Sept 2009 Closing Plenary Reports

802.11 Sept 2009 Closing Plenary Reports
May 2006 doc.: IEEE /0528r0 Sept 2009 Sept 2009 Closing Plenary Reports Date: Authors: Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

May 2006 doc.: IEEE /0528r0 Sept 2009 Abstract This document is a digest of the closing reports of all sub-groups for presentation at the Sept 2009 closing plenary meeting. Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

802_11-15 Joint Treasurers Report for Sept 2009
May 2006 doc.: IEEE /0528r0 September 2009 802_11-15 Joint Treasurers Report for Sept 2009 Date: Authors: Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 1 of 11-09/0993r1 by Slide ‹#› Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

Project: IEEE 802.15 Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Submission Title: [WG-Treasurer’s Report September 2009] Date Submitted: 19September09 Source: [John Barr] Company [JRBarr, Ltd.] Address [21939 Old Farm Road, Deer Park, IL 60010] Voice:[ ], FAX: [], Re: [] Abstract: [Treasurer’s Report to /11 WG] Purpose: [Treasurer’s report to WG to update them from the last session.] Notice: This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by Septemberr 2009 May 2006 doc.: IEEE /0632r0 doc.: IEEE /0528r0 Sept 2009 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 2 of 11-09/0993r1 by Slide ‹#› Page 4 John Barr, JRBarr, Ltd. Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

Treasury (actual) Reserves: Sept 2009 July 11, 2009 - $228,143.72
May 2006 Septemberr 2009 doc.: IEEE /0632r0 doc.: IEEE /0528r0 Sept 2009 Treasury (actual) July 11, $228,143.72 September 18, $228,436.25 Wachovia: $228, = $228,436.25 Additional funds remain in Face-to-Face Events account: F2F ≈ $73778 (Sept09) Reserves: Meeting Expense Reserve - $302,214 L50S and Audit Accepted by IEEE-SA Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 3 of 11-09/0993r1 by Slide ‹#› Page 5 John Barr, JRBarr, Ltd. Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

Hawaii Meeting Start of Week
May 2006 Septemberr 2009 doc.: IEEE /0632r2 doc.: IEEE /0528r0 Sept 2009 Hawaii Meeting Start of Week Registration Income: $316,550 (345/133/2/-14) 468 Total Meeting Expense Estimate: $319,707 AV $22,400 Financial Fees $13,162 Meeting Planner $48,250 Food & Beverage $132,500 Network Services $52,095 Social $37,000 Shipping $12,750 Misc $1,543 Hotel Credit $19,950 Surplus/Deficit $16,793 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 4 of 11-09/0993r1 by Slide ‹#› Page 6 John Barr, JRBarr, Ltd. Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

Hawaii Meeting End of Week
May 2006 Septemberr 2009 doc.: IEEE /0632r2 doc.: IEEE /0528r0 Sept 2009 Hawaii Meeting End of Week Registration Income: $353,300 (346/135/31/-14) 500 Total Meeting Expense Estimate: $346,427 AV $22,400 Financial Fees $14,632 Meeting Planner $50,000 Food & Beverage $155,500 Network Services $52,095 Social $37,500 Shipping $12,750 Misc $1,550 Hotel Credit $20,925 Surplus/Deficit $27,768 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 5 of 11-09/0993r1 by Slide ‹#› Page 7 John Barr, JRBarr, Ltd. Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

Historical Attendance
May 2006 Septemberr 2009 doc.: IEEE /0632r2 doc.: IEEE /0528r0 Sept 2009 Historical Attendance 2003 420 - Ft. Lauderdale (47, ,118) 561 - DFW (72, ,354) 491 - Singapore (22, ,319) 2004 650 - Garden Grove ( 13, ,735) 714 - Berlin ( 25, ,257) 2005 802 - Monterey (11, ,183) 523 - Cairns (Australia) (60, ,375) 759 - Garden Grove (87, ,114) 2006 740 - Hawaii ($32,272) 564 - Jacksonville ($55,163) 350 - Melbourne ($38, ,184) 2007 478 - Montreal ($750 - $17,425) 439 - Hawaii ($28,200 - $17,720) 2008 361 - Taipei ($126,352 - $24,636) 402 - Jacksonville ($1,850 - $39,459) 379 – Hawaii ($13,343 - $8,557) 2009 355 – LA ($4,724 - $9,835) 344 – Montreal ($8,676 - $29,948) 500 – Hawaii ($16,793 - $27,768) Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 6 of 11-09/0993r1 by Slide ‹#› Page 8 John Barr, JRBarr, Ltd. Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

Closing Report Date: 2009-09-24 Authors: Sept 2009 May 2006
doc.: IEEE /0528r0 Sept 2009 Closing Report Date: Authors: Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 1 of 11-09/1041r0 by Stephen McCann, RIM Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

Closing report for WNG SC for September 2009, Waikoloa, Hawaii, USA
May 2006 doc.: IEEE /0528r0 Sept 2009 Abstract Closing report for WNG SC for September 2009, Waikoloa, Hawaii, USA Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 2 of 11-09/1041r0 by Stephen McCann, RIM Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

1 presentation Minutes Plans for November 2009
May 2006 doc.: IEEE /0528r0 Sept 2009 1 presentation wng-ieee for-high-speed-mobility.ppt Presentation about IEEE enhancement for high speed mobility support. Mobile vs. Nomadic, Limitation of Market, Connectivity Lost 2 straw polls indicated that the group felt that more information on this topic is required and was not ready for study group creation. Minutes r0 Plans for November 2009 2 hour session Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 3 of 11-09/1041r0 by Stephen McCann, RIM Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

September 2009 TGmb Closing Report
May 2006 doc.: IEEE /0528r0 Sept 2009 September 2009 TGmb Closing Report Date: Authors: Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 1 of 11-09/1085r0 by Matthew Gast, Trapeze Networks Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

May 2006 doc.: IEEE /0528r0 Sept 2009 Abstract Closing report for TGmb for September 2009 interim meeting in Waikoloa, Hawaii, USA. Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 2 of 11-09/1085r0 by Matthew Gast, Trapeze Networks Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

TGmb Status Sept 2009 May 2006 doc.: IEEE 802.11-06/0528r0
(we resolved many comments to refine the draft this week…) (now with a double-digit number of comments resolved…) Photo credit: mugley on Flickr; used with permission (Creative Commons license) Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 3 of 11-09/1085r0 by Matthew Gast, Trapeze Networks Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

Accomplishments No interpretation requests received
May 2006 doc.: IEEE /0528r0 Sept 2009 Accomplishments No interpretation requests received Processed a truckload o’ comments Handled “clause-ectomy” requests on IR PHY, FH PHY, DSSS PHY, and Annex C Approved resolutions for 518 comments; 187 remain Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 4 of 11-09/1085r0 by Matthew Gast, Trapeze Networks Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

Onward to November No change to plan of record
May 2006 doc.: IEEE /0528r0 Sept 2009 Onward to November No change to plan of record Requesting weekly teleconferences every Friday for 90 minutes at 11 am ET Goal: Recirculation letter ballot after November meeting Due to editorial scheduling, it may be running during January meeting Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 5 of 11-09/1085r0 by Matthew Gast, Trapeze Networks Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

Current TGmb Plan of Record
May 2006 doc.: IEEE /0528r0 Sept 2009 Current TGmb Plan of Record May 2008 – Issue Call for Comment/Input July 2008 – begin process input and old Interpretation requests Acknowledge previous Task Group referrals Sept 2008 – PAR revision process started Nov 2008 – close receipt of new input Nov 2008 – WG/EC approval of PAR Revision Dec 2008 – NesCom/SASB approval PAR Revision May 2009 – First WG Letter ballot (includes All published Amendments as of May 2009) Nov 2009 – Recirc start January 2010 – Form Sponsor Pool (45 days) March 2010 – Sponsor Ballot Start (Include all published amendments as of March 2010) July 2010 – Sponsor Recirc March 2011 – WG/EC Final Approval June 2011 – RevCom/SASB Approval Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 6 of 11-09/1085r0 by Matthew Gast, Trapeze Networks Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

References Agenda: 11-09/0941r8 Minutes: 11-09/1010r0
May 2006 doc.: IEEE /0528r0 Sept 2009 References Agenda: 11-09/0941r8 Minutes: 11-09/1010r0 Motions: 11-09/1019r0 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 7 of 11-09/1085r0 by Matthew Gast, Trapeze Networks Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

TGn Closing Report – September 24 ‘09
May 2006 doc.: IEEE /0528r0 Sept 2009 TGn Closing Report – September 24 ‘09 Date: 2009-September-24 Authors: Name Company Address Phone Bruce Kraemer Marvell +1 - 321 4 27 4098 marvell .com 5488 Marvell Lane, Santa Clara, CA, 95054 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 1 of 11-09/1090r0 by Bruce Kraemer, Marvell Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

2009 Timeline – July EC Unconditional
Sept 2009 2009 Timeline – July EC Unconditional July Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Prelim EC package Wed Jun 17 EC review Fri Jul 17 RevCom Package Fri Jul 31 RevCom Meeting Thu Sep 10 StdsBd Meeting Fri Sep 11 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 2 of 11-09/1090r0 by Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

TGn Timeline – Published
May 2006 doc.: IEEE /0528r0 Sept 2009 TGn Timeline – Published Event Name Actual Expected PAR Approved Sep ‘03 Initial WG Letter Ballot Mar ‘06 Recirculation WG Letter Ballot Oct ‘07 Form Sponsor Ballot Pool Jul ‘08 Initial Sponsor Ballot Dec ‘08 Recirculation Sponsor Ballot Jan ‘09 Final WG Approval Jul ‘09 Final EC Approval RevCom/ Stds Board Approval Sep ‘09 Publication Oct ‘09 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 3 of 11-09/1090r0 by Bruce Kraemer, Marvell Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

Sept 2009 Master Schedule Plan Working with the IEEE editorial staff, prepare 11n draft for publication First proofs have been provided by the IEEE editor Publication target is mid-October No further TGn meetings or telecons planned Any additional status reports will be delivered via or in WG11 plenary meetings PAR extension will not be submitted to NesCom TGn reflector and will be mothballed after publication Awards paperwork will be submitted Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 4 of 11-09/1090r0 by Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

Keep in mind Alice Cooper’s School’s Out
Sept 2009 Adjourn Keep in mind Alice Cooper’s School’s Out No more ad hocs No more drafts No more Bruce's dirty looks n's out for summer n's out forever n's out completely Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 5 of 11-09/1090r0 by Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

TGp Closing Report Date: 2009-09-24 Author: Sept 2009 May 2006
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 doc.: IEEE /0528r0 Sept 2009 TGp Closing Report Date: Author: Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 1 of 11-09/1077r0 by Lee Armstrong (Armstrong Consulting, Inc.) Page 24 Bruce Kraemer, Marvell John Doe, Some Company

Abstract TGp closing report for September meetings Sept 2009 May 2006
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 doc.: IEEE /0528r0 Sept 2009 Abstract TGp closing report for September meetings Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 2 of 11-09/1077r0 by Lee Armstrong (Armstrong Consulting, Inc.) Page 25 Bruce Kraemer, Marvell John Doe, Some Company

September Meetings Summary
LB154 completed since July meeting, passed 38 original comments, 23 withdrawn leaving 15 4 editorial 4 technical 7 technical required (6 of which were declined for technical reasons) Result was one comment that forced a change to the document and another recirculation ballot 5 time slots during the week, plus one ad-hoc All comments resolved Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 3 of 11-09/1077r0 by Lee Armstrong (Armstrong Consulting, Inc.)

Sept 2009 Key Motions Authorize a procedural ballot in preparation for recirculation ballot Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 4 of 11-09/1077r0 by Lee Armstrong (Armstrong Consulting, Inc.)

Status D8.0 remains the current draft All comments resolved
Sept 2009 Status D8.0 remains the current draft All comments resolved Change to become D9.0 is a single word Plan recirculation ballot after September meeting Weekly teleconferences planned for every 1500 Piscataway time (temporarily on hold until ballot completion) Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 5 of 11-09/1077r0 by Lee Armstrong (Armstrong Consulting, Inc.)

Motion for Friday Plenary
Sept 2009 Motion for Friday Plenary Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 6 of 11-09/1077r0 by Lee Armstrong (Armstrong Consulting, Inc.)

Motion to authorize a recirculation ballot
Sept 2009 Motion to authorize a recirculation ballot Having approved comment resolutions for all of the comments received from LB154 on TGp P802.11p D 8.0 as contained in document p, Instruct the editor to prepare Draft P802.11p D 9.0 incorporating these resolutions and, Approve a 15 day Working Group Recirculation Ballot asking the question “Should TGp P802.11p D 9.0 be forwarded to Sponsor Ballot?”. (TGp moved by George Vlantis, 2nd by Wayne Fisher, vote: 8, 0, 1) Moved on behalf of TGp Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 7 of 11-09/1077r0 by Lee Armstrong (Armstrong Consulting, Inc.)

TGs Waikoloa Closing Report
May 2006 September 2009 doc.: IEEE /0528r0 doc.: IEEE /1091r0 Sept 2009 TGs Waikoloa Closing Report Date: Author: Name Address Affiliation Phone Guido R. Hiertz Riedel Communications GmbH & Co. KG, Uellendahler Straße 353, Wuppertal, Federal Republic of Germany Philips Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 1 of 11-09/1091r0 by Guido R. Hiertz (Philips) Page 31 Bruce Kraemer, Marvell Guido R. Hiertz (Philips)

TGs closing report for September 2009 meeting
May 2006 September 2009 doc.: IEEE /1091r0 doc.: IEEE /0528r0 Sept 2009 Abstract TGs closing report for September 2009 meeting Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 2 of 11-09/1091r0 by Guido R. Hiertz (Philips) Page 32 Bruce Kraemer, Marvell Guido R. Hiertz (Philips)

Status Current TGs Draft is D3.03
Sept 2009 Status Current TGs Draft is D3.03 The current TGs comment resolution spread sheet is 11-09/471r14 Does not contain all resolutions for the comments resolved this week An annotated agenda for TGs at this meeting is available in 11-09/913r19 The TGs draft minutes will be posted shortly as 11-09/1016r0 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 3 of 11-09/1091r0 by Guido R. Hiertz (Philips)

Sept 2009 Next Steps TGs is holding teleconferences on Wednesdays through the November Plenary at 17:00 (Eastern Time) for up to 1½ hours on the Following Dates October 14th, October 28th, and November 11th Goal for the November 2009 TGs meeting in Atlanta, Georgia, USA: Finish resolving Letter Ballot #147 comments towards a TGs 1st WG Re-circulation Letter Ballot 118 comments remaining to be resolved Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 4 of 11-09/1091r0 by Guido R. Hiertz (Philips)

Closing Report Date: 2009-09-24 Authors: Sept 2009 May 2006
doc.: IEEE /0528r0 Sept 2009 Closing Report Date: Authors: Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 1 of 11-09/1072r0 by Stephen McCann, RIM Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

May 2006 doc.: IEEE /0528r0 Sept 2009 Abstract Closing report for TGu Interworking with External Networks for September 2009, Waikoloa, Hawaii, USA Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 2 of 11-09/1072r0 by Stephen McCann, RIM Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

Re-circulation Letter Ballot 156 progress
May 2006 doc.: IEEE /0528r0 September 2009 Re-circulation Letter Ballot 156 progress Resolved all comments this week Met EC conditions for going forward to sponsor ballot ( r9) 2 Motions for WG Teleconferences 4 Nov 2009 Wednesday at 11 ET 11 Nov 2009 Wednesday at 11 ET Plans for November 2009 Form CRC to resolve initial sponsor ballot comments Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 3 of 11-09/1072r0 by Stephen McCann, RIM Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

September 2009 Closing Report
May 2006 doc.: IEEE /0528r0 Sept 2009 September 2009 Closing Report Date: Authors: Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 1 of 11-09/1074r0 by Dorothy Stanley (Aruba Networks) Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

May 2006 doc.: IEEE /0528r0 Sept 2009 Abstract This document contains the TGv closing report for September 2009. Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 2 of 11-09/1074r0 by Dorothy Stanley (Aruba Networks) Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

Goals and Accomplishments
May 2006 doc.: IEEE /0528r0 Sept 2009 Goals and Accomplishments Comment resolution from LB 155 Completed resolution of LB 155 comments, see Met requirements for Conditional Approval for Sponsor Ballot Report in Teleconferences, ad-hoc None Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 3 of 11-09/1074r0 by Dorothy Stanley (Aruba Networks) Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

Comment Processing Summary
May 2006 doc.: IEEE /0528r0 Sept 2009 Comment Processing Summary Total 24 Technical 12 Editorial Editor Done/To Do 24/0 – No changes to the draft Comment resolutions adopted to date 21, 3 withdrawn Comments remaining Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 4 of 11-09/1074r0 by Dorothy Stanley (Aruba Networks) Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

May 2006 doc.: IEEE /0528r0 Sept 2009 Output Documents v-TGv-September-2009-closing-report.ppt v-September-2009-agenda.ppt v-September-2009-meeting notes Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 5 of 11-09/1074r0 by Dorothy Stanley (Aruba Networks) Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

Motion – Approve LB155 Comment Resolutions
May 2006 doc.: IEEE /0528r0 Sept 2009 Motion – Approve LB155 Comment Resolutions Move to adopt the comment resolutions in as the approved comment resolutions for TGv Draft 7.0 LB 155 comments. Moved: Allan Thomson Seconded: Qi Wang Result Motion Passes Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 6 of 11-09/1074r0 by Dorothy Stanley (Aruba Networks) Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

Motion – Approve Report on Conditional Approval Requirements
May 2006 doc.: IEEE /0528r0 Sept 2009 Motion – Approve Report on Conditional Approval Requirements Approve document as the report to the 802 Executive Committee (EC) showing that P802.11v has met the conditional requirements to proceed to sponsor ballot. Moved: Allan Thomson Seconded: Qi Wang Result Motion passes Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 7 of 11-09/1074r0 by Dorothy Stanley (Aruba Networks) Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

TGv Timeline – Updated Sept, 2009
May 2006 doc.: IEEE /0528r0 Sept 2009 TGv Timeline – Updated Sept, 2009 Initial Working Group Letter Ballot: July 07 – completed Jan 08 – D2.0, May 08 – D3.0, Nov 08 – D4.0 Re-circulation Working Group Letter Ballot: November 08 (D4.0) Mar 09 – D5.0, May 09 – D 6.0, July 09 – D7.0, D7.0(unchanged) Form Sponsor Ballot Pool: August 09 (was June 09) Initial Sponsor Ballot: Oct 09 Oct 09 – D7.0 (was Sept 09) Approved Sponsor Ballot: Nov 09 Jan 09 – D8.0, Feb D9.0, March D10.0, April D11.0 May 12th ( or so) for Revcom June Approval Final WG/EC Approval: July 2010 RevCom/Standards Board Approval: June 4th/June 5th(or so) Note: TGv PAR is authorized through Dec 2010 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 8 of 11-09/1074r0 by Dorothy Stanley (Aruba Networks) Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

Goals for November 2009 Comment resolution on Initial Sponsor Ballot
May 2006 doc.: IEEE /0528r0 Sept 2009 Goals for November 2009 Comment resolution on Initial Sponsor Ballot Recirculation Sponsor Ballot Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 9 of 11-09/1074r0 by Dorothy Stanley (Aruba Networks) Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

References Sept 2009 May 2006 doc.: IEEE 802.11-06/0528r0
Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 10 of 11-09/1074r0 by Dorothy Stanley (Aruba Networks) Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

TGz Hawaii Closing Report
May 2006 doc.: IEEE /0528r0 Sept 2009 TGz Hawaii Closing Report Date: 24 September 2009 Authors: Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 1 of 11-09/1082r0 by Menzo Wentink (Qualcomm) Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

TGz Accomplishments in Hawaii
May 2006 Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 doc.: IEEE /0528r0 Sept 2009 TGz Accomplishments in Hawaii TGz resolved all of the comments received on LB157. The approved comment resolutions are in 11-09/973r1. A report to the EC has been approved that indicates that the conditions for conditional approval under Clause 13 of the LMSC Operations Manual have been met. The EC report is in 11-09/879r7 The goal for Atlanta will be to address the comments received on the first Sponsor Ballot. Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 2 of 11-09/1082r0 by Menzo Wentink (Qualcomm) Page 49 Bruce Kraemer, Marvell John Doe, Some Company

TGac September 2009 Closing Report
May 2006 Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 doc.: IEEE /0528r0 Sept 2009 TGac September 2009 Closing Report Date: Authors: Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 1 of 11-09/1081r0 by Osama Aboul-Magd (Samsung) Page 50 Bruce Kraemer, Marvell Osama Aboul-Magd (Samsung)

May 2006 Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 doc.: IEEE /0528r0 Sept 2009 Abstract This document is the closing report for the TGac for the September 2009 session. Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 2 of 11-09/1081r0 by Osama Aboul-Magd (Samsung) Page 51 Bruce Kraemer, Marvell Osama Aboul-Magd (Samsung)

May 2006 Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 doc.: IEEE /0528r0 Sept 2009 Work Completed A new revision of the TG Channel Models Addendum document was approved by the TG (09/0308r8. Coherence time is set at 400 msec. Added a new Appendix related to Matlab coding. Further consideration for mobile users is needed. A motion was passed to accept 09/992r2 as the starting point for TGac Specification Framework. Expected to form ad hoc groups during the next meeting. Continue the discussion of OBSS issues as related to the task group activities. Motion passed to add Enterprise scenario with OBSS to the Functional Requirements and Evaluation Methodology document Home scenario with OBSS was presented. Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 3 of 11-09/1081r0 by Osama Aboul-Magd (Samsung) Page 52 Bruce Kraemer, Marvell Osama Aboul-Magd (Samsung)

May 2006 Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 doc.: IEEE /0528r0 Sept 2009 November 2009 Goals Form ad hoc groups to start working on the functional blocks approved by the TG. Plan to discuss OBSS related issues with TGaa. Submissions Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 4 of 11-09/1081r0 by Osama Aboul-Magd (Samsung) Page 53 Bruce Kraemer, Marvell Osama Aboul-Magd (Samsung)

Conference Call Times October 15, 2009 November 5, 2009 11:00 ET
May 2006 Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 doc.: IEEE /0528r0 Sept 2009 Conference Call Times October 15, 2009 11:00 ET November 5, 2009 20:00 ET Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 5 of 11-09/1081r0 by Osama Aboul-Magd (Samsung) Page 54 Bruce Kraemer, Marvell Osama Aboul-Magd (Samsung)

TGad September 2009 Closing Report
May 2006 doc.: IEEE /0528r0 Sept 2009 TGad September 2009 Closing Report Date: Authors: Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 1 of 11-09/0985r0 by Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

May 2006 doc.: IEEE /0528r0 Sept 2009 Abstract This document is the closing report for the TGad for the September 2009 session. Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 2 of 11-09/0985r0 by Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

Work Completed Channel Modeling Coexistence Selection procedure
May 2006 doc.: IEEE /0528r0 Sept 2009 Work Completed Channel Modeling 09/995r0, 60 GHz Transmission and Reflection Measurements, Tian-Wei Huang, 09/1011r0, Verification of Polarization Impact Model by Experimental Data, Alexander Maltsev 09/936r1, Intra-cluster response model and parameter for channel modeling at 60GHz, Hirokazu Sawada Coexistence 09/960r0, WirelessHD Coexistence, Jeyhan Karaoguz Selection procedure 09/0935r2, Selection Procedure, Matt Fisher 09/1024r0, Selection Change Proposal, John Barr 09/0935r3, Selection Procedure, Matt Fisher 09/1066r0, Proposed Modification to the Draft ad Selection Procedure, Rolf De Vegt 09/0935r4, Selection Procedure, Rolf De Vegt Motion to adopt 09/0935r3 as the first draft of the TGad selection procedure failed by vote of 26/11/9 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 3 of 11-09/0985r0 by Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

Goals for November Continue working on task group documents
May 2006 doc.: IEEE /0528r0 Sept 2009 Goals for November Continue working on task group documents Technical contributions Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 4 of 11-09/0985r0 by Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

Conference call times Oct 29 Nov 12 Possible topics Sept 2009
May 2006 doc.: IEEE /0528r0 Sept 2009 Conference call times Oct 29 10:00-12:00 ET Nov 12 Possible topics TG documents Functional Requirements Evaluation Methodology Selection Procedure Channel modeling Summary of 15.3c documents for reference (system design, channel model) Coexistence Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 5 of 11-09/0985r0 by Eldad Perahia, Intel Corporation Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

IEEE 802.11 TV White Spaces Study Group Closing Report
May 2006 April 2009 doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0 doc.: IEEE /0528r0 Sept 2009 IEEE TV White Spaces Study Group Closing Report Date: Authors: Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 1 of 11-09/1078r0 by Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion Page 60 Bruce Kraemer, Marvell Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

May 2006 April 2009 doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0 doc.: IEEE /0528r0 Sept 2009 Abstract This presentation is the closing report for the Waikoloa meeting of the IEEE TVWS SG. Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 2 of 11-09/1078r0 by Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion Page 61 Bruce Kraemer, Marvell Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

Sept 2009 Agenda Introduction Study Group rules and expectations The motion that approved this study group Administrative items including the election of a chair Review and approve the minutes from the teleconferences Review the Draft PAR and 5 Criteria [ tvws-par-nescom-form-plus-5c posted September 21st] Plan for November Plenary in Atlanta Request teleconferences Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 3 of 11-09/1078r0 by Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

THANK YOU DOROTHY STANLEY
Sept 2009 Recording Secretary THANK YOU DOROTHY STANLEY Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 4 of 11-09/1078r0 by Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

Accomplishments Chair elected - Rich Kennedy ran unopposed
Sept 2009 Accomplishments Chair elected - Rich Kennedy ran unopposed Study Group by unanimous consent Affirmed by the full WG Approved the teleconference minutes Discussed, edited and approved the PAR and 5 Criteria In the SG: 43/0/1 In the WG: 46/0/2 Selected teleconference slots to request 20:00 ET on October 6th and October 13th Discussed the plan for now until the November plenary Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 5 of 11-09/1078r0 by Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

Documents 11-09-0922-01-tvws-aug-4th-teleconference-minutes
Sept 2009 Documents tvws-aug-4th-teleconference-minutes tvws-september-1st-teleconference-minutes tvws-september-15th-teleconference-minutes tvws-waikoloa-meeting-plan-and-agenda-sept-2009 tvws-par-nescom-form-plus-5c tvws-September-meeting-notes Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 6 of 11-09/1078r0 by Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

Thanks to all who participated!
Sept 2009 Thanks to all who participated! See you in Atlanta Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 7 of 11-09/1078r0 by Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

QoSMAN SG Closing Report – Sept 2009
May 2006 Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 doc.: IEEE /0528r0 Sept 2009 QoSMAN SG Closing Report – Sept 2009 Date: Authors: Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 1 of 11-09/1083r0 by Michael Montemurro, Research In Motion Page 67 Osama Aboul-Magd (Samsung) Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

May 2006 Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 doc.: IEEE /0528r0 Sept 2009 Abstract This document is the closing report for the QoSMAN SG for the September 2009 session. Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 2 of 11-09/1083r0 by Michael Montemurro, Research In Motion Page 68 Osama Aboul-Magd (Samsung) Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

Work Completed Elected David Hunter as SG Secretary
May 2006 Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 doc.: IEEE /0528r0 Sept 2009 Work Completed Elected David Hunter as SG Secretary Elected Michael Montemurro as SG Chair Presentations: Completed and accepted the PAR and 5C document Bring a motion to the WG. Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 3 of 11-09/1083r0 by Michael Montemurro, Research In Motion Page 69 Osama Aboul-Magd (Samsung) Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

May 2006 Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 doc.: IEEE /0528r0 Sept 2009 November 2009 Goals Address any comments on the PAR and 5C document and forward to the EC meeting. Discuss a process the Task Group would follow for creating the QoSMAN amendment Discuss solution requirements for the QoSMAN amendment. Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 4 of 11-09/1083r0 by Michael Montemurro, Research In Motion Page 70 Osama Aboul-Magd (Samsung) Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

May 2006 April 2009 doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0 doc.: IEEE /0528r0 Sept 2009 SG Motion Believing that the PAR and Five Criteria contained in the documents referenced below meet IEEE-SA guidelines, Request that the PAR and the Five Criteria contained in document qm-qosman-par-nescom-form-plus-5cs.doc be forwarded to the WG for approval of the full Working Group. Moved: Henry Ptasinski Seconded: Paul Lambert Vote: Yes – 9, No – 0, Abstain – 1. Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 5 of 11-09/1083r0 by Michael Montemurro, Research In Motion Page 71 Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

May 2006 April 2009 doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0 doc.: IEEE /0528r0 Sept 2009 WG Motion Believing that the PAR and Five Criteria contained in the documents referenced below meet IEEE-SA guidelines, Request that the PAR and the Five Criteria contained in tvws-par-nescom-form-plus-5c be posted to the IEEE 802 Executive Committee (EC) agenda for WG 802 preview and EC approval to submit to NesCom. Moved by Michael Montemurro on behalf of the IEEE QOSMAN SG QOSMAN SG vote: Moved: Henry Ptasinski, Seconded: Paul Lambert, Result: 9-0-1 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 6 of 11-09/1083r0 by Michael Montemurro, Research In Motion Page 72 Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

JTC1 Ad Hoc Sept 2009 Closing Report
May 2006 doc.: IEEE /0528r0 Sept 2009 JTC1 Ad Hoc Sept 2009 Closing Report 25 September 2009 Authors: Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 1 of 11-09/1088r0 by Andrew Myles (Cisco) Bruce Kraemer, Marvell

Sept 2009 The JTC1 ad hoc dealt with issues related to the IEEE 802 relationship with ISO/IEC JTC1 Agenda and results Review purpose of JTC1 ad hoc Deal with issues related to IEEE 802 to ISO/IEC JTC1/SC6 relationship This continues to include WAPI, partially because of continuing assertions by the WAPI promoters that i is insecure Review status of WAPI in ISO/IEC JTC1, IETF and BWIPS WAPI (based on abgh) is likely to be submitted by the China NB to a JTC1 fast track ballot, but has been delayed by copyright concerns Elements of WAPI have been submitted to IETF China BWIPS is developing a WAPI over 11n spec Discuss goals of JTC1 ad hoc’s consideration of WAPI Possibly provide a technical review of WAPI proposal to JTC1NB’s Possibly suggest WAPI be sent to independent security review Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 2 of 11-09/1088r0 by Andrew Myles (Cisco)

Sept 2009 The JTC1 ad hoc dealt with issues related to the IEEE 802 relationship with ISO/IEC JTC1 Agenda and results (continued) Discuss next steps for JTC1 ad hoc’s consideration of WAPI Wait until a WAPI specification is released A number of volunteers expressed an interest in reviewing the WAPI spec Call for volunteers to represent IEEE 802 at next JTC1/SC6 meeting No one volunteered, as it clashes with WG meeting in Jan 10 Discuss any suggested changes by the IEEE WG to the PSDO agreement between IEEE and ISO It is likely that the PSDO agreement will continue without change Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 3 of 11-09/1088r0 by Andrew Myles (Cisco)

Sept 2009 The JTC1 ad hoc will continue to fulfil its charter at the next meeting in Atlanta 09 Likely agenda Identify and deal with any new issues affecting the IEEE 802 to ISO/IEC JTC1/SC6 relationship Discuss agenda of next SC6 meeting and plans for representation Review status and actions related to WAPI Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 4 of 11-09/1088r0 by Andrew Myles (Cisco)

IEEE 802.11 Regulatory Ad Hoc Committee Closing Report
May 2006 April 2009 doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0 doc.: IEEE /0528r0 Sept 2009 IEEE Regulatory Ad Hoc Committee Closing Report Date: Authors: Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 1 of 11-09/1080r0 by Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion Page 77 Bruce Kraemer, Marvell Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

May 2006 April 2009 doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0 doc.: IEEE /0528r0 Sept 2009 Abstract This presentation is the closing report for the Waikoloa meeting of the IEEE Regulatory Ad Hoc Committee. Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 2 of 11-09/1080r0 by Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion Page 78 Bruce Kraemer, Marvell Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

Thank You Bruce Kraemer
Sept 2009 Recording Secretary Thank You Bruce Kraemer Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 3 of 11-09/1080r0 by Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

Agenda Introduction The regulatory summaries
Sept 2009 Agenda Introduction The regulatory summaries North America European Union Asia FOCUS: Input to ERM TG11 on EN v1.8.1 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 4 of 11-09/1080r0 by Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

Accomplishments Discussed relevant regulatory updates
Sept 2009 Accomplishments Discussed relevant regulatory updates Discussed and edited the input to ERM TG11 on the revision of EN (v1.8.1) Approved by the committee Approved by Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 5 of 11-09/1080r0 by Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

Documents 11-09-0997-01-0reg-waikoloa-meeting-plan-and-agenda
Sept 2009 Documents reg-waikoloa-meeting-plan-and-agenda letter-to-erm-tg11-on-en Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 6 of 11-09/1080r0 by Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

Thanks to all who participated!
Sept 2009 Thanks to all who participated! See you in Atlanta Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation from slide 7 of 11-09/1080r0 by Rich Kennedy, Research In Motion

Sept 2009 Closing Plenary Reports

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Sept 2009 Closing Plenary Reports"— Presentation transcript:

Similar presentations

About project

Feedback

Log in

Auth with social network:

Sept 2009 Closing Plenary Reports

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Sept 2009 Closing Plenary Reports"— Presentation transcript:

Similar presentations

About project

Feedback