1. IEEE 802.21 MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN: 21-08-0xxx-00-0000
Title: MIH Security – Use Case Outline
Date Submitted: June 2, 2008
Presented: June 5, 2008, Teleconference
Authors or Source(s):
Lily Chen (NIST)
Abstract: Outline some use cases to be discussed in SSG.
12/3/2018

2. IEEE 802.21 presentation release statements
This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE Working Group. It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein.
The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE
The contributor is familiar with IEEE patent policy, as outlined in Section 6.3 of the IEEE-SA Standards Board Operations Manual < and in Understanding Patent Issues During IEEE Standards Development
12/3/2018

3. Outline
This contribution outlines the use cases to be considered in TR;
Each use case is represented in the flow chart with the colored flow.
Discuss questions
Whether these are valid use cases?
Any other cases we shall include?
For ES and CS, do we need to separate them from IS?
Shall we go ahead to write text for each use case outlined?
12/3/2018

4. Use Case 1.1 MIH Access control? MIH specific auth?no
MIH Access control?
MIH specific auth? no
yes
yes
Access Authentication (maybe mutual through access controller, e.g. service provider)
Mutual Authentication (through a Trusted Third Party, e.g. PKI)
MIH specific protection? no
yes
Transport Authenticity/integrity and confidentiality
Key establishment (MN and PoS)
MIH Authenticity/integrity and confidentiality
The transport protections may or may not in the place
12/3/2018

5. Use Case 1.2 MIH Access control? MIH specific auth?no
MIH Access control?
MIH specific auth? no
yes
yes
Access Authentication (maybe mutual through access controller, e.g. service provider)
Mutual Authentication (through a Trusted Third Party, e.g. PKI)
MIH specific protection? no
yes
Transport Authenticity/integrity and confidentiality
Key establishment (MN and PoS)
MIH Authenticity/integrity and confidentiality
The transport protections may or may not in the place
12/3/2018

6. Use Case 2.1 MIH Access control? MIH specific auth?no
MIH Access control?
MIH specific auth? no
yes
yes
Access Authentication (maybe mutual through access controller, e.g. service provider)
Mutual Authentication (through a Trusted Third Party, e.g. PKI)
MIH specific protection? no
yes
Transport Authenticity/integrity and confidentiality
Key establishment (MN and PoS)
MIH Authenticity/integrity and confidentiality
The transport protections may or may not in the place
12/3/2018

7. Use Case 2.2 MIH Access control? MIH specific auth?no
MIH Access control?
MIH specific auth? no
yes
yes
Access Authentication (maybe mutual through access controller, e.g. service provider)
Mutual Authentication (through a Trusted Third Party, e.g. PKI)
MIH specific protection? no
yes
Transport Authenticity/integrity and confidentiality
Key establishment (MN and PoS)
MIH Authenticity/integrity and confidentiality
The transport protections may or may not in the place
12/3/2018

8. Use Case 3.1 – Same security policy
Home
Visited
1.1
1.2
1.1
1.2
2.1
2.1
2.2
2.2
12/3/2018

9. Use Case 3.2 – Different security policies
Home
Visited
1.1
1.2
1.1
1.2
2.1
2.1
2.2
2.2
12/3/2018