1. Don Wright Director of Standards Lexmark International don@lexmark.com
P2600 Hardcopy Device and System Security June 2006 Working Group Meeting
Don Wright
Director of Standards
Lexmark International
12/30/2018

2. Agenda Items Monday/Tuesday, June 19-20 Welcome & Introductions
Update and Approve Agenda
Review and approve May Minutes
IEEE Patent Policy Review
2006 Meeting Schedule
Update on TCG
Update on INCITS CS1 Working Group
Review of Action Items from May Meeting
Topics from
12/30/2018

3. Agenda Items Monday/Tuesday, June 19-20
Merged Document Review – page turner
Document Review of PPs
A (High) PP
B (Enterprise) PP
C (Public) PP
D (SoHo) PP
Other items
Benefits of providing funding for the evals
Next meeting details
Summarize and record action items
12/30/2018

4. Minutes from May Meeting
Minutes were published shortly after the meeting.
They are available at:
Any corrections or changes?
12/30/2018

5. Instructions for the WG Chair
At Each Meeting, the Working Group Chair shall:
Show slides #1 and #2 of this presentation
Advise the WG membership that:
The IEEE’s patent policy is consistent with the ANSI patent policy and is described in Clause 6 of the IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws;
Early disclosure of patents which may be essential for the use of standards under development is encouraged;
Disclosures made of such patents may not be exhaustive of all patents that may be essential for the use of standards under development, and that neither the IEEE, the WG, nor the WG Chairman ensure the accuracy or completeness of any disclosure or whether any disclosure is of a patent that, in fact, may be essential for the use of standards under development.
Instruct the WG Secretary to record in the minutes of the relevant WG meeting:
That the foregoing advice was provided and the two slides were shown;
That an opportunity was provided for WG members to identify or disclose patents that the WG member believes may be essential for the use of that standard;
Any responses that were given, specifically the patents and patent applications that were identified (if any) and by whom.
12/30/2018
(Not necessary to be shown)
Approved by IEEE-SA Standards Board – March 2003 (Revised March 2005)

6. IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws on Patents in Standards
IEEE standards may include the known use of essential patents and patent applications provided the IEEE receives assurance from the patent holder or applicant with respect to patents whose infringement is, or in the case of patent applications, potential future infringement the applicant asserts will be, unavoidable in a compliant implementation of either mandatory or optional portions of the standard [essential patents]. This assurance shall be provided without coercion. The patent holder or applicant should provide this assurance as soon as reasonably feasible in the standards development process. This assurance shall be provided no later than the approval of the standard (or reaffirmation when a patent or patent application becomes known after initial approval of the standard). This assurance shall be either:
a) A general disclaimer to the effect that the patentee will not enforce any of its present or future patent(s) whose use would be required to implement either mandatory or optional portions of the proposed IEEE standard against any person or entity complying with the standard; or
b) A statement that a license for such implementation will be made available without compensation or under reasonable rates, with reasonable terms and conditions that are demonstrably free of any unfair discrimination.
This assurance is irrevocable once submitted and accepted and shall apply, at a minimum, from the date of the standard's approval to the date of the standard's withdrawal.
12/30/2018
Slide #1
Approved by IEEE-SA Standards Board – March 2003 (Revised February 2006)

7. Inappropriate Topics for IEEE WG Meetings
Don’t discuss the validity/essentiality of patents/patent claims
Don’t discuss the cost of specific patent use
Don’t discuss licensing terms or conditions
Don’t discuss product pricing, territorial restrictions, or market share
Don’t discuss ongoing litigation or threatened litigation
Don’t be silent if inappropriate topics are discussed… do formally object. If you have questions, contact the IEEE-SA Standards Board Patent Committee Administrator at or visit This slide set is available at
12/30/2018
Slide #2
Approved by IEEE-SA Standards Board – March 2003 (Revised March 2005)

8. Officers Chair: Don Wright, Lexmark Vice Chair: Lee Farrell, Canon
Secretary: Brian Smithson, Ricoh
Editors:
Non-PP clauses: Jerry Thrasher, Lexmark
PP clauses: Brian Smithson, Ricoh
12/30/2018

9. 2006 Meeting Schedule July 26-27, Rochester, NY @ Xerox
September 6-7, Boulder, IBM
October 23-24, Lexington Lexmark
December 11-12, Orange Canon
12/30/2018

10. Schedule Schedule Clauses 1-9, Informative Annex Protection Profiles
Ready for merging
May & June meeting reviews
Protection Profiles
Waiting for July draft of CCV3
into the PPs by Sept?
PPs reviewed and iterate 1 or 2 times
Complex changes: who knows?
Complete draft out of December meeting
12/30/2018

11. Schedule Schedule January 2007 February March
Form IEEE ballot body
Engage with CC Eval Labs
February
Start Balloting
Start Evaluation of PPs
March
April -- (Will need group meeting)
Reconcile comments from IEEE and Eval Labs
May – June - July
Recirculations
September
RevCom / Standards Board Approval
12/30/2018

12. Trusted Computing Group
Update
12/30/2018

13. INCITS CS1 : Cyber-Security
Update
12/30/2018

14. Group General Action Items from May
Update web site with July meeting details – done
Convert PP-A to CIM EAL 3 – (due in July)
Harmonize Subject/Object implementation – (waiting for CCV3, part 2)
Company funding of Evaluations:
DAPS: $10 – 20K
Lexmark: $5K (possibly more)
Ricoh, HP – not immediately rejected
Canon, Sharp, Oki, Océ, Toshiba – wants to better understand the benefits of paying versus not paying
12/30/2018

15. Action Items from Previous Meetings
Any update on CCV3 plans from NIAP?
Discussion on “Standard” versus “Recommended Practice”
Presentation from the PP team on mandating of encryption in PP-A and PP-B. (AI #198)
Review entries in P2600-action-items excel spreadsheet
12/30/2018

16. Issues raised on e-mail
T.UD.PHY.OUTPUT objectives (Smithson)
Tentative decisions:
O.Access also needed for PP-A & PP-B
O.I&A also needed for PP-A
OE.Location & OE.Train are also needed (except OE.Location for PP-C?)
Secure Fax (Sameer)
Won’t attempt to protect user data across fax lines
Will address issue of accessing the network via connecting through fax port (“T.EA.FAX_BRIDGE”?)
PP Clause 1.2 compliance with NIAP Policy Letter #13 (Sukert)
“The Target of Evaluation (TOE) of this Protection Profile is the entire Hardcopy Device (HCD) as available to end customers, i.e., the compliant configuration.”
12/30/2018

17. Issues raised on e-mail
Elevation of DOS threats in PPs (Smithson)
Update tables 61 and 63 as per Smithson’s note
PP-A/PP-B proposals (Smithson)
Concerns expressed about removing .UD.SALVAGE from DAPS. Others expressed a concern about .UD.SNIFF.NET.
Everyone should review this proposal in detail and be prepared to make a decision in July. Position papers from everyone are encouraged.
No great concern about removing .AUD.ACCESS
Look at new clause 3.1 in PP-A (Smithson)
Other PPs should take basic robustness text (unmodified) from CIM instruction #3 and insert as clause 3.1.
12/30/2018

18. Document Section Status
Editors Assigned:
Clauses 1-9 & non-PP Annexes: Jerry Thrasher
Protection Profiles: Brian Smithson
PP-A -- Ron Nevo
PP-B -- Brian Smithson
PP-C -- Nancy Chen, Alan Sukert
PP-D -- Carmen Aubry
12/30/2018

19. Document Review Drafts needing most review Others? Merged Draft
Result of meeting posted as version 20b
Others?
12/30/2018

20. Document Review: PP-A Review Draft number 20a
Now Protection Profile A, EAL 3
Not Reviewed -
Insufficient Time
12/30/2018

21. Document Review: PP-B Review Draft number 20a
Now Protection Profile B, EAL 2
Not Reviewed -
Insufficient Time
12/30/2018

22. Document Review: PP-C Review Draft number 20a
Now Protection Profile C, EAL 2
Not Reviewed -
Insufficient Time
12/30/2018

23. Document Review: PP-D Review Draft number ??
Now Protection Profile D, EAL1
Not Reviewed -
Insufficient Time
12/30/2018

24. Next Meeting Details July 26-27
Xerox Building Publishers Parkway Webster NY 14580
Map:
12/30/2018

25. Next Meeting Details
12/30/2018

26. Next Meeting Details
12/30/2018

27. Backup Slides
12/30/2018

28. Mailing List and Web Site
Listserv run by the IEEE
An archive is available on the web site
Subscribe via a note to: containing the line: subscribe stds-2600
Only subscribers may send to the mailing list.
No Change
12/30/2018