1. Mid Day Meal Scheme MDM-PAB Meeting – ORISSA On 01.05.2009
Ministry of HRD
Government of India
MDM-PAB Meeting – ORISSA On

2. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Part-I
Review of Implementation of MDMS in Orissa (Primary + Upper Primary) ( to )
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

3. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Questions?
What is the level of coverage – Institution-wise, No. of children-wise, in terms of No. of meal served?
What is the level of unspent balances (Inventory) as on as well as ?
How regular the lifting of food grains? Is there any disruption/shortage in availability of food grains?
What is the level of lifting?
How about cooking cost? Was disbursed to Districts? What is the level of utilisation at school level?
How synchronous utilisation of food grains and cooking cost?
How utilisation of foodgrains reconcile with number of meal served?
…… contd
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

4. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Contd ….., Questions?
How much MME was utilized? Under what activities?
What is the progress in construction of Kitchen Sheds and procurement of kitchen devices?
Part –II
What is the trend in Enrollment and No. of children availing MDM from 2007 to 2008?
How well MDM data compares with SSA data and Census data?
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

5. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Benchmarks
Target Coverage: 100% (Institution-wise, No. of children-wise, in terms of No. of meal served)
Desirable stock in hand : 15% (+ or - 5%)
Lifting of foodgrains [ to ]: 85% (+ or – 10%)
Utilisation of foodgrains and cooking cost [ to ]: 72% (+ or – 10%)
Every month 1/12th of foodgrains is lifted & distributed.
Utilisation of foodgrains & cooking cost is synchronous.
State’s AWP&B is in accordance with M/HRD’s guidelines.
Data in the AWP&B is authentic, reliable & based on the records.
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

6. Plan Vs Performance (No. of Meal in Q1+Q2+Q3)
(Primary + Upper Primary)
7% More
No. of Meal (in Crore)
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

7. Plan Vs Performance: (No. of children in Q1+Q2+Q3)
( 11% More)
No. of children (In lakh)
(5% More)
(29% More)
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

8. Plan Vs Performance (No. of Working Days in Q1+Q2+Q3)
(4% Less)
No. of Working days
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

9. Analysis: Foodgrains lifting (Month-wise cumulative)
Foodgrains (in MTs)
*: Including unspent balance of MTs as on
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

10. Analysis: Foodgrains lifting (Month-wise)
Foodgrains (in MTs)
*: Including unspent balance of MTs as on
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

11. Huge Unspent Balance of foodgrains
(Foodgrains in MTs)
As on
Sl. No.
Districts
USB as on
Annual Requirement
USB as % of Annual Requirement 1
KORAPUT
66% 2
RAYAGADA
50% 3
KANDHAMAL
829.42
38% 4
JHARSUGUDA
339.92
935.54
36% 5
GAJAPATI
667.86
35%

12. Analysis: Foodgrains Availability (1.4.08 to 31.12.08)
Foodgrains (in MTs)
100%
93%
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

13. Foodgrains lifting (Availability) – Dist. wise
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

14. Foodgrains Utilisation (1.4.08 to 31.12.08)
Benchmark : 72%
1.04 Lakh MTs
0.97 Lakh MTs
0.78 Lakh MTs
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

15. Foodgrains Utilization– Dist. wise
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

16. Cooking Cost Disbursed and Utilisation (1.4.2008 to 31.12.2008)
Cooking Cost (in % Disbursed and utilisation.)
Rs Cr.
Benchmark :72%
Rs Cr.
Rs Cr.
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

17. Cooking Cost Utilisation – Dist. wise
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

18. Mismatch in Utilisation of foodgrains and cooking cost (District-wise)
State average: 75%(FG) & 58%(CC)
% Utilisation
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

19. Mismatch in Utilisation of foodgrains and cooking cost (District-wise)
State average: 75%(FG) & 58%(CC)
% Utilisation
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

20. Reconciliation : No. of meals Vs Cooking Cost
(Rs. In Lakhs)
Sl. No
District
No. of Meals served
Expected consumption of Cooking cost
Actual Consumption of Cooking cost
Deficit in %
Deficit Consumption 1
NAYAGARH
401.61
286.74
-29% 2
PURI
621.53
470.78
-24% 3
JAGATSINGHPUR
447.11
340.36 4
KHURDHA
664.55
506.87 5
JAJPUR
788.17
601.19 6
SAMBALPUR
363.18
277.67 7
KENDRAPARA
637.84
489.52
-23% 8
ANGUL
501.14
384.66 9
SONEPUR
263.05
201.93 10
JHARSUGUDA
230.42
176.91

21. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
MME Utilisation ( to )
Utilisation(Rs. In lakhs) 1%
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

22. Transport Assistance Utilisation (1.4.08 to 31.12.08)
Utilisation(Rs. In lakhs)
(100%)
(85%)
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

23. Achievement during 2008-09 (Kitchen Sheds)
Progress (in %)
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

24. Achievement during 2008-09 (Kitchen Devices)
Progress (in %)
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

25. Performance Score card – A Summary
Sl. No.
Component
Achievement
Benchmark 1.
Foodgrains Availability
93%
85% 2.
Foodgrains Utilisation
75%
72% 3.
Cooking Cost Utilisation
58% 4.
MME Utilisation 1%
100% 5.
Kitchen Shed construction 6.
Kitchen Devices procurement
68% 7
QPRs received
2 nos. (Only Pry)
3 nos.
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

26. Analysis of State’s Proposal for 2009-10
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

27. Time Series – No. of Children (PRIMARY)
(down by 10%)
(down by 10%)
No. of children (in lakhs)
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

28. Primary School Enrolment – SSA Vs MDM [Govt. + Govt.-aided + LB]
(7% More)
No. of children (in lakhs)
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

29. Population Vs Enrolment Vs Availing MDM (PRIMARY)
No. of children (in lakhs)
Q-1
Q-2
(Proposed)
No EGS/AIE Centre for
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

30. Population Vs Enrolment Vs Availing MDM during 2008-09 (UPPER PRIMARY)
No. of children (in lakhs)
(Proposed)
*:SSA= Govt+LB+GA
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

31. No. of School Working Days (Pry & U Pry) DISE Vs MDM
Sl. No
Year
As per DISE Data
As per MDM Sanctions 1
216
230 3
211
220 4
210 5
Not available
(State’s claim for )
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India

32. Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India
Thank You
Ministry of HRD, Govt. of India