Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Sustainable Food Supply Chain
Ananya Bhattacharya MGF5691
2
Creation of local and shorter food supply chains
Agricultural and sustainable land use practices Organic farming, higher importance of farmers’ markets, home deliveries, community supported agriculture Promote: economic objectives, social-cultural-environmental dimensions of rural developments Local foods help farmers to add/retain value: saving energy/reducing food miles, providing social care, reduce emissions Reduce food related wastages “reconnect our farming/food industry with its market/food chain, connect food chain with countryside, reconnect consumers with what they eat, how it produced”
3
Economy, efficient producers, enhanced incomes, less burden on the taxpayer
Society, better health, high animal welfare standards, stronger rural communities Environment, conserving natural resources, maintaining biodiversity, land management, reducing energy consumption, minimizing resource inputs, using renewable energy DEFRA Policies
4
Environmentally beneficial or benign in its production (e.g. organic)
Proximate, originating from the closest practicable source or the minimization of energy use Healthy as part of a balanced diet and not containing harmful biological or chemical contaminants Fairly or co-operatively traded between producers, processors, retailers and consumers Non-exploiting employees in the food sector in terms of rights, pay and conditions Environmentally beneficial or benign in its production (e.g. organic) Accessible both in terms of geographic access and affordability High animal welfare standards in both production and transport Socially inclusive of all people in society Encouraging knowledge and understanding of food and food culture Source: SUSTAIN ( alliance for better food/farming ‘food and farming policies and practices that enhance the health and welfare of people and animals, improve the working and living environment, promote equity, and enrich society and culture’
5
Additional costs for oversight, logistics, pipeline inventory and quality management, heightened vulnerability greater SC risks, lower visibility, transparency, global financing, lower responsiveness Wholefood: do not use any of the 83 ingredients unacceptable in food products, favors local sourcing but no restrictions for suppliers to source globally
6
Economically sustainable, environmentally beneficial, socially supportive communities
Food mile measurement: distance that a food product travels geographically from the point of its origin to its final destination (actual miles travelled or emissions generated during the transport of a product along each step in its SC) Consumers personal choice: retailers who stock local foods/go farmers’ market Local sourcing
7
Trade-offs between food waste and packaging
40% (or around 1.3b tons) of all food intended for human consumption in developed countries end up as waste Around 4.2 m tonnes of food waste are disposed to landfills in Australia/year (2.7m from households, 1.5 m from C&I) C&I sector: food services (2% recycled), food manufacturing (88% recycled), food retail sectors (5% recycled) Other areas: agricultural production/post-harvest handling/storage, processing/packaging, distribution, food service, at home Trade-offs between food waste and packaging Single-serve format: less food waste but more packaging per serve Global food waste: USD 750b Disposal to landfills Food related poverty and security TBL impacts of food waste Food waste facts
8
Agricultural production/post-harvest handling & storage
Focus on primary & secondary packaging with ventilation & temperature control Reusable plastic crates, stable corrugated cartons in conjunction with the introduction of retailer-owned ripening rooms Redirect to food rescue organisation such as Foodbank Processing and packaging Fit for purpose secondary packaging for travel Pre-packed/processed foods Use of packaging materials and technologies to extend shelf life Date marking (use-by…best-before…) Design for small households & changing consumption patterns Distribution Tracking supply chain losses Intelligent packaging & data sharing (Coles Supermarkets) Retails ready packaging How to use packaging in different stages in supply chain to reduce food waste?
10
Retailers and food waste
In the UK the top seven food retailers account for 87% of the grocery market, such as Kroger, Sainsbury’s, Tesco, Carrefour and Walmart Pressure on retailers due to high volume-low margin business model, competition from discount shops, increasing wholesale prices and changing consumer demands
11
A four-pronged strategy
Upgrade inventory system with the latest technology Example: Whole Foods and Target USA are using software Partners with farmers in the supply chain 7% of produce is left unharvested in fields every year due to the tendency of growing more than needed Resting farmers as partners rather than contractors & investing in the long-term sustainability Examples: Sainsbury in the UK and Marks and Spencer, Farming Data App Modify or eliminate traditional store practices that increase waste Selling imperfectly looking produces too Distributing surplus but edible food to charities Use of technology Use of proper date labelling Different ways to display produces
12
A four-pronged strategy (continues…)
Team up with consumers Food retailers campaigns Inspiration from the chefs
13
Examples of primary-packaging design to reduce food waste in the home
Design features Description Potential impact on food waste Reclosable packs Examples include zip-lock bags and pouches, resealable cheese and cereal bags, and ‘fridge packs’ (plastic screw-top jars) for products like baked beans. Being able to reseal packs helps to keep food fresh for longer. Smaller packs Examples include half loaves of bread and single serves of yoghurt. Allow smaller households to only buy what they need. Subdivided packs Packs divided into portions, e.g. sliced meat in separate compartments. Allow consumers to use what they need and keep the remainder sealed in the packaging. Detailed storage advice on the label This could include where to store the food, e.g. whether or not it should be stored in the fridge, or encouraging consumers to ‘freeze before the date’. Could improve food storage practices and extend shelf life in the home.
14
Examples of intelligent packaging and impacts on food waste
Technology Description Potential impact on food waste Challenges Radio-frequency identification (RFID) tag (‘smart tag’) in primary, secondary or tertiary packaging Contains a microchip, normally enclosed in plastic, which stores data on the product, e.g. use-by date. Hundreds of tags can be read simultaneously from metres away. Can be used to trace products throughout the supply chain (in transport, at the distribution centre, entering and leaving the backroom at the retail store etc.). RFID tags improve inventory control, minimizing ‘out of stock’ and ensuring that products are sold before they are out of date and require disposal. They can also record the temperature history of the product. High infrastructure costs compared with bar codes. Accuracy problems in applications involving a large amount of metal or water. Thermal sensors A range of technologies that can indicate the time–temperature history of the product, e.g. thermochromic inks that change colour when a temperature has been exceeded or changed, or digital data loggers that can indicate the period during which a product experienced out-of-tolerance temperatures. Can be used to ensure that products stay within their required temperature range during distribution, particularly in cold chains. Time–temperature labels on consumer packaging can also help consumers to know when a product is safe to eat. Higher packaging costs. Exposure of thermochromic inks to ultraviolet light, high temperatures or solvents may degrade colours or functionality.
15
Papargyropoulou et al 2014
16
Nestle water The past president of Nestle believed that ‘right’ to water is an extreme solution. Nestle, as a whole, believed that access to water is rather a ‘need’. UN, on the other hand, recognized the human ‘right’ to water. As a CEO of Nestle, what is your opinion? As a regular consumer of Nestle’s products, what is your opinion? How should Nestle frame its approach to water resource management in its supply chain?
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com Inc.
All rights reserved.