1. Mid Day Meal Scheme MDM-PAB Meeting – WEST BENGAL On 26.03.2009
Ministry of HRD
Government of India
MDM-PAB Meeting – WEST BENGAL On

2. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Part-I
Review of Implementation of MDMS in West Bengal (Primary + Upper Primary) ( to )
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

3. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Questions?
What is the level of unspent balances as on ?
How regular the lifting of food grains? Is there any disruption/shortage in availability of food grains?
What is the level of lifting?
How about cooking cost? Was disbursed to Districts? What is the level of utilisation at school level?
How synchronous utilisation of food grains and cooking cost?
How utilisation of foodgrains reconcile with number of meal served?
…… contd
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

4. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Contd ….., Questions?
How much MME was utilized? Under what activities?
What is the progress in construction of Kitchen Sheds and procurement of kitchen devices?
Part –II
What is the trend in Enrollment and No. of children availing MDM from 2007 to 2008?
How well MDM data compares with SSA data and Census data?
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

5. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Benchmarks
Desirable stock in hand : 15% (+ or - 5%)
Utilisation of foodgrains and cooking cost [ to ]: 37% (+ or – 10%)
Every month 1/12th of foodgrains is lifted & distributed.
Utilisation of foodgrains & cooking cost is synchronous.
State’s AWP&B is in accordance with M/HRD’s guidelines.
Data in the AWP&B is authentic, reliable & based on the records.
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

6. Plan Vs Performance (No. of Meal in Q1+Q2+Q3)
No. of Meal (in Crore)
50% Less
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

7. Plan Vs Performance: (No. of children in Q1+Q2+Q3)
(15% less)
(8% more)
No. of children (In lakh)
(58% less)
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

8. Plan Vs Performance (No. of Working Days in Q1+Q2+Q3)
(41% less)
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

9. NON-COVERAGE : Institutions (Primary)
(10% Not Covered)
No. of Institutions
(4% Not Covered)
(5% NC)
(52% NC)
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

10. NON-COVERAGE : Institutions (Primary) –Dist-wise
Sl. No.
Districts
No. of Institutions
No. of Institution serving MDM
NON-COVERAGE
No. % 1
Kolkata
2,739
862
1,877
69% 2
S/24 Pgs.
5,973
4,407
1,566
26% 3
N/24 Pgs.
5,670
4,551
1,119
20% 4
Hooghly
3,956
3,287
669
17% 5
Burdwan
6,116
5,253
863
14% 6
Nadia
3,853
3,368
485
13%
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

11. NON-COVERAGE : Children availing MDM (U. Primary)
No. of Children (In lakhs)
(58% Not Covered)
(60% Not Covered)
(31% NC)
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

12. NON-COVERAGE : Children availing MDM (U. Primary)- Dist-wise
Total no. of Districts = (Fig. In Lakhs)
Sl. No.
Districts
No. of Children availing MDM as per PAB for
No. of children availing MDM as on
NON-COVERAGE
No. % 1
D/Dinajpur
0.82
100% 2
Hooghly
2.25 3
Kolkata
1.21 4
Nadia
2.48
0.09
2.39
97% 5
N/24 Pgs.
3.71
0.23
3.48
94% 6
S/24 Pgs.
3.23
0.33
2.90
90% 7
Burdwan
2.98
2.65
89% 8
Jalpaiguri
1.78
0.36
1.41
80% 9
Siliguri
0.43
0.12
0.31
71% 10
Howrah
1.82
0.55
1.26
70%
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

13. Analysis: Foodgrains lifting (Month-wise cumulative)
Foodgrains (in MTs)
*: Including unspent balance of MTs as on
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

14. Analysis: Foodgrains lifting (Month-wise)
Foodgrains (in MTs)
*: Including unspent balance of MTs as on
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

15. Level of Unspent Balance of foodgrains
As on
(% of annual allocation)
No. of Districts 0%
Less than 5%
5%-10%
11%-20%
Above 20%
Total 5 4 1 20
As on
(% of annual allocation)
No. of Districts 0%
Less than 5%
5%-10%
11%-20%
Above 20%
Total 7 2 4 6 1 20

16. Analysis: Foodgrains Availability (1.4.08 to 31.12.08)
Foodgrains (in MTs)
100%
47%
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

17. Foodgrains lifting (Availability) – Dist. wise
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

18. Foodgrains Utilisation (1.4.08 to 31.12.08)
Benchmark of Utilization : 73%
2.70 lakh MTs
% Utilisation
1.25 lakh MTs
1.03 lakh MTs
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

19. Foodgrains Utilization– Dist. wise
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

20. Cooking Cost Disbursed and Utilisation (1.4.2008 to 31.12.2008)
Benchmark
Utilisation: 73%
Cooking Cost (in % Disbursed and utilisation.)
Rs Cr.
Rs Cr.
Rs Cr.
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

21. Cooking Cost Utilisation – Dist. wise
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

22. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
MME Utilisation ( to )
Utilisation(Rs. In lakhs)
17%
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

23. Transport Assistance Utilisation (1.4.08 to 31.12.08)
Utilisation(Rs. In lakhs)
(69%)
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

24. Achievement during 2008-09 (Kitchen Sheds)
Progress (in %)
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

25. Achievement during 2008-09 (Kitchen Devices)
Progress (in %)
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

26. Performance Score card – A Summary
Sl. No.
Component
Achievement
Benchmark 1.
Foodgrains Utilisation
38%
73% 2.
Cooking Cost Utilisation
39% 3.
MME Utilisation
17%
100% 4.
Kitchen Shed construction
88% 5.
Kitchen Devices procurement 6.
QPRs received
3 nos.
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

27. Analysis of State’s Proposal for 2009-10
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

28. Time Series – No. of Children (PRIMARY)
No. of children (in lakhs)
(down by 10%)
(down by 21%)
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

29. Primary School Enrolment – SSA [Govt. + Govt.-aided + LB) Vs MDM
(+6%)
(-9%)
No. of children (in lakhs)
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

30. Population Vs Enrolment Vs Availing MDM (PRIMARY)
No. of children (in lakhs)
(Proposed)
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

31. Population Vs Enrolment Vs Availing MDM during 2008-09 (UPPER PRIMARY)
No. of children (in lakhs)
(Proposed)
*:SSA= Govt+LB+GA
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

32. No. of School Working Days (Pry & U Pry) DISE Vs MDM
Sl. No
Year
As per DISE Data
As per MDM Sanctions 1
210
222 3
202 4
Not available 5
(State’s claim for )
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

33. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Thank You
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India