Presentation on theme: "doc.: IEEE <doc#>"— Presentation transcript:
1 doc.: IEEE 802.15-<doc#> <month year>doc.: IEEE <doc#>Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)Submission Title: [Additional comment resolutions related to RIT mode]Date Submitted: [June 1, 2010]Source: [Hiroshi Harada1, Fumihide Kojima1, Ryuhei Funada1, Sum Chin Sean1, Takaaki Hatauchi2, Minoru Tanabe3, Tomonori Sato4, Kentaro Sakamoto5, Aiichiro Kashiwagi6, Takahiro Banno7, Hirohito Nishiyama8]Company [1NICT, 2Fuji Electric, 3Panasonic, 4Toshiba Toko Meter Systems, 5Tokyo Gas, 6Osaka Gas, 7Toho Gas, 8Mitsubishi Electric Corp.]Address [13-4, Hikari-no-oka,Yokosuka-shi, Kanagawa, , Japan]Voice:[ ]FAX: [ ]]Re: [TG4e comment resolution]Abstract: [Comment resolutions related to the RIT mode]Notice: This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein.Release: The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P<author>, <company>
2 <month year>doc.: IEEE <doc#>SummaryThis document describes the proposed resolution on the comments related to RIT mode (sub category of Low Energy subgroup), provided in e (LB53 Consolidated Comment Database).The following comments are addressed;CID# 704, 710, 711, 712, 714, 715, 717, 719, 720, 722, 820 and 1576.Page 2<author>, <company>
3 Comment with proposed resolution as “Accept” Proposed resolutions to the following comments are “Accept”CID# 704, 710, 711, 712, 714, 717 and 720These are rather “editorial” and are no additional instructions requiredRevise as provided in “Proposed Change”CID# 715Revised Figure (Figure 73.r) is provided in slide 4 (next slide).CID# 722Revised Figure (Figure 73.r) is provided in slide 5.
4 Revision of Figure 73.q Resolution to CID #715 Insert description of timer
5 CID #719 Comment: “During what period?” Proposed resolution: Accept in PrincipleAt page 179 line 9, insert the underlined text as follows;"During macRitTxWaitTime period,…".
6 CID #820Comment: “It is not clear why FCS_ERROR should be propagated to the NHL...”CID #1576Comment: “don’t have enumeration of "FCS_ERROR" in this draft.”Proposed resolution for CID #820: AcceptDelete FCS_ERROR. Detailed revising instructions regarding to the corresponding resolution are provided in the following slides.Proposed resolution for CID #1576: Accept “FCS_ERROR” will be removed by the comment resolution of CID #820
7 Revision related to resolution of CID #820 and #1576 MAC enumeration descriptionDelete the whole section from the draft (page 17, line 5–7)LE-specific MAC sublayer service specificationDelete the whole subclause (page 65, line 21 to page 66, line 18)Renumber the succeeding subclause ( > )Periodical RIT data request transmission and receptionReplace the second and third paragraph with the following; “Upon reception of frame after the transmission of RIT data request command, it notifies its arrival to the next higher layer by initiating corresponding indication primitive. At the completion of frame reception, the device may set macRitPeriod parameter to zero (RIT off) at the discretion of the next higher layer. If this is the case, it shall stop periodical transmission of RIT data request command and become always active until macRitPeriod parameter is set to non zero value by the next higher layer again. During this period (macRitPeriod equals to zero), all transactions shall be handled as those of normal non beacon-enabled PAN (macRxOnWhenIdle: False).”
8 Revision of Figure 73.r Resolution to CID #722 Insert space between "exchangedata"Resolution to CID #820 and #1576Remove sequence chart relating to MLME-FRAME-ERROR