1. Open public consultation on the FEAD
FEAD Evaluation Partnership Meeting 28 April 2017
Jiri POLASEK
Evaluation and Impact Assessment Unit
DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion

2. Content
Timing
Responses
What next…

3. Timing Launched 06 February 2017 Open until 05 May 2017
Report mid 2017

4. Partner organisations
Responses – by country and role
TOTAL
No role
Partner organisations
MA/IB/CA
Similar Non FEAD
Advocacy groups
End-recipient
Austria 4 1 2
Belgium 20 11 3
Bulgaria
Croatia 5
Czech Republic
Cyprus
Denmark
Estonia
Finland
France
101 25 68
Germany
200 8 65 33 40 49
Greece 17 7
Hungary
Ireland 15 6
Italy 23
Latvia 56
Lithuania 13
Luxembourg
Malta
Netherlands
Poland
Portugal
Romania
Slovak Republic
Spain
Sweden 10 UK
Other
Total
513 80
189 71 69 81

5. Responses – Relative distribution by type of FEAD assistance the respondent is involved in

6. Responses – Knowledge of FEAD
Role in FEAD
Doesn’t know FEAD
Detailed knowledge
General knowledge
Total
Individuals receiving support FEAD (n=19)
11%
26%
63%
100%
Individuals receiving support not FEAD (n=4)
50%
25%
Org representing most deprived (n=81) 5%
32%
No role (n=80)
24%
13%
64%
FEAD MA/IB (n=54) 0%
69%
31%
C&A authorities (n=7)
PO delivering FEAD support to individuals (n=189) 1%
74%
Other organisation involved in FEAD (n=11)
36%
Org engaged with most deprived, no FEAD (n=68) 4%
19%
76%
6.0%
29.4%
64.5%

7. Responses – Qualitative
Do you think FEAD support is useful to:
Agree
Disagree
No opinion
Alleviate food deprivation
84% 7% 9%
Alleviate severe material deprivation
69%
14%
17%
Contribute to social inclusion of the most deprived persons
80%
12%

8. What next… Promote Mainly in countries with low response rate
Focus on PO
Response on behalf of MA is needed
Link to OPC: term

9. Thank you