Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Quality Management Futures: can the centre hold?

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Quality Management Futures: can the centre hold?"— Presentation transcript:

1 Quality Management Futures: can the centre hold?
Maureen McLaughlin QSN September 2018

2 QAA’s UK-wide work Quality assessment and assurance UK Quality Code
Advice on degree awarding powers and university title Teaching Excellence Framework Assurance of transnational education Strategic international engagement

3 QAA’S WORK IN THE FOUR UK NATIONS
England Designated quality body Design and implementation of new quality system Quality & Standards Review Wales New Quality Enhancement Review and Gateway Review Post-compulsory education and training reform Welsh language standards QAA’S WORK IN THE FOUR UK NATIONS Scotland Latest enhancement approach Enhancement Theme ( ) Focus On projects Enhancement conferences Northern Ireland Next approach to be confirmed 

4 Divergent approaches Different approaches to quality in different UK nations England – risk-based system (baseline compliance) Scotland – enhancement-led approach (reviews on a five year cycle) Wales – new Quality Enhancement Review (reviews at least every six years) Northern Ireland – to be confirmed

5 UK-wide movement to outcomes-focus
‘We want to focus on outcomes for learners and enhance quality right across the system… There is support for a single quality framework with learners, their experiences and outcomes at its heart.’ 2018 Welsh government consultation on the post-compulsory education system ‘A diverse sector supports student choice. The conditions of registration are explicitly tailored to a diverse set of providers, by focusing on the outcomes a provider is expected to achieve, rather than determining how this should be done. Providers are free to determine their individual mission, strategy and approach.’ 2018 regulatory framework for higher education in England ‘I look to the Scottish Funding Council to continue to develop and improve use of Outcome Agreements to achieve our desired outcomes for learners, for skills development and ultimately for inclusive economic growth in Scotland.’ 2017 Ministerial letter to the Scottish Funding Council

6 In Scotland Let’s look in more detail at the current approaches in the UK nations – starting in Scotland. This Photo by Unknown Author is licensed under CC BY-SA

7 Quality Enhancement Framework (QEF)
Enhancement-led Institutional Review (ELIR) Institution-led quality reviews Student engagement Public information Enhancement Themes

8 Continued commitment to Quality Enhancement Framework and enhancement-led approach
Partnership approach Enhancement-led Institutional Review Current Enhancement Theme Evidence for Enhancement: improving the student experience Focus On projects

9 In Wales In Wales ...

10 Quality Assessment Framework
Gateway Arrangements for established providers Tailored but rapid intervention Degree standards and comparability International reputation • Gateway review • Risk-based review approaches • Scrutiny of data • Annual assurance from governing bodies • Triennial visits • Working in partnership with students • HEFCW complaints process • Guidance • HEFCW’s Quality Assessment Committee • Understanding degree algorithms • Grade inflation / improvement • External examining, professional development and calibration UK Standing Committee for Quality Assessment Transnational education review visits

11 Higher Education (Wales) Act 2015
Quality Assessment Framework for Wales (published March 2018) New quality approaches: - Quality Enhancement Review - Gateway Quality Review: Wales Reform of post-compulsory education and training system: - Proposed new Tertiary Education and Research Commission for Wales

12 In England And in England ...

13 Higher Education and Research Act 2017
Independent designated quality (QAA) and data (HESA) bodies Key functions of the designated quality body: Assessment of quality and standards ​ Advising the OfS on granting, varying or revocation of degree awarding powers and university title

14 Features of the new English framework
‘The Office for Students (OfS) is a new regulator for English higher education. It will adopt a bold, student-focused, risk-based approach, reflecting the significant changes to higher education of the last 25 years and seeking to anticipate the changes still to come.’ Features of the new regulatory framework include: Risk-based, proportionate, outcomes-focused approach to regulation (baseline compliance) Strong focus on value for money for students and taxpayers Single register for providers – 24 conditions of registration New concept in the framework – allows for institutional failure New degree awarding powers (NDAPs) Annual random sampling of providers (e.g. 5%)

15 Work of the designated quality body
Working with the OfS Design and delivery of review methods: Initial registration (Quality & Standards Review) Breach of registration conditions Random sampling component Advice on degree awarding powers Advice on standards assessments Other sector-level activities ‘The OfS welcomes the QAA’s designation as it ensures that the QAA’s expertise as the sector-recognised expert body on quality and standards can be deployed in the new regulatory environment.’

16 Key features of Quality & Standards Review
Expert review Review against the core practices of the UK Quality Code Outcomes focussed Primary evidence Subject specialisms Review visit Student engagement Evidence, data and criteria-based judgements Published report

17 International

18 UK revenue from education-related exports and TNE activity (2015)
UK revenue from education-related exports and TNE activity increased to £19.3bn in 2015 Increase of 22% since 2010 Higher education accounts for 67% (£12.9bn) of this (Department for Education report, Feb 2018)

19 International strategic engagement

20 Transnational education (2016-17)
708,000 TNE students across all continents (except Antarctica): NB 43% registered on OBU Association of Chartered Certified Accountants (ACCA) programmes Top 10 countries for UK TNE ( , student numbers) Malaysia (74,180) China (70,240) Singapore (48,290) Pakistan (43,870) v) Nigeria (32,925) vi) Hong Kong (27,390) Sri Lanka (24,480) viii) Egypt (21,695) Oman (21,250) x) UAE (17,750) Source of data: HESA ( )

21 Quality assuring UK TNE
UK – extended, complex TNE provision​ ​ TNE – a higher risk activity for providers​ Reputational risks and impact​ Importance of trusted quality assurance to maintain international confidence​

22

23 UK Quality Code UK–wide touchstone
Revised version published March 2018 Underpinning advice and guidance Scoping sessions over April Development sessions across all UK Writing and reading groups established Final draft Sept, considered by UKSC, then publication in November Other external reference points

24 Expectations (standards and quality) Supporting reference documents
THE CODE Expectations (standards and quality) Core practices required by all UK HE regulatory jurisdictions Common practices common to the underpinning of quality in all UK providers but not regulatory requirements for providers in England regulated by the OfS Supporting reference documents National frameworks and statements (e.g. Qualifications Frameworks, characteristics statements, benchmark statements) Advice and guidance  (e.g. programme design, admissions, student engagement, etc..)

25 Advice and Guidance Purpose: To underpin the mandatory element of the Code by offering clear, succinct and practical advice and guidance to enable institutions to meet the core and common practices and the expectations, regardless of UK jurisdiction.

26

27 Outcomes relating to themes
Programme Design and Development Admissions, Recruitment and Widening Access Learning and Teaching Enabling Student Achievement Student Engagement Partnerships External Expertise Concerns, complaints and appeals Assessment Research Degrees Work-based learning *

28 Outcomes relating to structure
Introduction & explicit links to core and common practices Key principles Practical advice and guidance on delivery of theme to include enhancements and good practice Monitoring and Evaluation Reporting – Internal and External, Data Sets, Metrics Resources, Further Information, Relevant Organisations & Glossary Overarching Information Practical Advice & Guidance Signposting

29 The virtual interface Over the summer of 2018, QAA has been designing a web based interface for the quality code. Strong focus on the user experience Visually engaging Enclosed map of the site for each theme Links to relevant Documents Links to other areas of the Quality Code

30 27 March 2018 Expectations, core and common practices published April 2018 Scoping events May 2018 Advice and guidance workshops Mid-June 2018 Establishment of advice and guidance writing groups and wider reading groups to include sector wide representatives and experts Early August 1st draft – created virtually. New interactive web design developed and tested by QAA. Early September Final draft Mid-September (11, 13 and 18 Sept) Final edit meetings in Gloucester 17 October 2018 Consideration by UK Standing Committee for Quality Assessment 29 November 2018 Publication and launch

31 Beyond the baseline Above the baseline? .

32 Gaps? Opportunities? With divergence comes opportunity
Sharing experiences, strengths and learnings from the different approaches More cross-border networking Different groupings to work on challenges A UK – wide enhancement approach? Important to international standing and perceptions


Download ppt "Quality Management Futures: can the centre hold?"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google