WG comments
Draft of Guide
Start Evaluation of PPs (post meeting)
Start .1, .2, .3, & .4 Sponsor Ballot (post meeting)
September Meeting (Sept 9 & 10 at Sharp in Washington DC)
Deal with any comments received from SCHEME/atsec
Work on Guide
October Meeting (Oct 24 at Lexmark in Lexington)
Process sponsor ballot comments on .1, .2, .3, .4
Discuss if PP’s still match Std 2600 – if not, process amendment PAR
December (Dec at Equitrac in Hollywood, FL) Meeting
Process Sponsor Ballot *recirculation” Comments
Finish Guide
12/31/2018

32. Mailing List and Web Site
Listserv run by the IEEE
An archive is available on the web site
Subscribe via a note to: containing the line: subscribe stds-2600
Only subscribers may send to the mailing list.
No Change
12/31/2018