Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

SGMHA Evaluation Process

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "SGMHA Evaluation Process"— Presentation transcript:

1 SGMHA Evaluation Process

2 Purpose Create a transparent process for all our members to know & understand Ensure all divisions follow the same process Ensure correct placement of players Minimize on-ice issues during evaluations (Strong vs Weak) Minimize wasted ice slots based on previous evaluation process Peewee AA and PAC to follow a separate process Gain buy-in from the Executive on this process

3 Evaluators Qualified evaluators
Any person that applies to be a Head CoachSend out requesting applications – Develop questions Credit towards fees or concession shifts? Evaluators must commit to attend all skates in session or scores do not count Plan to have training session including COO, Division Directors and Evaluators

4 Scoring System Same sheets as used in past
All divisions to use same 5 point system Ensure understanding of point system Can use 0.5 increments as needed Comments are Important Eliminate names from the sheets Educate evaluators on the process

5 SGMHA General Evaluation Flow

6 Random Placement (Alphabetical) Pre-Grouping of Players
Random vs Pre-Group Random Placement (Alphabetical) Pre-Grouping of Players Discourages weaker players Allows weaker players to play the game Showcases weaker players Puts equivalent skilled players together Showcases strong players ability to be individuals Difficulty in grouping first year players with second year players Peewee used 12 hours of ice to determine bottom 30 and top 30. More effective use of evaluation ice Max two skates with equal skill level to determine placement Potentially four skates with equal skill level to determine placement

7 Sample Pre Group (assume 120 skaters for Atom)
Age Category Previous Team # Players Pre Rank Position 60 2nd Year Players Atom AA 8 Top 32 (32) Atom A Atom House 1 60 1st Year Players Novice 1 Atom House 2 10 33-67 (34) Atom House 3 Novice 2 Novice 3 Atom House 4 68-94 (26) Novice 4 Novice 5 Atom House 5 (28) Novice 6 Novice 7-8 Age Category Previous Team # Players Pre Rank Position 2nd Year Atom AA 8 Top 30+ 60 Returning Players Atom A Atom House 1 Atom House 2 10 31-60 Atom House 3 Atom House 4 61-90 Atom House 5 91-120 1st Year Novice AA 60 1st Year Players Novice A Novice House 1 Novice House 2 Novice House 3 Novice House 4 Novice House 5

8 Evaluation Teams Avoid Confusion for Members utilizing following evaluation team naming: Group 1 – Team White / Team Black Group 2 – Team White / Team Black Group 3 – Team White / Team Black Group 4 – Team White / Team Black

9 Sample Schedule - Atom

10 Player Selections *Below example based on 15 player teams*
Based on results of evaluations Up to ten removed from skates 1 and 2 are not automatically on Team 1 Top 10 overall must be selected to Team 1 Coaches have input on remaining players for team – Players 11 to 15 (see example below) Division director to review rankings with selected Coach Coach should be allowed to select an extra forward over defense Allow a 0.5pt difference max when choosing between remaining players Player Rank Score 11 3.75 12 13 3.7 14 3.6 15 Player Rank Score 16 3.6 17 3.5 18 19 20 3.4 Player Rank Score 21 3.4 22 3.35 23 3.25 24 25

11 Player Selection Process *Example based on 15 player teams*

12 Goalies Skill session scores to SUPPORT overall goalie ranking
Skills alone do not rank the goalies from 1-10 Skill session score to be worth 25% of overall score Game play score to be worth 75% of overall score

13 Peewee AA Similar to PAC Players pay to take part of evaluations
Two skate guarantee for every player Players who are released are not guaranteed spot on next team Must take part in Tiered Peewee Tryouts with all other players Team selection to be done via ‘Coach Draft’ after top 12 forwards, 6 defense and 2 goalies are assigned to the two teams Process primarily completed by 15-Sep (i.e. Potential imports until 20-Sep) Teams cannot be posted until Import timeline is over

14 Peewee AA – Flowchart

15 Peewee AA – Ice Schedule (‘Draft’)
DAY MONTH DATE RINK START END LENGTH PURPOSE LEVEL HOME VISITOR TUESDAY SEPT 6 TLC-N 18:15 19:15 1:00 TRYOUTS PEEWEE AA GROUP 1 VS 4 19:30 20:30 GROUP 2 VS 3 WEDNESDAY 7 GROUP 1 VS 3 GROUP 2 VS 4 THURSDAY 8 G.F. 18:00 19:00 GROUP 1 VS 2 20:15 GROUP 3 VS 4 21:30 GOALIES PAA & TIERED SATURDAY 10 STU BARNES 18:45 1:30 INTERSQUAD #1 SUNDAY 11 15:45 17:15 INTERSQUAD #2 MONDAY 12 AA COLTS PRAC AA PREDATORS 14 PREDATORS COLTS 15 COMPARISON 19:45 21:15 EVAL SCRIMMAGE 1 GROUP 1 - B VS W FRIDAY 16 GROUP 2 - B VS W 20:00 GROUP 3 - B VS W 17 16:30 SCRIMMAGE 3 8:00 9:30 SCRIMMAGE 2 9:45 10:15 0:30 10:30 12:00 12:15 13:00 0:45 18 TLC-S 14:00 15:30 SCRIMMAGE 4 17:30

16 Peewee AA - DRAFT Division Director and Chair of Operations to be Present Division Director to set the time and place for Draft Each Coach automatically gets their own child Coach who has child with Lowest Overall Ranking will receive 1st Selection Alternate picks for players to fill roster. Each Coach will select players after they are assigned their top 11 players (6 forwards, 4 Defenceman, 1 Goalie) Division Director & Chair of Operations to sign-off on Rosters and Submit to Registrar

17 Coach Selections Interview coaches as necessary
Select coaches based on qualifications and results Where does child rank Needs to happen as early as possible


Download ppt "SGMHA Evaluation Process"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google