Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Volume 64, Pages S3-S12 (December 2003)
Patient and technique survival on peritoneal dialysis in the United States: Evaluation in large incident cohorts Amy Guo, Salim Mujais Kidney International Volume 64, Pages S3-S12 (December 2003) DOI: /j x Copyright © 2003 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions
2
Figure 1 Age distribution of all patients in the three cohorts compared to data from the USRDS on new patients entering dialysis. Kidney International , S3-S12DOI: ( /j x) Copyright © 2003 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions
3
Figure 2 Proportions of patients in the 2000 cohort who transferred to hemodialysis during the first year on peritoneal dialysis (PD) by causes of transfer. Kidney International , S3-S12DOI: ( /j x) Copyright © 2003 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions
4
Figure 3 Proportions of patients in the 2000 cohort in the three patient categories who transferred to hemodialysis during the first year on peritoneal dialysis (PD) by the most common causes of transfer. Kidney International , S3-S12DOI: ( /j x) Copyright © 2003 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions
5
Figure 4 Proportions of patients in the 2000 cohort in the three patient categories who transferred to hemodialysis during the first year on peritoneal dialysis (PD) because of infection by diabetic status. Kidney International , S3-S12DOI: ( /j x) Copyright © 2003 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions
6
Figure 5 Time trends in the proportions of patients in the three cohorts and in the three patient categories who transferred to hemodialysis during the first year on peritoneal dialysis (PD) because of infection. Kidney International , S3-S12DOI: ( /j x) Copyright © 2003 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions
7
Figure 6 Time trends in the proportions of patients in the 1999 and 2000 cohorts who transferred to hemodialysis during the first and second years on peritoneal dialysis (PD) because of catheter malfunction and psychosocial causes. Kidney International , S3-S12DOI: ( /j x) Copyright © 2003 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions
8
Figure 7 Proportions of patients in the 2000 cohort who transferred to hemodialysis during the first year on peritoneal dialysis (PD) by submodality [continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) vs. automated peritoneal dialysis (APD)]. (CAPD vs. APD). Kidney International , S3-S12DOI: ( /j x) Copyright © 2003 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions
9
Figure 8 Proportions of patients in the 2000 cohort who transferred to hemodialysis during the second year on peritoneal dialysis (PD) by submodality [continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) vs. automated peritoneal dialysis (APD)]. Kidney International , S3-S12DOI: ( /j x) Copyright © 2003 International Society of Nephrology Terms and Conditions
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.