1. Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages 8-12 (March 2018)
A biomechanical comparison of subscapularis repair techniques in total shoulder arthroplasty: lesser tuberosity osteotomy versus subscapularis peel 
Morenikeji Ayodele Buraimoh, MD, Kelechi R. Okoroha, MD, Daniel J. Oravec, MS, Cathryn D. Peltz, PhD, Yener N. Yeni, PhD, Stephanie J. Muh, MD 
JSES Open Access 
Volume 2, Issue 1, Pages 8-12 (March 2018)
DOI: /j.jses
Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

2. Figure 1
Sketch of the lesser tuberosity osteotomy repair technique featuring the horizontal mattress backpack suture repair with a one-third tubular plate.
JSES Open Access 2018 2, 8-12DOI: ( /j.jses )
Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

3. Figure 2
Sketch of subscapularis peel repair featuring medial and lateral drill holes around the lesser tuberosity and a modified Mason-Allen suture pattern in the tendon.
JSES Open Access 2018 2, 8-12DOI: ( /j.jses )
Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

4. Figure 3
Photograph illustration of lesser tuberosity osteotomy repair and material testing system setup.
JSES Open Access 2018 2, 8-12DOI: ( /j.jses )
Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

5. Figure 4
Photograph illustration of subscapularis peel repair and material testing system setup.
JSES Open Access 2018 2, 8-12DOI: ( /j.jses )
Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions

6. Figure 5
Mean repair gapping after cyclical loading. Although mean gapping did not differ, there was a wider range of repair gapping for the lesser tuberosity osteotomy (LTO) group. The error bars show standard deviations. SP, subscapularis peel.
JSES Open Access 2018 2, 8-12DOI: ( /j.jses )
Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) Terms and Conditions